Protesters call for end of federal law enforcement takeover of DCNew Foto - Protesters call for end of federal law enforcement takeover of DC

Scores of protesters marched in Washington, DC, on Saturday against President Donald Trump's federal takeover of the city's police department anddeployment of National Guardtroops to the capital. Holding signs that read "protect DC home rule" and "stop the Trump takeover," participants in the "We Are All DC" march journeyed from Meridian Hill Park to Freedom Plaza near the White House to protest what they see as Trump's authoritarian push to control the district. "To see the destruction of the federal workforce and the importation of the National Guard to try to keep peace where crime is at the lowest it's been in 30 years. It's just, it moved me to protest," David Reinke, a former government contractor who lives in neighboring Maryland, told CNN. Last month, Trump declared a crime emergency and ordered the federal government to take control of DC's police department, surged federal law enforcement into the district and deployed National Guard troops – a broad effort that has drawn the ire of many city residents. DC's violent crime rate has plummeted in the last decades and reached its lowest since 1966 in 2024,CNN previously reported. Of the National Guard troops in DC, Howard University student Stephanie Collins-Stewart told CNN, "I honestly feel like it's a tactic, like they're trying to intimidate us. But I've been going here for school for the past few years and I know what DC is like. It's pretty calm for the most part." Another protester, Kristine Sieloff, a public school teacher from Baltimore, told CNN she's concerned Trump will soon send the National Guard to her city — which he has threatened — arguing that it's just "a show of force that's meant to intimidate people." Marchers on Saturday also held anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement signs, and some participants CNN spoke to expressed disapproval of the Trump administration's ICE raids, arguing that it's pulling families apart. "There's got to be a more humane and more diplomatic way to deal with people who are undocumented, and the way they're doing it is very inhumane," Tammi Price, a retired teacher, told CNN. "There's so much more that could be done with the millions and millions of dollars that taxpayers are paying for occupation, the occupation of ICE and the National Guard," she argued. "Those are our tax dollars." The mission iscosting roughly $1 milliona day, experts estimated to CNN. CNN's Jenna Monnin contributed to this report. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Protesters call for end of federal law enforcement takeover of DC

Protesters call for end of federal law enforcement takeover of DC Scores of protesters marched in Washington, DC, on Saturday against Presid...
Trump administration launches immigration crackdown in Massachusetts, reports sayNew Foto - Trump administration launches immigration crackdown in Massachusetts, reports say

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Trump administration has launched an operation in Massachusetts to arrest and deport undocumented immigrants, the New York Times and Boston media reported on Saturday, quoting the Department of Homeland Security as saying it was targeting "criminal aliens" living in the state. DHS and its U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement arm are calling the operation Patriot 2.0, modifying the name of a May deportation surge that led to the arrest of 1,500 people in the state, according to the reports. A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The operation is expected to last several weeks, the New York Times said, quoting unnamed sources with knowledge of the matter. One of the sources told the Times that Patriot 2.0 was focused on targeting immigrants who had been released from custody despite ICE agents attempting to pick them up from local jails. It was not immediately clear how many federal officers were involved in the crackdown, which comes as Chicago braces for a Trump administration ramp-up of deportations in the third-largest U.S. city. NBC 10 Boston quoted a statement from a DHS spokesperson as deriding Boston Mayor Michelle Wu's so-called sanctuary policies. "Sanctuary policies like those pushed by Mayor Wu not only attract and harbor criminals but also place these public safety threats above the interests of law-abiding American citizens. ICE is arresting sex offenders, pedophiles, murderers, drug dealers, and gang members released by local authorities," the statement reported by NBC 10 said. (Reporting by David Lawder, Editing by Nick Zieminski)

Trump administration launches immigration crackdown in Massachusetts, reports say

Trump administration launches immigration crackdown in Massachusetts, reports say WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Trump administration has launche...
Trump's former surgeon general calls for RFK Jr. to be firedNew Foto - Trump's former surgeon general calls for RFK Jr. to be fired

Jerome Adams, who served as US surgeon general during President Donald Trump's first administration, is calling for Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to be fired as controversy continues to swirl over his handling of vaccine approvals. When asked by CNN's Victor Blackwell on Saturday if Trump should fire Kennedy, Adams said, "I absolutely believe that he should for the sake of the nation and the sake of his legacy." Adams' comments come after acontentious hearingon Capitol Hill earlier this week, where Kennedy was grilled by both Democrats and Republicans about his views on vaccines and the recentexodus at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, including the resignation of its director, over tighter vaccine policies Kennedy was pushing. "I'm deeply concerned about the health and safety of our nation under RFK's current leadership," Adams told Blackwell, later adding: "I absolutely believe he is uniquely damaging the credibility of federal agencies like the CDC, (National Institutes of Health, Food and Drug Administration) and he's putting us at risk." The former surgeon general also raised concerns about Trump's close relationship with Kennedy, arguing that the president should take charge of health policy. "I'm just flabbergasted, to be honest, that he seems to have President Trump in a thrall," Adams said. "President Trump is clearly the leader on foreign policy, clearly the leader on the economy and tariffs. But when it comes to health he's doing whatever RFK says." Yet, Adams said he is "hopeful" that Trump will recognize what he described as "the danger" Kennedy poses. "I still am hopeful that President Trump will begin to see the danger that is being presented — not just to America, but to his own legacy — by continuing to have RFK in this position, making these horrific decisions," Adams told Blackwell. During Thursday's congressional hearing, Kennedy defended the changes at the CDC, claiming that they "were absolutely necessary adjustments to restore the agency to its role as the world's gold standard public health agency." When Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren argued that last month's decision by the FDA — which falls under Kennedy's purview — is effectively denying some people access toupdated Covid-19 vaccinesafter only approving it for a limited group of people, Kennedy cast doubt on the efficacy of the vaccine. "I'm not going to recommend a product for which there's no clinical data for that indication. Is that what I should be doing?"Kennedy asked Warren. Following the hearing,Trump praised Kennedy's performance, saying that while he didn't watch the hearing, "I heard he did very well today." But on Friday Trump appeared to distance himself from Florida's decision to eliminate school vaccine requirements, that all people should get certain vaccines. "I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated," he said. "You have vaccines that work, they just pure and simple work. They're not controversial at all, and I think those vaccines should be used, otherwise some people are going to catch it, and they endanger other people." CNN's Adam Cancryn contributed to this report. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Trump’s former surgeon general calls for RFK Jr. to be fired

Trump's former surgeon general calls for RFK Jr. to be fired Jerome Adams, who served as US surgeon general during President Donald Trum...
Bipartisan group of lawmakers aim to increase migrant physician jobsNew Foto - Bipartisan group of lawmakers aim to increase migrant physician jobs

(The Center Square) - A bipartisan group of Congressional lawmakers wants to expand a program that allows noncitizens to fill physician vacancies in rural areas of the United States that are experiencing shortages. TheConrad 30 programprovides waivers to foreign medical graduates with educational visas so they can stay in the United States and serve as medical professionals in underserved areas. Typically, foreign medical graduates must return to their home countries to practice medicine after studying in the United States. The program is administered through different agencies in each state and admits 30 graduates in each state per year. The states place the foreign medical graduates in medically underserved areas for a minimum three year contract. The bipartisan bill aims to expand the amount of graduates each state can admit per year based on how many waivers get approved in that state in the year before. U.S. Reps. David Valadao, R-Calif., Brad Schneider, D-Colo., Don Bacon, R-Ill., and Mike Garcia, D-Calif., cosponsored the bipartisan legislation. "Programs like Conrad 30 have been instrumental in helping address this gap by bringing highly trained physicians to the areas that need them most," Valadao said The bill would allot 35 waivers to states that use 90% of their waivers from the previous year. The bill also would allow states to get more waivers each year as demand increases. "Expanding the Conrad 30 visa waiver program is a smart, commonsense step that both parties can support to ensure all Americans have access to quality health care, from doctors they trust, where and when they need it," Schneider said. The bill could be seen as a necessary move in states where the Conrad 30 program is widely used and very popular. In fiscal year 2024, 19 states reported filling all slots in the Conrad 30 program, according todatacollected by 3RNET, a nonprofit that connects health professionals with jobs in rural areas. Those states are Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Connecticut, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania and South Carolina. If the bill passes, these states would be eligible for an increase in granted waivers. In fiscal year 2024, the Conrad 30 program filled 1,010 positions for physicians across the country, according to 3RNET. The bill also could be popular among voters. A recent poll commissioned by The Center Square found71% of American voterssaid it is "very important" to increase legal pathways for immigrants who are doctors and nurses to live and work in the United States. The American Medical Association and Association of American Medical Colleges also praised the introduction of the bill. The AAMC sent aletter of supportfor the bill in March. "With the physician workforce crisis showing no signs of abating, the Conrad 30 program remains an important tool to help ensure patients, particularly in rural and underserved communities, continue to have access to physicians," said Bruce Scott, president of the American Medical Association.

Bipartisan group of lawmakers aim to increase migrant physician jobs

Bipartisan group of lawmakers aim to increase migrant physician jobs (The Center Square) - A bipartisan group of Congressional lawmakers wan...
Major Gun-Rights Groups Oppose the Trump Administration's Idea to Ban Trans People from Owning GunsNew Foto - Major Gun-Rights Groups Oppose the Trump Administration's Idea to Ban Trans People from Owning Guns

The Trump administration's reported proposal to ban trans people from owning guns has drawn condemnation from the National Rifle Association (NRA) and every other notable gun-rights group in the country. TheDaily Wirefirst reportedThursday, based on anonymous Justice Department sources, that senior officials in the department are considering using their rulemaking authority to declare that trans people are mentally ill, stripping them of their Second Amendment rights. Other major news outletsre-reported the story. The Justice Department hasn't issued any such rule yet, or attached a name to any of the statements leaking out to the press, so this all amounts to more of a trial balloon. But asReason's Jacob Sullumwrote, the idea is "legally loony." There is no statutory authority for such a categorical decree. Even if Congress did pass such a law, it would be unconstitutional based on current Supreme Court precedent and prevailing circuit court opinions. If the Trump administration was hoping to get a pass from gun-rights groups over these small details, it will be disappointed. Categorical bans—issued by executive fiat no less—have been a red line for pro-Second Amendment groups and lawmakers for decades. "The NRA supports the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans to purchase, possess and use firearms," the organizationpostedFriday on X. "The NRA does not, and will not, support any policy proposals that implement sweeping gun bans that arbitrarily strip law-abiding citizens of their Second Amendment rights without due process." The Second Amendment isn't up for debate.pic.twitter.com/AQwouV4VDd — NRA (@NRA)September 5, 2025 Stephen Gutowski, an independent journalist covering gun rights and the gun industry, reported that the NRA wasn't alone: "Every major gun-rights group has now spoken against the idea of the DOJ trying to strip trans people of their gun rights en masse," hewroteon X Friday. Gutowski's tally included Gun Owners of America, the Second Amendment Foundation, the Firearms Policy Coalition, the National Association for Gun Rights, and the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. "Disarming trans individuals based purely on their self-identification flies in the face of the Constitution and the current administration's purported support for the Second Amendment," the Second Amendment Foundationsaidin a statement toNewsweek. "Beyond the bad policy and constitutional infirmities of such 'considerations' the Department of Justice has no authority to unilaterally identify groups of people that it would like to strip of their constitutional rights. SAF sincerely hopes that the reports of such considerations by the DOJ are inaccurate, as the policy reportedly being contemplated is worthy of the strongest possible condemnation and legal action." Second Amendment groups often remind gun-control advocates that, historically, things don't tend to go well for minority groups after they're disarmed by the government, so it's good to see them presenting a united front against just such a proposal. If the Trump Administration has any ability to read the room, it will quietly forget about its idea to illegally strip a group of Americans of their constitutional right to bear arms. The postMajor Gun-Rights Groups Oppose the Trump Administration's Idea to Ban Trans People from Owning Gunsappeared first onReason.com.

Major Gun-Rights Groups Oppose the Trump Administration's Idea to Ban Trans People from Owning Guns

Major Gun-Rights Groups Oppose the Trump Administration's Idea to Ban Trans People from Owning Guns The Trump administration's repor...

 

VS POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com