Smithsonian says Trump impeachment exhibits will be restoredNew Foto - Smithsonian says Trump impeachment exhibits will be restored

Washington —The Smithsonian said Saturday that it would update an exhibit at the National Museum of American History to reflect all impeachment proceedings in U.S. history after a placard was removed last month. "As the keeper of memory for the nation, it is our privilege and responsibility to tell accurate and complete histories," the Smithsonian said in a statement. The statement came after The Washington Postreportedlast week that the museum had removed references to President Trump's two impeachments earlier in the month as part of a content review. In the statement, the Smithsonian acknowledged the recent reporting around the matter, saying a placard was removed in July from the exhibit, "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden," which the museum said is intended to "reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history." The Smithsonian said it was "not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit." "The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a twenty-five year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline and overall presentation," the statement said. "It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard." Mr. Trump was impeached by the House in2019on charges related to efforts to pressure Ukraine to investigate his political rival, and in2021for inciting the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. He was acquitted in the Senate in both cases. Presidents Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton were also impeached, and both were also acquitted in the Senate. President Richard Nixon resigned facing an impeachment inquiry. The Smithsonian outlined that the impeachment section of the exhibit will be updated in the "coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history." Black swimmers teach others amid history of aquatic segregation Nature: Chimpanzees in Louisiana Full Interview: U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on "Face the Nation"

Smithsonian says Trump impeachment exhibits will be restored

Smithsonian says Trump impeachment exhibits will be restored Washington —The Smithsonian said Saturday that it would update an exhibit at th...
Democrats work to transcend weak party brand by exploiting Trump's problemsNew Foto - Democrats work to transcend weak party brand by exploiting Trump's problems

WASHINGTON — As members of Congress prepare to head home for summer recess, both parties are reckoning with their respective weaknesses and monitoring key changes to the emerging 2026 landscape. Democrats, saddled with record-low ratings for their party, are seeking a jolt of energy from appealing local candidates who can credibly claim distance from the national brand and the disappointments of 2024. Republicans are looking to sell voters on the most popular aspects of President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," though Trump's own ratings have slid this year and polls show the sweeping law to be unpopular overall. It all comes as both parties are gearing up for next year's midterm elections, which historically tend to be a referendum on the president. Republicans control both chambers of Congress, with Democrats needing to net three seats to take control of the House and four to flip the Senate. The president's party traditionally loses seats in a midterm year, thoughnew Republican redistricting effortscould bolster Trump's GOP. Democrats face a steeper climb in the Senate, with most of the Republican seats up in 2026 in red states. Still, Democrats are more optimistic lately that voters' disdain for their party will subside — and that a combination of unpopular Trump policies, strong Democratic candidates, high base enthusiasm and a fragile Republican coalition could tilt the midterm battlefield in their favor. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., who chairs the party's Senate campaign arm, said she sees Democratic prospects improving and predicted a "backlash" reminiscent of the 2006 midterms, when she was first elected to Congress and Democrats pulled off surprise wins in red states. "I think the Republican majority is at risk because of a series of recruitment failures, damaging primaries and their very toxic plan that slashes Medicaid and spikes costs," she said. Republicans stress that they remain in a strong position. "We feel very confident. Certainly not complacent, but confident," said Alex Latcham, executive director of the Senate Leadership Fund, the GOP super PAC aligned with Senate Majority Leader John Thune. "We're taking nothing for granted." While they feel optimistic about their midterm prospects, Democrats acknowledge that they have a brand problem. Polls taken throughout 2025have shown record-low ratings for the Democratic Party, with the GOP faring better, though also in net-negative territory. AQuinnipiac pollthis month found that voters gave Democrats in Congress a dismal 19% approval rating, with 72% disapproving. Even self-identified Democrats disapproved by a 13-point margin. Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., who chairs Democrats' House campaign committee, acknowledged her party's brand problem in a recent conversation with reporters. She said House Democrats have to work to transcend it with "great candidates" who offer "authentic" messages for their districts. Voters "are absolutely frustrated with the dysfunction, the chaos that they see in Washington, D.C. And they want strong representatives who are going to stand up for them," DelBene said. DelBene suggested more than a dozen House Democrats were able to win last year even as Trump carried their districts "because we had people who were talking directly to voters, who were talking about the issues that matter." Some Democrats also note that the low ratings are driven in part by Democratic voters who are unhappy with their own party but who won't be inclined to support Republicans. Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said the polls show "there are a lot of Democrats out there who want us to be fighting harder," arguing that his party can turn the problem into an advantage. "Trump is lighting our democracy on fire, and so it's frankly a good sign that there's a lot of Americans who see the threat that he poses to people's health care, to our way of life, to our very democracy, and want their leaders here to be standing up and fighting," Murphy told NBC News. "I understand that those numbers look kind of harrowing for Democrats, but at some level, it's a good sign." Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who is retiring, also warned that the Democrats' low rating won't save the GOP next fall. He noted that the Republican Party's broad brand was in terrible shape the year before the 2010 GOP wave election. NBC News' July 2009 poll showed 28% of respondents viewing the Republican Party positively, versus 41% who viewed it negatively. "I would go back and remind everybody to look at roughly the 2009 time frame when the same sort of assessments were being made in reverse," Tillis said. "We should take nothing for granted. We should all assume we're running from behind." Both the House and Senate majorities run through territory Trump won in 2024. House Republicans are defending just three districts Trump lost last year, while 13 Democrats are defending seats Trump carried, according to an analysis of election results from the NBC News Decision Desk. Senate Democrats, meanwhile, need to net four seats to take control of the chamber, and just one Republican, Maine's Susan Collins, represents a state that also backed former Vice President Kamala Harris last year. Any path to the majority requires Democrats to win a few states Trump carried by double digits. Pressed on which seats she sees as competitive enough for Democrats to flip, Gillibrand declined to name states but said "there's at least seven or eight states that are going to be in play because of the nature of their agenda." Joanna Rodriguez, a spokeswoman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee, laughed when asked about Gillibrand's contention that seven pickups are a possibility. "Democrats are facing historically low approval ratings of 19% because their delusional leaders focus on radical policies that are unpopular with voters," she said, adding that Republicans are working to "lower costs of living, eliminate government fraud and waste, and keep males out of girls' sports." Democrats are trying to cut into the red-tinted map with specific candidates who have demonstrated crossover appeal before. Former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper, who just jumped into the race to succeed Tillis, has won six statewide elections since 2000. He's on a collision course with Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley, who launched his own campaign Thursday after Trump asked him to run. Tillis warned Tuesday that Cooper will "no doubt" be a formidable candidate. In Ohio, a state unlikely to have a heavily contested Senate race without a particularly strong Democratic candidate, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has twice traveled to the state in recent months as part of an aggressive recruitment effort targeting former Sen. Sherrod Brown, who lost his seat to Republican Bernie Moreno last year despite outrunning the top of the ticket. Schumer's latest visit came last week, a source familiar with the meeting confirmed to NBC News. (The meeting wasfirst reported by Axios.) Brown has been contemplating a comeback but is torn between the idea of running for Senate or running for governor in 2026, which would give his party a top-tier candidate to take on Trump-endorsed Vivek Ramaswamy. In Texas, meanwhile, some Republicans are worried about scandal-tarred Attorney General Ken Paxton defeating Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, in the primary and jeopardizing a safe seat in the general election. "Number one, he's not going to win. But number two, if he were to win, I think it would jeopardize the president's agenda," Cornyn told NBC News. "It would be the first loss of a statewide race by Republicans in 30 years. So it'd be a disaster." "All that money could be used to pick up Senate seats in Georgia, New Hampshire and Michigan," he added. "But we don't need — we don't expect to give Democrats that opportunity." Democrats have also been buoyed by recent polls with warning signs for Trump and Republicans defending their slim majorities in Congress. The president's approval rating has declined by a net 8 points since April, per a recentFox News poll. Voters remain unhappy with the cost of living, and the president's ratings on handling prices and the economy have tanked — though voters also split evenly on the question of which party they trusted more to handle those issues. Trump's "big, beautiful" law, which both parties call the defining issue in the midterms, is also broadly unpopular, although some provisions get high marks. And the GOP faces a unique challenge: turning out Trump supporters who don't show up as regularly when he isn't on the ballot. Democrats have also stumbled on an issue that provides a rare opening to drive a wedge between Trump and his base: encouraging MAGA-world criticism of how the administration has handled government files surrounding convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. As they prepared for the monthlong August recess, House Democratic leaders distributed a memo encouraging their members to highlight the issue back in their states and districts. Republicans, meanwhile, urged their members to campaign on the "big beautiful bill." The National Republican Congressional Committee issued a memo on Monday urging GOP lawmakers to hold local events and engage with local media to tout popular provisions in the bill, like making the 2017 tax cuts permanent, increasing the child tax credit, cutting taxes on tips and overtime pay, and boosting funds for border security. "Out of touch House Democrats voted to raise taxes, kill jobs, gut national security, and allow wide open borders — it's no surprise their polling is in the gutter," NRCC spokesman Mike Marinella said in a statement. "We will use every tool to show voters that the provisions in this bill are widely popular and that Republicans stood with them while House Democrats sold them out." Republicans have started to tout the measure on the airwaves. One Nation, the nonprofit arm of the main Senate GOP super PAC, haslaunched adspraising it as a "working family tax cut." The GOP also plans to nationalize New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist whose focus on affordability and grassroots energy powered his campaign. "While President Trump and Republicans are delivering real results by lowering costs and securing the border, Democrats are embracing radical candidates like socialist Zohran Mamdani and fomenting violence against ICE and Border Patrol agents," Republican National Committee spokeswoman Kiersten Pels said. Still, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., warned that Democrats' weak brand won't save the GOP in the 2026 election. "It'll be a referendum on the party in power, which would be us," Hawley said, adding that his party can only win "by delivering for the people who elected you, which would be my humble suggestion to my Republican friends."

Democrats work to transcend weak party brand by exploiting Trump's problems

Democrats work to transcend weak party brand by exploiting Trump's problems WASHINGTON — As members of Congress prepare to head home for...
Eric Holder backs Democratic response to Texas redistricting planNew Foto - Eric Holder backs Democratic response to Texas redistricting plan

Eric Holder, chair of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, called Texas' attempt to redraw its congressional maps for the second time in less than a decade "an authoritarian move" by the White House. Holder, attorney general under President Barack Obama, has led the charge among Democrats to eliminate gerrymandering for years. But speaking with "This Week With George Stephanopoulos" on Sunday, Holder said that Texas' plan means Democrats need to "do things that perhaps in the past I would not have supported." "I think that responsible Democrats in other states have to take into account the threat to our democracy, the need to preserve our democracy, so that we can ultimately try to heal it," Holder said. "And I would hope that they will take steps that are, again, as I said, temporary but responsible." "And we're seeing talk about that in California, we're seeing talk about that in New York, as well. "But those attempts are more longshots, aren't they?" Stephanopoulos asked, referring to laws on the books in those states that protect against partisan gerrymandering. Trump's political operation floated the prospect of redistricting in June in efforts to shore up the GOP's fragile House majority. Trump said his party could pick up five seats if Texas redraws its congressional map. He suggested that there "could be" other states that follow suit but didn't identify them. The Department of Justice told Texas in a letter in July that four majority-minority districts represented by Democrats needed to be redrawn, arguing they were "unconstitutional racial gerrymanders." While Holder conceded that the actions Democrats could take would ultimately depend on each state, he argued that those protections are an advantage. "What they're trying to do in Texas is simply impose a new map on, an unpopular new map, on the people of Texas. To do it in California, you actually have to go to the people and ask them to suspend that which they have in place, which is a really well-functioning, independent redistricting committee," Holder said. "So the people will have a voice in what California does. The people do not have a voice, a meaningful voice, it appears so far in Texas." This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

Eric Holder backs Democratic response to Texas redistricting plan

Eric Holder backs Democratic response to Texas redistricting plan Eric Holder, chair of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, cal...
Texas panel advances redrawn congressional map that could take 5 Democratic seatsNew Foto - Texas panel advances redrawn congressional map that could take 5 Democratic seats

A Texas House panel on Saturday advanced anew congressional mapas state Republicanspower ahead with a strategybacked by President Donald Trump to help the GOP maintain the US House majority in the 2026 midterms. The map, unveiled earlier this week, attempts to make five Democratic congressional seats more favorable to Republicans. Texas Republicans argue the move is necessary over concerns that the current maps are unconstitutional and racially gerrymandered. Democrats havesaid it would suppressthe votes of people of color. The Texas House redistricting committee voted along party lines Saturday to approve the map, setting up a full House vote. Texas Democratic Party Chair Kendall Scudder said Saturday the party will file a lawsuit if the map passes, adding that state Republicans are "silencing voters on behalf of Donald Trump." "Democrats must fight this Trump power grab through any means necessary, and blue states across the country should use this as a signal flare to start carving up their own states and make these authoritarian wannabe Republican lawmakers regret ever opening up this redistricting discussion in the first place," Scudder said in a statement. Democratic governors in states like California have already warned they will attempt the same tactics to help their party win more seats, in what one US House Democrat described to CNN as a "redistricting arms race." US House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and his political team areexploring similar plansin California, New York, New Jersey, Minnesota and Washington state in hopes of flipping at least a handful of Republican seats next November. Democrats need a net gain of just three seats to win the House in the midterms. The new Texas map features 30 districts that Trump would have won in 2024 if the map was in place, up from 27 under the current district lines. In total, there arefive more seats that Trump wonby more than 10 percentage points, according to data from the Texas Legislative Council. The proposed map eliminates the Austin-area seat of Rep. Greg Casar, who would likely be forced into a primary with another liberal Democrat, Rep. Lloyd Doggett, in the Austin area. Multiple people close to Doggett have told CNN they do not expect him to bow out quietly and instead foresee the two battling it out in a primary. One of those people close to the senior House Democrat pointed out that he has $6.2 million cash on hand. In a statement this week, Doggett did not address the question of his future and said his "sole focus" is defeating the new GOP map. Casar, for his part, vowed in a statement to "fight back with everything we've got," calling for voters to "mobilize against this illegal map." Republicans also propose merging the Houston-area seat of Rep. Al Green with a vacant seat held by thelate Rep. Sylvester Turner, who died in office earlier this year. Green's district was altered more than any other sitting member in the plan. Democrats expect Green to run in the new seat, though he may have to battle it out with some of the Democrats who were already running for the Turner seat. The map would also make two southern Texas seats — held by Democratic Reps. Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez — more Republican-leaning. But multiple Democrats view the seats as still in reach for the two centrist members who typically performed ahead of statewide or national Democrats. Trump has not yet weighed in on the proposed Texas map. CNN's Sarah Ferris and Ethan Cohen contributed to this report. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Texas panel advances redrawn congressional map that could take 5 Democratic seats

Texas panel advances redrawn congressional map that could take 5 Democratic seats A Texas House panel on Saturday advanced anew congressiona...
Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's StrategiesNew Foto - Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's Strategies

U.S. President Donald Trump shake hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, on July 16, 2018. Credit - Brendan Smialowski—Getty Images President DonaldTrump's firing of the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)on Friday afternoon just after she delivered a negative jobs report echoes the impulse of many leaders to shoot the messenger.Trump declared, "I've had issues with the numbers for a long time. We're doing so well. I believe the numbers were phony like they were before the election and there were other times. So I fired her, and I did the right thing." WhileTrump may or may not be friends with Vladimir Putin, he is clearly following the Russian President's HR staffing guidelines to eliminate lieutenants who bring bad news. Aswe've documented before, the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) has a longhistory of manipulating official economic statisticsto please Putin, "bending over backward to correct bad numbers and burying unflattering statistics" under the pressure the Kremlin has exerted to corrupt statistical integrity, especially since Putin's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The reliability of official statistics from China has also beenbrought into question, leading analysts to rely on a wide range of unofficial or proxy indicators to gauge the true state of the Chinese economy. Even China's former Premier, the late Li Keqiang,reportedly confidedthat he didn't trust official GDP numbers. Read More:What to Know About the Jobs Report That Led Trump to Fire the Labor Statistics Chief Like other strongmen, Trump has repeatedly shown a pattern of manipulating data to suit his preferred narrative. Trump's surprise firing of BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer has quickly caught the attention of technical market analysts and economists on both sides of the political spectrum. One side cheers the push to disrupt a slow, bureaucratic federal agency. The other side shouts in dismay over concerns about yet another example of Trump politicizing an apolitical institution. Both responses are warranted. The accuracy of BLS data has long been questioned as major revisions only come in months later. To their credit, the BLS, in addition to other statistical agencies, has publiclyrecognizeda need to modernize its methodology. Unfortunately, though, the severity of job revisions has worsened since the COVID-19 era, with no successful program to address the issue. The downward revision on Friday of more than 250,000 jobs marked the most significant adjustment since the depths of the pandemic. However, Trump'saccusationsagainst the BLS of rigging the job numbers to make him and the Republican base look bad, and his subsequent firing of McEntarfer based on a belief that BLS revisions were politically motivated, are yet another step closer to authoritarianism. Introducing his latest conspiracy theory, the President went even further by suggesting McEntarfer, whose career spans two decades across Republican and Democratic Administrations, rigged the numbers "around the 2024 presidential election" in then-Vice PresidentKamala Harris' favor. Trump conveniently fails to mention that his definition of "around" was backin August 2024. Recall, the 2024 presidential election was a full three months later in November. Revisions are not unusual behavior by the BLS. They are a critical part of the natural process for developing an accurate picture of the largest, most dynamic economy in the world. Theaverage size of job revisionssince 2003 is not insignificant at 51,000 jobs. And, despite what Trump may want Americans to believe, his tariff policies have created an unprecedented level of uncertainty in the U.S. economy, comparable only to that of 2020, with many economists expecting a recession to follow as a result.Bloomberg reportinghas pointed to a possible connection between the severity of negative job revisions and recessionary economic environments. The BLS has also been subjected to DOGE-ledhiring constraints and other resource rescissions. In addition, the Trump Administration's disbanding of the Federal Statistics Advisory Committee in March both eliminated one of the main engines for enhancing agency performance and, perhaps, in what should have been a concerning harbinger, abolished the canary in the data integrity coal mine. Complaints about BLS methods are legitimate, like the reliance on enumerators over scanner data, and deserve attention, but this is not how to fix it. Read More:What Trump's Win Means for the Economy This is far from the first time Trump has subordinated statistical integrity to political theater. Fromcrowd sizesto weather forecasts,vote countstotariff formulas, Trump has discarded facts for fictions that play to his political favor. Trump doesn't just bend the truth—he twists the numbers until they resemble propaganda and then silences those who disagree. As CBS News titan Edward R. Murrow warned 65 years ago: "To be persuasive, we must be believable. To be believable, we must be credible. To be credible, we must be truthful." Contact usatletters@time.com.

Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's Strategies

Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's Strategies U.S. President Donald Trump shake hands with Russian President Vladimir...

 

VS POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com