Texas panel advances redrawn congressional map that could take 5 Democratic seatsNew Foto - Texas panel advances redrawn congressional map that could take 5 Democratic seats

A Texas House panel on Saturday advanced anew congressional mapas state Republicanspower ahead with a strategybacked by President Donald Trump to help the GOP maintain the US House majority in the 2026 midterms. The map, unveiled earlier this week, attempts to make five Democratic congressional seats more favorable to Republicans. Texas Republicans argue the move is necessary over concerns that the current maps are unconstitutional and racially gerrymandered. Democrats havesaid it would suppressthe votes of people of color. The Texas House redistricting committee voted along party lines Saturday to approve the map, setting up a full House vote. Texas Democratic Party Chair Kendall Scudder said Saturday the party will file a lawsuit if the map passes, adding that state Republicans are "silencing voters on behalf of Donald Trump." "Democrats must fight this Trump power grab through any means necessary, and blue states across the country should use this as a signal flare to start carving up their own states and make these authoritarian wannabe Republican lawmakers regret ever opening up this redistricting discussion in the first place," Scudder said in a statement. Democratic governors in states like California have already warned they will attempt the same tactics to help their party win more seats, in what one US House Democrat described to CNN as a "redistricting arms race." US House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and his political team areexploring similar plansin California, New York, New Jersey, Minnesota and Washington state in hopes of flipping at least a handful of Republican seats next November. Democrats need a net gain of just three seats to win the House in the midterms. The new Texas map features 30 districts that Trump would have won in 2024 if the map was in place, up from 27 under the current district lines. In total, there arefive more seats that Trump wonby more than 10 percentage points, according to data from the Texas Legislative Council. The proposed map eliminates the Austin-area seat of Rep. Greg Casar, who would likely be forced into a primary with another liberal Democrat, Rep. Lloyd Doggett, in the Austin area. Multiple people close to Doggett have told CNN they do not expect him to bow out quietly and instead foresee the two battling it out in a primary. One of those people close to the senior House Democrat pointed out that he has $6.2 million cash on hand. In a statement this week, Doggett did not address the question of his future and said his "sole focus" is defeating the new GOP map. Casar, for his part, vowed in a statement to "fight back with everything we've got," calling for voters to "mobilize against this illegal map." Republicans also propose merging the Houston-area seat of Rep. Al Green with a vacant seat held by thelate Rep. Sylvester Turner, who died in office earlier this year. Green's district was altered more than any other sitting member in the plan. Democrats expect Green to run in the new seat, though he may have to battle it out with some of the Democrats who were already running for the Turner seat. The map would also make two southern Texas seats — held by Democratic Reps. Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez — more Republican-leaning. But multiple Democrats view the seats as still in reach for the two centrist members who typically performed ahead of statewide or national Democrats. Trump has not yet weighed in on the proposed Texas map. CNN's Sarah Ferris and Ethan Cohen contributed to this report. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Texas panel advances redrawn congressional map that could take 5 Democratic seats

Texas panel advances redrawn congressional map that could take 5 Democratic seats A Texas House panel on Saturday advanced anew congressiona...
Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's StrategiesNew Foto - Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's Strategies

U.S. President Donald Trump shake hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, on July 16, 2018. Credit - Brendan Smialowski—Getty Images President DonaldTrump's firing of the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)on Friday afternoon just after she delivered a negative jobs report echoes the impulse of many leaders to shoot the messenger.Trump declared, "I've had issues with the numbers for a long time. We're doing so well. I believe the numbers were phony like they were before the election and there were other times. So I fired her, and I did the right thing." WhileTrump may or may not be friends with Vladimir Putin, he is clearly following the Russian President's HR staffing guidelines to eliminate lieutenants who bring bad news. Aswe've documented before, the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) has a longhistory of manipulating official economic statisticsto please Putin, "bending over backward to correct bad numbers and burying unflattering statistics" under the pressure the Kremlin has exerted to corrupt statistical integrity, especially since Putin's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The reliability of official statistics from China has also beenbrought into question, leading analysts to rely on a wide range of unofficial or proxy indicators to gauge the true state of the Chinese economy. Even China's former Premier, the late Li Keqiang,reportedly confidedthat he didn't trust official GDP numbers. Read More:What to Know About the Jobs Report That Led Trump to Fire the Labor Statistics Chief Like other strongmen, Trump has repeatedly shown a pattern of manipulating data to suit his preferred narrative. Trump's surprise firing of BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer has quickly caught the attention of technical market analysts and economists on both sides of the political spectrum. One side cheers the push to disrupt a slow, bureaucratic federal agency. The other side shouts in dismay over concerns about yet another example of Trump politicizing an apolitical institution. Both responses are warranted. The accuracy of BLS data has long been questioned as major revisions only come in months later. To their credit, the BLS, in addition to other statistical agencies, has publiclyrecognizeda need to modernize its methodology. Unfortunately, though, the severity of job revisions has worsened since the COVID-19 era, with no successful program to address the issue. The downward revision on Friday of more than 250,000 jobs marked the most significant adjustment since the depths of the pandemic. However, Trump'saccusationsagainst the BLS of rigging the job numbers to make him and the Republican base look bad, and his subsequent firing of McEntarfer based on a belief that BLS revisions were politically motivated, are yet another step closer to authoritarianism. Introducing his latest conspiracy theory, the President went even further by suggesting McEntarfer, whose career spans two decades across Republican and Democratic Administrations, rigged the numbers "around the 2024 presidential election" in then-Vice PresidentKamala Harris' favor. Trump conveniently fails to mention that his definition of "around" was backin August 2024. Recall, the 2024 presidential election was a full three months later in November. Revisions are not unusual behavior by the BLS. They are a critical part of the natural process for developing an accurate picture of the largest, most dynamic economy in the world. Theaverage size of job revisionssince 2003 is not insignificant at 51,000 jobs. And, despite what Trump may want Americans to believe, his tariff policies have created an unprecedented level of uncertainty in the U.S. economy, comparable only to that of 2020, with many economists expecting a recession to follow as a result.Bloomberg reportinghas pointed to a possible connection between the severity of negative job revisions and recessionary economic environments. The BLS has also been subjected to DOGE-ledhiring constraints and other resource rescissions. In addition, the Trump Administration's disbanding of the Federal Statistics Advisory Committee in March both eliminated one of the main engines for enhancing agency performance and, perhaps, in what should have been a concerning harbinger, abolished the canary in the data integrity coal mine. Complaints about BLS methods are legitimate, like the reliance on enumerators over scanner data, and deserve attention, but this is not how to fix it. Read More:What Trump's Win Means for the Economy This is far from the first time Trump has subordinated statistical integrity to political theater. Fromcrowd sizesto weather forecasts,vote countstotariff formulas, Trump has discarded facts for fictions that play to his political favor. Trump doesn't just bend the truth—he twists the numbers until they resemble propaganda and then silences those who disagree. As CBS News titan Edward R. Murrow warned 65 years ago: "To be persuasive, we must be believable. To be believable, we must be credible. To be credible, we must be truthful." Contact usatletters@time.com.

Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's Strategies

Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's Strategies U.S. President Donald Trump shake hands with Russian President Vladimir...
For Trump, Russia's nuclear saber-rattling may be a useful distractionNew Foto - For Trump, Russia's nuclear saber-rattling may be a useful distraction

There's something faintly undignified about a president of the United States being goaded by aminor Russian officialinto making nuclear threats on social media. But that's exactly what President Donald Trump has now done by ordering the repositioning of two US nuclear submarines, allowing himself to appear rattled by the hollow saber-rattling of Dmitry Medvedev, an outspoken but long-sidelined former Russian president. In a series of bombastic posts on social media, Medvedev, who has styled himself as a virulent anti-Western critic in recent years, slammed Trump's soon to expire deadline on Russia for a peace deal in Ukraine, saying that each new ultimatum was a "step towards war" – not between Russia and Ukraine, but "with his own country." The US president should remember "how dangerous the fabled 'Dead Hand' can be," Medvedev wrote, in a provocative reference to Russia's Soviet-era automatic nuclear retaliation system, which can initiate the launch of intercontinental ballistic missiles if it detects a nuclear strike. Trump's own secretary of state, Marco Rubio, played down the Russian's recent posts, pointing out that Medvedev isn't a decision-maker in Moscow anymore. It is a view shared by many Russians, for whom Medvedev is widely seen as politically irrelevant, with little authority,let alone the power to launch a nuclear strike. It begs the question as to why Trump would even engage with what he himself described as "foolish" statements, and issue such a strident public response which ratchets up the rhetoric between Washington and Moscow. One possible answer is that it's a convenient way for Trump to appear tough on Moscow, singling out a public figure often dubbed "little Dima" in Russia because of his small stature, without directly confronting the real power in the Kremlin, President Vladimir Putin, or indeed making any concrete changes to the US nuclear posture. Trump said his order for two nuclear submarines "to be positioned in the appropriate regions" came in case Medvedev's "foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that." But there are multiple US nuclear submarines, armed with hundreds of nuclear warheads, patrolling the world's oceans on any given day. Given the multi-thousand-mile range of the missiles they carry, as well as the vast size of Russia, it is unlikely any repositioning would make a significant difference to their ability to strike Russian targets. But, as ever, the timing is key. Trump's Mideast envoy, Steve Witkoff, in his dual role as a makeshift Russia mediator, is set to hold more talks with the Russian leadership in the coming days. He is likely to again press for a ceasefire as a deadline set by Trump, for the Kremlin to agree to peace in Ukraine or face stiff tariffs, is set to expire. Few realistically expect the Kremlin, which has stubbornly insistedon achieving its stated military objectivesbefore ending the Ukraine conflict, to back down. The latest escalating nuclear rhetoric is unlikely to change that hardline position. But, again, as Trump weighs – and possibly backs away from – the potentially self-damaging impact of imposing secondary sanctions on countries such as India and China who buy Russian oil, as he has threatened to do, the phantom of increased nuclear readiness may prove to be a useful distraction. In fact, creating a distraction from mounting political problems at home may be a welcome byproduct of the escalating nuclear rhetoric. Talk of mounting nuclear readiness towards Russia, which has more atomic weapons than any other country in the world, could overshadow more trifling domestic matters, like the Epstein scandal, for instance. Of course, any mention of nuclear escalation between the world's biggest nuclear superpowers rightly attracts serious attention. But the broader relationship between Washington and Moscow, though under renewed pressure, is nowhere near nuclear confrontation. And while the seemingly flippant use of nuclear threats by both nations may be concerning, it does not signal that a nuclear confrontation is on the way. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

For Trump, Russia’s nuclear saber-rattling may be a useful distraction

For Trump, Russia's nuclear saber-rattling may be a useful distraction There's something faintly undignified about a president of th...
Britain hopes a crackdown on people-smugglers' social media ads will help curb Channel crossingsNew Foto - Britain hopes a crackdown on people-smugglers' social media ads will help curb Channel crossings

LONDON (AP) — Britain says people who advertise fake passports or people-smuggling services on social medial could face up to five years in prison, in the government'slatest effortto deter migrants fromcrossing the English Channelin small boats. The government said Sunday that anyone convicted of creating online materials intended to break U.K. immigration law will face prison time and a large fine. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the aim was to stop the "brazen tactics on social media" used by smuggling gangs. "Selling the false promise of a safe journey to the U.K. and a life in this country — whether on or offline — simply to make money, is nothing short of immoral," she said. Assisting illegal immigration to the U.K. is already a crime, but officials believe a new offense — part of a border security bill currently going through Parliament — will give police and prosecutors more powers to disrupt gangs that send migrants on perilous journeys across one of the world's busiest shipping lanes. Prime Minister Keir Starmerhas said the crime gangs are a threat to global security and should be treated like terror networks. Since taking office a year ago, Starmer's center-left Labour Party government has adopted powers to seize the assets of people-smugglers, beefed up U.K. border surveillance and increased law-enforcementcooperation with Franceand other countries to disrupt the journeys. Despite that, more than 25,000 people have reached Britain by boat so far this year, an increase of 50% on the same period in 2024. Small boat crossings have become apotent political issue, fueled by pictures of smugglers piling migrants into overcrowded,leaky inflatable boats on the French coast. Opposition parties say the government's plans aren't working — though the government argues the problems built up during 14 years when the Conservative Party was in power, The Conservatives say Starmer should not have scrapped the previous government'scontentious and expensive planto send migrants arriving by boat ona one-way trip to Rwanda. "This is a panicked attempt to look tough after months of doing nothing," Conservativeimmigrationspokesman Chris Philp said. The government says it will take time to clear a backlog of applications that has left thousands of migrants stuck in temporary accommodation — often hotels — without the right to work. The hotels have becomeflashpoints for tension,attracting protests fueled by a mix of local concern, misinformation and anti-immigrant agitation.

Britain hopes a crackdown on people-smugglers' social media ads will help curb Channel crossings

Britain hopes a crackdown on people-smugglers' social media ads will help curb Channel crossings LONDON (AP) — Britain says people who a...
Will Rural America give up on Trump? These small-town activists think so.New Foto - Will Rural America give up on Trump? These small-town activists think so.

Dom Holmes, 28, has learned something important in 10 years of organizing progressives in rural Pennsylvania: You can't just show up when you need people to turn out to vote. You have to sit and listen to them. In recent weeks, when he's stopped to listen, he's gotten an earful aboutthe tax and spending billthe Republican-led Congress passed in July. "Folks are especially worried about how that's going to impact them at the local level," he said. They're particularly "outraged," he said, about cuts to food stamps and Medicaid and the likely damage to rural hospitals. "Folks should be aware of what the impact ‒ immediate and not ‒ will be on them and they should know who brought that impact to their community; who brought it home to them." His message is being echoed by rural organizers across the country who told USA TODAY that now is the time to talk with rural voters about the cuts in the GOP's landmark law ‒ and who voted for them. Rural Democrats see implementation of the GOP tax and spending law, combined with other changes from the Trump administration that they say will directly harm rural communities, as a moment Democrats can use to rebuild their brand in what has been MAGA country for a decade. And while national Democrats have their own plans for wading into these communities, the locals say they know these places and their neighbors best. They aren't sitting around, hoping a national group will swoop in. "I'm a rural Democrat. We don't really tend to wait around. There's already just a ton of stuff happening," said Matt Hildreth, Executive Director of RuralOrganizing.org. "The energy is already happening on the ground." More:When would Trump's tax and spending bill go into effect? Republicans control the House by a voting margin of 219 to 212 with four seats currently vacant. Democrats need to win four seats next year to take over the Senate. Gaining control of either chamber would allow Democrats to freeze many ofPresident Donald Trump'spolicy proposals with two years left in his term. Both parties expect the new spending law, and how voters think about it, to become one of the top issues in the midterm campaigns. There is a frustration growing in rural America and a willingness to be identified as a Democrat that they haven't seen in years, several progressive and Democratic organizing groups told USA TODAY. Building relationships and setting the narrative now is key, they said. "The frustration with Republicans is palpable," Hildreth said. "Maybe we never get the MAGA voters ‒ we probably never will ‒ but there's a ton of independents out there looking at this and just saying, 'man, this isn't what I voted for.'" Hildreth's group is already operating in congressional battleground districts in Iowa, Ohio and Pennsylvania, with a focus on getting people to talk about Medicaid. "Our whole strategy is built around locals, just the idea that the local messenger is most effective," he said. "We need to rebuild the Democratic footprint from the ground up, starting with those vocal locals and localizing the Democratic brand." The frustration he's hearing from rural communities is about how many of the changes brought by the Trump administration are hitting at once. Rural economies are more likely to rely on a single industry that have a strong connection to federal funding like farming, colleges or health care; all of which have seen changes in the last eight months. They've seen a freeze on farm subsidies as well as an end to public land revenue and clean energy subsidies. "When you put tariffs on top of Medicaid cuts and you put SNAP on top … and you put the rural services that are being defunded on top of everything else, it's just not sustainable." Hildreth said. "It's everything all at once and I honestly don't think anybody in the White House realizes that." The Democratic National Committee has invested in rural voter engagement for months, including billboard ads near rural hospitals that are likely to close because of the law, and contributed $22,500 a month to Democratic parties in red states andtown halls in Republican held districts. "Donald Trumphas been disastrous for our rural communities and the DNC will continue to show rural voters exactly how Trump and Republicans have betrayed them at every turn," DNC Deputy Executive Director Libby Schneider said in a statement. Republicans are spending the break talking up the tax and spending law, trying to combat Democrat's attempts to set the narrative that the bill is a tax cut for the rich that hurts the poor and middle class. "Democrats have cemented their image as snobby, out of touch, and indifferent to the struggles of everyday Americans. They've abandoned rural America by voting against tax cuts, border security, and small businesses. While Democrats recycle fear and slogans, Republicans are delivering real results for working families," said NRCC Spokesman Mike Marinella in a statement. ANRCC memoto House Republicansobtained by Politicotells members that "the best defense is a good offense," and says that "this is a critical opportunity to continue to define how this legislation will help every voter and push back on Democrat fearmongering." It highlights that Republican voters support work requirements and removing ineligible recipients from Medicaid insurance coverage, but the five-page memo doesn't explain how the GOP members of Congress should address the bill's expected hit to rural hospitals. Stephanie Porta, campaign manager of Battleground Alliance PAC, said progressive advocates in rural areas need to capitalize on theprotests that millions of Americans have attendedthis spring and summer ‒ not just in big cities, but in rural towns. Her organization, a coalition of over 30 national labor, community, and advocacy organizations, has pledged $50 million to try to flip more than 35 vulnerable Republican-held districts in 2026. They want to build on the protests and lean on local organizers to tailor education campaigns to their districts, some of which don't even have a Democratic candidate yet. "They're putting together plans based on what their district looks like and what their member of Congress has done to make sure that the public is educated and aware and that those members of Congress know that the public is unhappy with what they have done," she said. They've already planned for backpack giveaways as school begins, mock welcome home parties at airports for the members of Congress and canvassing to inform voters about the impacts of the bill. "There are protests, and then the next step after protest is building the awesome momentum to reach even more people," Porta said. Lily Franklin often drives 10 minutes between houses when she knocks on doors in the Appalachian district where she is running to become a delegate to the Virginia House. She says people are worried about the future of rural health care access and Medicaid. "There are a lot of hospitals that are at threat in this district, in this region. Folks are already driving an hour to an hour-and-a-half just to seek care," she said. "All of these proposed cuts are going to disproportionately hit southwest Virginia and it is motivating folks to speak up and say, hey this isn't what we wanted." When she knocks on doors, she spends most of the time listening, she said. She grew up in the area and her family has been there for generations. "They just haven't had anybody show up for them and meet them where they are at, and so half of the battle is talking to voters at their doors, hearing their stories and listening to them," she said. "People just want to be heard." Even though she is running for the state general assembly, people want to talk about how worried they are about the future of rural health care access and Medicaid, she said. They are also worried about other aspects of the new law, like cuts to food benefits and energy assistance, which states will have to help pay for, she said. Franklin outperformed both PresidentJoe Bidenin 2020 andVice President Harrisin 2024. She lost her bid to represent the largely rural district that includes Blacksburg and Virginia Tech by just 183 votes. Franklin said several national groups have contacted her 2025 campaign because of how closely she came to flipping such a competitive seat in a rural area. She said Democrats can't swoop in with their messaging and expect it to resonate in every district. "We've often tried to come up with a message that's hyper-tested in a lab somewhere, but realistically people just want to be heard. That's the secret sauce," she said. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Will Rural America give up on Trump? These activists think so.

Will Rural America give up on Trump? These small-town activists think so.

Will Rural America give up on Trump? These small-town activists think so. Dom Holmes, 28, has learned something important in 10 years of org...

 

VS POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com