Pentagon cuts off key air defense for Ukraine as Russian drone attacks skyrocketNew Foto - Pentagon cuts off key air defense for Ukraine as Russian drone attacks skyrocket

WASHINGTON −Russian drone attacks on Ukrainehave skyrocketed in recent weeks as thePentagon continues to hold updeliveries of key air defense supplies, including Patriot interceptors. Russian drone strikes haveincreased by roughly 500%in June and July, compared with earlier this year, according to the Institute for the Study of War. "The Ukrainians are getting pounded at an unprecedented level of intensity," said Fred Kagan, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. "They need air defense of all sorts urgently." Russia pummeled Ukraine overnight on July 3 with the largest drone and missile attack of the more-than-three-year conflict, with more than 530 drones and at least 10 missiles launched mostly at the capital, according to Ukraine's air force. At least two people were killed and more than 90 injured across the country as attacks continued into July 7. Over the past week, Russia launched around 1,270 drones and 39 missiles at Ukraine, according to Ukrainian PresidentVolodymyr Zelenskyy. The escalation comes as the Pentagon has paused some weapons deliveries to Ukraine, including key air defense weapons like Patriots. Chief Pentagon Spokesperson Sean Parnell called it a "capability review ... to ensure U.S. military aid aligns with our defense priorities." Democratic lawmakers said Ukraine's air defenses were their largest worry. Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said air defense is the "biggest concern ... without question" after the Pentagon's pause on weapons deliveries. Smith said concerns that military aid to Ukraine and Israel is depleting the United States' own stockpiles were not a "legitimate excuse." "Stockpiles that I've seen are no lower than they've been during the last three and a half years," since Russia first invaded Ukraine, he said. "I'm torn between whether or not it's just really unintelligent analysis of what ournational security needs truly are," or an "excuse to let Putin have his way in Ukraine," Smith added. Sens. Jack Reed and Chris Coons, two top Democrats on the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the aid pause the "latest and most dramatic blow to our support for Ukraine" in a July 3 joint statement. "This assistance – including vital air defense interceptors and artillery munitions – was provided by Congress and designated to be delivered months ago," they said, referring to military aid procured through contractsauthorized by Congressthat does not draw directly from U.S. stockpiles. Kagan said concentrated Russian drone strikes "facilitate" ballistic missiles that penetrate Ukraine's defenses. A lack of Patriot interceptors "leaves Ukraine open to the Russians just shooting their ballistic missiles whenever they want." Patriots are Ukraine's only air defense system that can down ballistic missiles, he added. In recent days, both Zelenskyy and PresidentDonald Trumphave nodded to Ukraine's need for air defense, but a deal has yet to come through. "We had an extremely fruitful conversation with the President of the United States yesterday, during which we discussed air defense," Zelenskyy said ina July 5 video statement. More:Russia continues record-setting aerial attacks, US cuts off arms shipments to Ukraine Trump seemed in agreement, telling reporters aboard Air Force One the same day that Ukraine would need Patriots "for defense." "They're going to need something because they're being hit pretty hard," he said. Trump saidhe was "very unhappy"with a call he held days earlier with Russian PresidentVladimir Putin. "He wants to go all the way, just keep killing people," Trump said. Trump brieflycut off all military aid to Ukrainein March after an Oval Office meeting with Zelenskyy devolved into a verbal fight. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Russian drone attacks on Ukraine skyrocket amid Pentagon aid cutoff

Pentagon cuts off key air defense for Ukraine as Russian drone attacks skyrocket

Pentagon cuts off key air defense for Ukraine as Russian drone attacks skyrocket WASHINGTON −Russian drone attacks on Ukrainehave skyrockete...
Maine and a GOP lawmaker who ID'd a transgender athlete online agree lawsuit is now mootNew Foto - Maine and a GOP lawmaker who ID'd a transgender athlete online agree lawsuit is now moot

PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — Attorneys for the state of Maine and a conservative lawmaker who identified a transgender teen student athlete online now agree that the lawmaker's appeal over her loss of voting rights for her post is now moot. Republican state Rep.Laurel Libbyidentified the athlete in a February social media post that went viral and called into question the student's gender identity, bringing attention to the issue of transgender teens participating in sports. Maine's Democratic-controlled House of Representatives censured Libby for violating the House code of ethics and blocked her from speaking and voting on the floor. Libby sued, and theU.S. Supreme Court ruledin May that the Maine legislature must allow her to vote. Lawmakers voted in June to halt the restrictions. Maine Assistant Attorney General Kimberly Patwardhan said in court papers filed late last month that there are "no longer any restrictions on Rep. Libby's ability to vote or debate" and "this appeal is now moot." Libby said in a statement Monday that she will "not contest the AG's mootness argument" and added that she never provided the apology House Democrats asked of her. "I believe this case sends a clear message: elected officials do not surrender their constitutional rights at the Capitol steps -- and neither do the people who sent them there," Libby said. The appeal still needs to be formally dismissed by a court, but it is essentially dropped "given that both parties are in agreement about the mootness issue," said Danna Hayes, a spokesperson for the attorney general's office. Libby's post was about a high school athlete who won a girls' track competition. She said the student had previously competed in boys' track. Her post included a photo of the student and first-name identification in quotation marks. Thepostpreceded a public disagreement betweenPresident Donald Trumpand DemocraticGov. Janet Millsover the subject of transgender athletes.President Donald Trumpsigned an executive order designed to ban transgender athletes from participating in girls' and women's sports earlier this year. At a meeting ofgovernorsat the White House in February, Trump characterized Maine as out of compliance with order. Mills told Trump: "We'll see you in court." The Trump administration then launched investigations into Maine's Title IX compliance. An attorney for the statesaidin April that the state and federal government are at an impasse over the subject.

Maine and a GOP lawmaker who ID'd a transgender athlete online agree lawsuit is now moot

Maine and a GOP lawmaker who ID'd a transgender athlete online agree lawsuit is now moot PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — Attorneys for the state ...
Republican Chris Carr raises $1.25M more for 2026 Georgia governor bidNew Foto - Republican Chris Carr raises $1.25M more for 2026 Georgia governor bid

ATLANTA (AP) — GeorgiaAttorney General Chris Carrsaid Monday he raised another $1.25 million for his 2026 gubernatorial bid from Feb. 1 to June 30. The Republican announced the fundraising totals to The Associated Press on Monday, although he hasn't yet filed an official report with the state Ethics Commission. Those reports are due Tuesday. Carr raised $2.2 millionfrom November through mid-January, but couldn't raise money while lawmakers were in session from mid-January until the end of March. He didn't immediately say how much he has spent of the nearly $3.5 million he has raised. Carr is the only major GOP candidate who has announced for the race in Georgia, which saw titanic battles for the governor's chair between RepublicanBrian Kempand DemocratStacey Abramsin 2018 and 2022. Abrams lost both races, and no Democrat has won a governor's race in Georgia since Roy Barnes in 1998. Republicans argue Georgia needs the stability of continued Republican control. Democrats are meanwhile trying to prove their successes in other races were not a fluke. Former President Joe Biden won Georgia in 2020 and U.S. Sens. Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff were elected to the Senate in runoffs in January 2021. In 2022, Warnock beat Republican Herschel Walker in a runoff to claim a full six-year term. Carr took theunprecedented step of announcinghis run for governor in November in part because he said he needed to get an early jump on fundraising. He could face Republican rivals with enough personal wealth to fund their own campaigns. Republican Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, whose family has made a fortune running and supplying gas stations, is expected to announce his bid for governor in the coming weeks. Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who sold a substantial engineering company, could also make a bid in the Republican primary. Carr said in a statement that his numbers show "that kind of energy can't be bought — it's earned, and we're ready to deliver." Carr has aligned closely with Kemp but could face opposition fromPresident Donald Trumpand his supporters in a primary election. Jones has been close to Trump and would likely angle for his endorsement. Fueled by displeasure that Carr didn't backTrump's attempts to overturn his 2020 presidential electionloss in Georgia, Trump in 2022endorsed a primary opponentwho lost to Carr. Last week, the two leading Democrats said they had each collected about $1.1 million in early fundraising. Former Atlanta MayorKeisha Lance Bottomssaid she loaned her campaign $200,000 and collected $900,000 from donors, while state Sen.Jason Estevessaid he made a much smaller donation to his campaign with the rest coming from donors.

Republican Chris Carr raises $1.25M more for 2026 Georgia governor bid

Republican Chris Carr raises $1.25M more for 2026 Georgia governor bid ATLANTA (AP) — GeorgiaAttorney General Chris Carrsaid Monday he raise...
Jeffrey Epstein had no 'client list,' died by suicide, DOJ and FBI concludeNew Foto - Jeffrey Epstein had no 'client list,' died by suicide, DOJ and FBI conclude

WASHINGTON ― The Justice Department and FBI say they have found no evidence thatJeffrey Epsteinkept a "client list," contradicting Attorney GeneralPam Bondi'spast suggestionthat such a list from the convicted sex offender and financier existed. A review of Epstein materials in the U.S. government's procession also found no evidence Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions or that he was murdered while in custody,according to a memo detailingthe Justice Department's and FBI's findings. The memo,first reported July 6 by Axiosand laterABC News, comes after PresidentDonald Trump's supporters have pushed for the administration to release details about Epstein's associates after Trump during the 2024 presidential campaignendorsed doing so. More:Jeffrey Epstein document release highlights his sprawling connections across states Bondi, when asked about releasing an Epstein "client list"during a February Fox News interview, said: "It's sitting on my desk right now to review." Justice Department officials did not respond to USA TODAY for a request to comment. Despite many conspiracies about Epstein's death in a New York federal prison, the FBI concludedhe died by suicide on Aug. 10, 2019as initially determined by New York City's medical examiner and past investigations, according to the memo. That conclusion is also supported by video evidence of the prison unit where Epstein was housed. The memo says the video ‒ which it plans to release publicly online ‒ confirms that nobody entered any of the tiers in Epstein's housing unit from the time his cell was locked at 10:40 p.m. EDT on Aug. 9, 2019 until around 6:30 a.m. the next morning. "One of our highest priorities is combatting child exploitation and bringing justice to victims," the memo says. "Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither of those ends. To that end, while we have labored to provide the public with maximum information regarding Epstein and ensured examination of any evidence in the government's possession, it is the determination of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted." More:Jeffrey Epstein was a convicted sex offender by 2008. Why did the powerful stick with him? The memo says the FBI reviewed more than 300 gigabytes of data and physical evidence during digital searches of databases, hard drives and network drives. It also conducted physical searches of locked cabinets, desks, closets and other areas where materials from the Epstein investigation had been stored. The Epstein files include large volumes of images of Epstein and victims who were minors or appeared to be minors, according to the memo, as well as more than 10,000 videos and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography. "Through this review, we found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials and will not permit the release of child pornography," the memo says. More:The death of Jeffrey Epstein: Fact, fiction, confusion and a warden reassigned The review confirmed prior findings that Epstein harmed more than 1,000 victims. Materials reviewed by the FBI included personal details about the victims, including their names, physical descriptions, places of birth, associates and employment history. As his relationship publicly imploded with Trump last month,Elon Muskalleged in a social media post that Trump's nameis mentioned in the Epstein files and claimed that's the reason the undisclosed classified documents had not been released. Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX and a former White House adviser,later deleted the post. Muskin a series of July 7 posts on X,the social media platform he owns, criticized the Trump administration's claims in its new report. He posted an image that reads, "The Official Jeffrey Epstein Pedophile Arrest Counter," which is set to "0000." "This is the final straw,"Musk later postedregarding the Trump administration's previews promises to release the "Epstein list." More:Elon Musk escalates feud with Trump: 'Time to drop the really big bomb' Bondi has faced pressure from Trump's MAGA base to deliver big findings in the Epstein files. But after hyping up the release of declassified government files on Epstein, Bondi on Feb. 27 disclosed about 200 pages of documents that implicated no one else in Epstein's orbit other than Epstein, who died in a federal prison in 2019. The Trump-appointed attorney general in Aprilcited a review of "tens of thousands of videos"as the reason for a delay in releasing additional Epstein documents. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Jeffrey Epstein had no 'client list,' died by suicide: DOJ and FBI

Jeffrey Epstein had no 'client list,' died by suicide, DOJ and FBI conclude

Jeffrey Epstein had no 'client list,' died by suicide, DOJ and FBI conclude WASHINGTON ― The Justice Department and FBI say they hav...
Annoying People to DeathNew Foto - Annoying People to Death

The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture.Sign up for it here. According to the White House, the One Big Beautiful Bill, the president's signature second-term domestic legislation, does not cut Medicaid. According to any number of budget analysts, including Congress's own, it guts the health program, bleeding it of $1 trillion in financing and eliminating coverage for 10 million people. The White House has found a simple way to square this technocratic circle: lie. A trillion dollars in cuts is not a cut; stripping 10 million people of health insurance does not constitute shrinking the program; the president never said "lock her up"; Joe Biden did not win the 2020 election; up is down and down is up. Other Republicans are adopting a more complicated form of explanatory geometry. The law implements a nationwide work requirement for Medicaid. Able-bodied adults will have to prove that they are employed, volunteering, or in school in exchange for coverage. "If you are able to work and you refuse to do so, you are defrauding the system," Speaker Mike Johnsonexplained on CBS. "You're cheating the system, and no one in the country believes that that's right. So there's a moral component to what we're doing." The law does notcutMedicaid, in this telling. Itprotectsthe program from abuse. Johnson's explanation is no less galling than Donald Trump's lies. The Medicaid work requirement will not strengthen the program, improve the labor market, or kick lazy cheaters off government benefits. Rather, it will saddle taxpayers with billions of dollars of new costs and low-income Americans with hundreds of millions of hours of busywork. Red tape will cause millions of people to lose health coverage, some of whom will perish because they cannot access care. Republicans are not protecting Medicaid. They are voting to annoy their own constituents to death. Why does Medicaid need a work requirement in the first place? To prevent the safety net from becoming a hammock, Republicans love to say. But most people on Medicaid are already working if they can work. And Medicaid doesn't provide its enrollees with cash or a cash-like payment, as the country's unemployment-insurance, welfare, Social Security, and SNAP programs do. You can't eat an insurance card. You can't pay your rent with the guarantee of low co-pays for ambulatory care. Because insurance does not help recipients make ends meet, it does notshrink the labor market, as proved by a randomized controlled trial. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, 64 percent of nondisabled adults on Medicaid have a job. Most of the others are not working because they have medical problems or significant caretaking responsibilities, or because they are attending school. Just 8 percent of nondisabled adults seem to bein the categoryof folks Johnson hopes will be spurred to work by the threat of losing their health coverage. They aren't 28-year-old guys signing up for public insurance so they can play video games all day. They are retirees and people who can't find work in their community. Thus, the work requirement should really be understood as a work-reportingrequirement. Starting in 2027, nondisabled adults will have to log in and tell Uncle Sam what they do with their time in order to afford cancer screenings and bloodwork. Each state with an expanded Medicaid program will have to pay a contractor to create, test, and launch a complex intake-and-verification system in 18 months—six, really, because the Department of Health and Human Services is not expected to release detailed rules on the new requirement until midway through next year. In 2019, the Government Accountability Office found that states had spent as much as $463 per beneficiarysetting upsuch systems in the past. Georgia, the only state that currently has a Medicaid work requirement, spends $9 onoverheadfor every $1 it spends on medical care through the initiative. More than 20 million Americans will have to set up accounts to let the state know that they are in compliance with the work requirement, out of compliance, or not subject to it. This likely means collecting documents, uploading them, waiting for verifications, submitting sensitive personal data, and appealing incorrect determinations, all on what, history shows, will surely be a clunky, faulty system backed by a too-small cadre of overworked and underpaid civil servants. A broken laptop or a faulty internet connection might cause an individual to get rejected; a missed phone call from a caseworker might lead to a person missing out on care. Washington is shifting the burden of public administration onto individuals, and counting onpeople to fail. In general, work requirements are far better at weeding out worthy participants than they are at motivating noncompliant ones. Roughly 240,000 Georgians are eligible for the state'swork-for-Medicaid initiative, which covers very poor nondisabled adults. Only 5,500 are actually enrolled, thanks to thecomplexityof the program's rules and theimpossibilityof its portal. Arkansas kicked nearly 20,000 peopleoff Medicaidwhen it required applicants to prove that they were working in 2018 and 2019; the change had no effect on employment. One analysis of the One Big Beautiful Bill suggests that each "appropriate" disenrollment from Medicaid will cost taxpayers $5,000 in bureaucratic overhead—not far off from how much Medicaid spends per person to begin with. Trump's law doesn't protect Medicaid. It requires Americans to spend hundreds of millions of hours a year filling out tedious, unnecessary paperwork. It will cause millions of Americans to lose their health coverage, limiting their access to care and forcing them into debt. An estimated50,000 peoplewill die each year—many thanks to red tape. Article originally published atThe Atlantic

Annoying People to Death

Annoying People to Death The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ide...

 

VS POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com