Beshear on potential White House bid: 'I'll think about it after next year'New Foto - Beshear on potential White House bid: 'I'll think about it after next year'

Gov. Andy Beshear (D-Ky.) said he'llconsider a 2028 White House bidin an article published Friday while seething over the "big, beautiful bill" backed by Republicans in Congress. "Two years ago, I wouldn't have considered [running for president]. But if I'm somebody who could maybe heal and bring the country back together, I'll think about it after next year," Beshear toldVanity Fair. The Kentucky governor's term ends in 2027 and he's pledged to complete his tenure in office before launching another political bid for a higher office. Fellow party members Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.), Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Gov.Josh Shapiro (D-Pa.) have also been listed aspotential contendersfor the presidency as Democrats look to claw back the executive branch after their November loss. Political pundits have suggested the GOP-authored spending package will have a significant impact on midterm elections and cycles that follow as Americans grapple with the possibility of losing their healthcare coverage, a top issue for Beshear. "What the Republican majority is getting wrong is that the American people don't view health care in a partisan way. They want to be able to see their doctor when they need to, and they want their neighbor to be able to see their doctor," Beshear, Kentucky's former attorney general, said in the interview. "No state will be able to compensate for the level of devastation that this bill would cause. What they're doing is immoral, and it's certainly not Christian," he added. The legislation is set to remove millions from Medicaid and introduce stricter work requirements for food stamp benefits and other social services. However, Beshear said in order to break through on the cuts, Democrats will need to help voters conceptualize the ongoing impact of the bill. "If Democrats say this bill is going to increase food insecurity, their point's not going to get through. If they say people are going to go hungry, it will," he said. "And we have to explain not just what we disagree with in this bill, but why. And my why is my faith. The parable of the fishes and the loaves is in every book of the gospel. My faith teaches me that in a country that grows enough food for everyone that no one should starve." Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.

Beshear on potential White House bid: ‘I’ll think about it after next year’

Beshear on potential White House bid: 'I'll think about it after next year' Gov. Andy Beshear (D-Ky.) said he'llconsider a 2...
GOP eyes redistricting in Ohio and Texas as it looks to bolster slim majorityNew Foto - GOP eyes redistricting in Ohio and Texas as it looks to bolster slim majority

Republicans are eyeing potential redistricting opportunities in Ohio and Texas as they seek extra cushion to protect their thin majority in the House next year. In Ohio, redistricting lawsmandate a redrawahead of 2026 because the last map passed without bipartisan support. And in Texas, redistrictingcould be addedto an upcoming special session agenda as the White Housereportedly pushesthe Lone Star State to consider redrawing to protect the party's numbers. Defending a narrow 220-212 majority, Republicans are bracing for a competitive election cycle as they look to defy traditional headwinds typically associated with the president's party in midterm years. "I think the Speaker and party leadership look at even a handful of districts as really important, particularly if the natural trend — given the president's popularity at this point and given historic midterm conditions — means that the Republican Party starts out assuming they're going to lose a couple districts right off the bat," said Justin Levitt, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University who founded the database "All About Redistricting." "Ohio is going to have to redraw, one way or the other. Texas is mulling whether to redraw. And there are a lot of competing pressures." Each state redraws its maps once a decade, after the U.S. Census. But in Ohio, the lines used for the last four years are up for a redraw under a wonky state law that effectively sped up the expiration date because they didn't earn bipartisan support. Should Republicans decide to make the maps more competitive, Ohio Democratic Reps. Marcy Kaptur and Emilia Sykes, who represent Ohio's 9th and 13th Congressional Districts respectively, would likely be impacted. President Trump won Kaptur's district, which includes Toledo, by close to 7 points, while Sykes's seat, which includes Akron, was essentially tied by Trump and former Vice President Harris in 2024,according to The Downballot. Both are already competitive for Democrats, though both Kaptur and Sykes have been strong candidates despite the political terrain. "It's no surprise that special interests in Washington and Columbus want to ignore the voters and rig the game," Sykes campaign spokesman Justin Barasky said in a statement. Kaptur campaign political director David Zavac projected confidence over the congresswoman's election next year, while also pointing out that the state will have seen three different maps this decade alone. "The Congresswoman looks forward to a spirited campaign next year," Zavac said in a statement, "but will let the GOP focus on what will surely be another messy primary ahead once they finish their illegal gerrymandering process to try and rig the maps further in their favor." The Ohio Constitutionlays out detailed rulesfor drawing House districts , meaning that only certain counties and cities can be divided, some of that based on population stipulations. Ahead of the required 2025 redistricting, Democrats had sought to pass an amendment to the state Constitution last year that would have reformed the redistricting process in the state, giving the party a better chance of making seats more competitive between the parties. But voters rejected the ballot measure amid confusion over the amendment language; the Ohio Ballot Board approved language that said the amendment would "repeal constitutional protections against gerrymandering" when its supporters said the initiative stated it would do the opposite. While the redistricting process offers Republicans a unique opportunity to reconfigure better maps for its House members, it's not without its own perils. "I do think the best pressure that could force them to do some things that are more reasonable would be Republicans in nearby districts saying, 'Don't carve up our districts, we like our [districts], we don't want them to change,'" said former state Democratic Party Chair David Pepper. In Texas, where there are no specific timing rules for re-making maps, state lawmakers arereportedly under pressurefrom the White House and national Republicans to consider making mid-decade changes that could help shore up GOP numbers. The state legislature just gaveled out their latest regular session, with thenextnot slated until 2027. But amid the chatter about redistricting, Gov. Greg Abbott (R) called a special session to kick off July 21. Though redistricting isn't among the governor'sofficial "initial agenda" items, there's still time for the matter to be added to the docket or included in a future special session. "The Republicans in Congress are looking at a very, very narrow majority, and they're looking for every opportunity around the country to increase that majority with things like redistricting [and] the election. They're gonna use every tool at their disposal to do that," said Texas Republican strategist Brendan Steinhauser. "Texas is a very red state, so if they can pick up two seats or three seats, then they might give it a try. And even if it makes a seat in a very deep red state a little more competitive, so be it. I think that's some of the thinking," he said. One Republican strategist who requested anonymity to speak candidly told The Hill that the party will be on "offense" regardless of how either state's map shakes out ahead of 2026. A second GOP strategist pointed out that there's more Democrats – 13 – that won in Trump districts, while there's only three Republicans hailing from districts won by former Vice President Harris in 2024 overall. "The numbers are in our favor," the GOP strategist said. "It's a game of inches right now." If Republicans do decide to redraw lines in Texas, it could blunt challenges to themapsthat Texas drew after the 2020 census, includingan ongoing trial in El Pasoin which voter advocates allege that the maps discriminate against some Black and Latino voters. The 2021 mapswere already seen as shoring up Republican power in the Lone Star State, but proponents of redistricting reportedly think the GOP's 25-12 congressional edge could expand by several seats. The situation has given some lawmakers a sense of deja vu. Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) was among the more than 50 state lawmakers who fled Texas for Oklahoma to deny Republicans a quorum in 2003 as the GOP revisited drawing the state's congressional lines. Texas Republicans, however, were ultimately successful at redrawing favorable lines for their party. "It's just a total partisan power grab that's gonna completely mess with representation in Texas," Castro, who was a freshman during the 2003 walkout, told The Hill last month. "And I hope that cooler minds will prevail, and they'll do redistricting when they're supposed to, which is after the end of the decade." Another layer of uncertainty is how the courts could weigh in on potential redistricting challenges. Both Texas and Ohio have conservative majorities on the state Supreme Courts, but legal challenges over redistricting from other states have been brought up to the U.S. Supreme Court. While the high court, too, has a conservative majority, itnotably struck down Alabama's maps in 2023, saying they likely violated the Voting Rights Act. But while shifting voters from solidly red districts to bluer ones could make Democratic-held seats more competitive, it could similarly blunt the edge of some now-safe GOP seats. The House Democrats' campaign suggested in a statement that the predicament is a lose-lose situation for Republicans. "House Republicans are running scared because they know they will lose the House majority next November, and their only solutions are corrupt attempts to suppress battleground voters' voices," Madison Andrus, a spokeswoman for the House Democrats' campaign arm, said in a statement. "Any changes they try to make to existing maps may endanger existing Republican-held seats," she continued, "and in an environment where the public is wildly unhappy with the Republican agenda of broken promises, they should be careful what they wish for." Ahead of the midterms, though, that might be a risk some are willing to take to put more districts in play for Republicans. "Republican redistricting was key to flipping the House in 2022, preserving the majority in 2024, and can help defend it again in 2026," said Adam Kincaid, executive director of the National Republican Redistricting Trust. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.

GOP eyes redistricting in Ohio and Texas as it looks to bolster slim majority

GOP eyes redistricting in Ohio and Texas as it looks to bolster slim majority Republicans are eyeing potential redistricting opportunities i...
Gov. Tony Evers' re-election decision looms over battleground WisconsinNew Foto - Gov. Tony Evers' re-election decision looms over battleground Wisconsin

In one of the nation's most closely divided battleground states, there's one big question on both parties' minds: Is Gov. Tony Evers going to run for a third term next year? The answer will have reverberating consequences in Wisconsin, where one of five Democratic-controlled governorships is up for grabs in 2026 in states President Donald Trump won last year. Evers, 73, has said he would announce whether he'd run again after he reached a budget deal with Republicans, who control both chambers of the Legislature. But with anagreement rapidlysigned, sealed and delivered last week, some Wisconsin Democrats are growing impatient for his decision. "I'd like to see him make a decision, hopefully sooner rather than later, because I do think we've got a lot of elections that we need to be winning and focusing on," Democratic state Sen. Kelda Roys, who ran against Evers in the 2018 Democratic gubernatorial primary,said last month. "If the governor makes a decision, I hope that's going to be soon." One dynamic hanging over Evers' decision is the possibility he wouldn't have to deal with a combative Legislature fully controlled by Republicans, as he has throughout his tenure. A landmark 2023 Wisconsin Supreme Court decision from anewly installed liberal majorityprompted the state's gerrymandered maps to be redrawn, giving Democratic amuch more realistic pathto taking control of either the state Assembly or Senate in 2026. "One question he's weighing is, 'Do I try to stay around for one more term and possibly have one, if not both, lower chambers to work with, versus just trying to haggle with Republicans and push the veto pen every single f-----g time," said one Democratic operative in the state who requested anonymity to speak candidly about the race. Some Democrats also feel that Evers, with the benefit of incumbency, still represents the party's best shot at winning next year's gubernatorial election. "There's no question that Evers is the most equipped to win next year," said Joe Zepecki, a Milwaukee-based Democratic strategist who finished second in last month's race to be the chair of the Wisconsin Democratic Party. "Why would we not want to have an incumbent Democratic governor who is the most popular politician in the state, beloved by the Democratic base. That makes all the sense in the world in what will be a good political environment for Democrats." But othershave warnedthat Democrats should not continue to rely on septuagenarian candidates and should clear the way for new voices, particularly following their experience with then-President Joe Biden in 2024. Evers' allies have hit back at that narrative, pointing to recent polling. One Wisconsin Democratic operative familiar with Evers' thinking, who requested anonymity to speak candidly while Evers' decision-making process is ongoing, added, "That just doesn't match with what we're hearing from Democrats and from the Marquette Poll." That refers to aMarquette University Law School poll of registered Wisconsin voters releasedlast month showing that Democrats remain widely supportive of Evers running again — even as the general electorate in the purple state remains more split. The survey found that 83% of Democrats said they supported Evers seeking a third term. That poll also found that 42% of all registered voters said they wanted Evers to run again, compared to 55% who said they did not. That support level, the pollsters noted, is still strong by historical standards. Back in 2016, ahead of Republican Gov. Scott Walker's decision to run for a third term, the same poll found that just 36% of registered voters wanted him to run a third time, compared to 61% who did not. Walker ran again in 2018 and lost to Evers. Evers' approval ratings in the poll — 48% of voters said they approved of his job performance, compared to 46% who said they didn't — is in line with the levels he's seen in that survey throughout his two terms in office in the swing state. If Evers ultimately declines to run, there are several Democrats who could seek to replace him, including state Attorney General Josh Kaul, Lt. Gov. Sara Rodriguez, Secretary of State Sarah Godlewski, Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley and Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson. But some Wisconsin Democrats expressed concern that an Evers exit could lead to an expensive and divisive primary. "It would be a big field if he doesn't run. That could get messy," said the Democratic operative familiar with Evers' thinking. Representatives for the political operations of Kaul, Rodriguez and Crowley didn't respond to questions. Johnson spokesperson Thad Nation said in an email that "the Mayor has deep respect for that leadership and certainly hopes the Governor will choose to run again," but that "if Governor Evers decides not to seek re-election, Mayor Johnson would be in a strong position to enter the race." Evers' decision isn't likely to have much bearing on who decides to run for the Republican nomination. Currently, the only declared candidate in the race is Josh Schoemann, the county executive of Washington County, an exurban area northwest of Milwaukee. Alsoweighing bidsare businessman Eric Hovde, who narrowly lost a 2024 U.S. Senate race to Democrat Tammy Baldwin, and Tim Michels, who lost to Evers in 2022. U.S. Rep. Tom Tiffany alsohasn't ruled outa campaign. Strategists in both parties said that Evers' decision to wait until after a budget deal was reached with state lawmakers could present the governor with an opportunity to leave on a high note, or help build his case for a third term. "Evers got most of what he wanted. He is now in a position to say, 'I've done what I needed to do. I got funding back to UW [the University of Wisconsin system], I got funding for child care, we've saved the kids in Wisconsin.' We've got a kids budget — I think that gives him an out," said Brandon Scholz, a Wisconsin Republican strategist. "He can go out on top." Evers' allies said delaying his announcement provided him with maximum leverage during budget discussions with Republicans. "I think it probably did make better his ability to work with Republicans in the Legislature to get to what appears to now be a reasonable budget," Zepecki said. Responding to questions about whether the governor would be announcing his decision imminently now that the state budget process has wrapped, Evers senior adviser Sam Roecker said only that "the governor has been clear he won't make a decision on 2026 until the budget process concludes." But some Democrats said the prospects of a friendlier Legislature, Evers' poll numbers and the ability to avoid a fractured primary all pointed in one direction. "I think he has decided, and I think he will run," Zepecki said. "If I had to bet money today, that's where we are."

Gov. Tony Evers' re-election decision looms over battleground Wisconsin

Gov. Tony Evers' re-election decision looms over battleground Wisconsin In one of the nation's most closely divided battleground sta...
How Trump's tariffs will raise home construction costsNew Foto - How Trump's tariffs will raise home construction costs

NBC News modeled out a 3-bedroom home and found tariffs added more than $4,000 to total costs.

How Trump's tariffs will raise home construction costs

How Trump's tariffs will raise home construction costs NBC News modeled out a 3-bedroom home and found tariffs added more than $4,000 to...
Trump and GOP target ballots arriving after Election Day that delay counts and feed conspiracy fearsNew Foto - Trump and GOP target ballots arriving after Election Day that delay counts and feed conspiracy fears

ATLANTA (AP) — PresidentDonald Trumpand other Republicans have long criticized states that take weeks to count their ballots after Election Day. This year has seen a flurry of activity to address it. Part of Trump'sexecutive order on elections, signed in March butheld up by lawsuits, takes aim at one of the main reasons for late vote counts: Many states allow mailed ballots to be counted even if they arrive after Election Day. The U.S. Supreme Court last month said it would consider whethera challenge in Illinoiscan proceed in a case that is among severalRepublican-backed lawsuitsseeking to impose an Election Day deadline for mail ballots. At least three states — Kansas, North Dakota andUtah— passed legislation this year that eliminated a grace period for receiving mailed ballots, saying they now need to be in by Election Day. Even in California, whereweekslong vote countingis a frequentsource of frustrationanda target of Republican criticism, a bill attempting to speed up the process is moving through the Democratic-controlled Legislature. Order asserts federal law prohibits counting late ballots The ballot deadline section of Trump'swide-ranging executive orderrelies on an interpretation of federal law that establishes Election Day for federal elections. He argues this means all ballots must be received by that date. "This is like allowing persons who arrive 3 days after Election Day, perhaps after a winner has been declared, to vote in person at a former voting precinct, which would be absurd,"the executive orderstates. It follows a pattern for the president, who hasrepeatedly questionedthe legitimacy of such ballots even though there isno evidencethey are the source of widespread fraud. The issue is tied closely to his complaints abouthow long it takes to count ballots, his desire for results on election night and hisfalse claimsthat overnight "dumps" of vote counts point to a rigged election in2020, when he lost to Democrat Joe Biden. But ballots received after Election Day, in addition to being signed and dated by the voter, must be postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service indicating they were completed and dropped off on or before the final day of voting. Accepting late-arriving ballots has not been a partisan issue historically. States as different as California and Mississippi allow them, while Colorado and Indiana do not. "There is nothing unreliable or insecure about a ballot that comes back after Election Day," said Steve Simon, the chief election official in Minnesota, which has an Election Day deadline. In his executive order, most of which ispaused by the courts, Trump directs the attorney general to "take all necessary action" to enforce federal law against states that include late-arriving ballots in their final counts for federal elections. He also directs the U.S. Election Assistance Commission to condition federal funding on compliance. Trump's rhetoric motivates Republican states Republicans in five states have passed legislation since the 2020 election moving the mail ballot deadline to Election Day, according to the Voting Rights Lab, which tracks election legislation. Earlier this year, GOP lawmakers inKansasended the state's practice of accepting mail ballots up to three days after Election Day, a change that will take effect for next year's midterms.Problems with mail deliveryhad prompted Kansas to add the grace period in 2017. Kansas state Sen. Mike Thompson, a Republican who chairs the committee that handles election legislation, compared the grace period to giving a football team extra chances to score after the game clock expires. "We need this uniform end to the election just so that we know that all voters are operating on the same time frame," he said. A history of complaints in California California has long been a source of complaints about theamount of timeit takes for ballots to be counted and winners declared. "The rest of the country shouldn't have to wait on California to know the results of the elections," U.S. Rep. Bryan Steil, a Wisconsin Republican who chairs the Committee on House Administration, said during an April hearing. He said California's "lax election laws" were to blame for the delays. The nation's most populous state has the largest number of registered voters in the country, some 22.9 million, which is roughly equivalent to the number of voters in Florida and Georgia combined. California also hasembraced universal mail voting, which means every registered voter automatically receives a ballot in the mail for each election. The deadline for election offices to receive completed ballots is seven days after Election Day as long as they are postmarked by then. A survey of some 35,000 Los Angeles County voters during last fall's election found that 40% waited until Election Day to return their ballot. Election officials say the exhaustive process for reviewing and counting mail ballots combined with a large percentage of voters waiting until the last minute makes it impossible for all results to be available on election night. California Democrats consider changes to speed the count Under state law, election officials in California have 30 days to count ballots, conduct a postelection review and certify the results. Dean Logan, Los Angeles County's chief election official, told Congress in May that his team counted nearly 97% of the 3.8 million ballots cast within a week of Election Day in 2024. Jesse Salinas, president of the state clerks' association, said his staff in Yolo County, near Sacramento, already works 16-hour days, seven days a week before and after an election. Assemblyman Marc Berman introduced legislation that would keep the state's 30-day certification period but require county election officials to finish counting most ballots within 13 days after the election. They would be required to notify the state if they weren't going to meet that deadline and give a reason. "I don't think that we can stick our heads in the sand and pretend like these conspiracies aren't out there and that this lack of confidence doesn't exist, in particular among Republican voters in California," said Berman, a Democrat. "There are certain good government things that we can do to strengthen our election system." He acknowledged that many counties already meet the 13-day deadline in his bill, which awaits consideration in the Senate. "My hope is that this will strengthen people's confidence in their election system and their democracy by having some of those benchmarks and just making it very clear for folks when different results will be available," Berman said. ___ Associated Press writer John Hanna in Topeka, Kansas, contributed to this report.

Trump and GOP target ballots arriving after Election Day that delay counts and feed conspiracy fears

Trump and GOP target ballots arriving after Election Day that delay counts and feed conspiracy fears ATLANTA (AP) — PresidentDonald Trumpand...

 

VS POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com