CIA review criticizes procedures but not conclusions of intelligence report on 2016 Russia election interferenceNew Foto - CIA review criticizes procedures but not conclusions of intelligence report on 2016 Russia election interference

WASHINGTON — CIA officials failed in some cases to follow standard procedures inan intelligence analysis of Russian interference effortsin the 2016 election, according to an internal review declassified Wednesday. Intelligence officers were given an unusually short timeline for the analysis, there was "excessive involvement" by senior leaders, and staff members were given uneven access to crucial intelligence about Russia, the "lessons-learned" review said. But the review did not refute the findings of the 2017 intelligence assessment that Russia waged an information warfare campaign designed to undermine Americans' confidence in the electoral process, damage Hillary Clinton and boostDonald Trump's prospects in the 2016 election. "While the overall assessment was deemed defensible, the identified procedural anomalies and tradecraft issues highlight critical lessons for handling controversial or politically charged topics,"the reviewsaid. Follow live politics coverage here Trump and his allies have long rejected intelligence and other reporting indicating that Russia employed false information and propaganda to try to influence the 2016 election and tip the scales in his favor. They have accused intelligence and law enforcement officials of plotting to tie Trump to Russia and cast doubt on the legitimacy of his victory in 2016. A special counsel appointed during the first Trump administration looked extensively into how the CIA crafted its assessment but filed no criminal charges and reported no clear evidence that political bias tainted the process. A bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee investigation in 2020concurred with the 2017 intelligence assessmentand found no reason to dispute its conclusions. In Trump's second presidential term, his deputies have vowed to bring more transparency to the intelligence community and prevent any attempt to politicize its work. CIA Director John Ratcliffe ordered the internal review this year and declassified it Wednesday, according to the CIA. The intelligence assessment of the 2016 vote, which President Barack Obama requested after the November election, found that Russia sought to undermine public faith in the democratic process and denigrate Clinton and that Moscow "aspired" to help Trump win the election. Two senior leaders of a CIA mission center focusing on Russia objected to including the conclusion that Russia aimed to help secure Trump's victory, according to the internal review. They argued that the view was supported mainly by a single intelligence report while other judgments were backed up by more information. The review said the assessment was conducted on an unusually short timeline. Instead of having months to prepare a complex and politically sensitive analysis, the authors had "less than a week to draft the assessment" and "less than two days to formally coordinate it" with other intelligence officers. Multiple intelligence officers "said they felt 'jammed' by the compressed timeline," according to the review. The review said top CIA officials were heavily involved in the assessment effort, which "was highly unusual in both scope and intensity." As a result, the Defense Intelligence Agency and the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research were "entirely shut out" of the analysis, which was a "significant deviation" from standard practice in the intelligence community, according to the review. Authors of the 2016 assessment and other CIA officers also "strongly opposed" including a reference in the analysis to the so-called Trump dossier compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele. The dossier included unverified allegations about Trump's colluding with Russia. In the end, a summary of the dossier was included in an annex, with a disclaimer that it was not used "to reach the analytic conclusions" in the assessment. The review also found reasons to praise the 2016 assessment, saying that much of the team's work showed "robust" tradecraft with extensive sourcing and that there was no sign of systemic problems. ​​John Brennan, who was CIA director at the time of the assessment, told NBC News on Wednesday he was aware of the review but had not had a chance to read it yet.

CIA review criticizes procedures but not conclusions of intelligence report on 2016 Russia election interference

CIA review criticizes procedures but not conclusions of intelligence report on 2016 Russia election interference WASHINGTON — CIA officials ...
DHS and FBI warn about potential lone wolf attacks ahead of July 4 celebrationsNew Foto - DHS and FBI warn about potential lone wolf attacks ahead of July 4 celebrations

Attacks perpetrated by lone actors are the biggest terrorism threat to July 4th festivities in New York City and elsewhere, federal authorities said in a threat assessment obtained by CNN. The FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and other law enforcement agencies issued a joint bulletin in late June saying "the most significant terrorism threat facing the Macy's 4th of July Fireworks stems from lone offenders and small groups of individuals seeking to commit acts of violence." "These individuals are often motivated by a broad range of racial, ethnic, political, religious, anti-government, societal, or personal grievances," the assessment continued. But the threat is not limited to New York City. The bulletin said other large gatherings could be targeted. "Special events with high attendance and media coverage … remain attractive targets" for domestic and foreign terrorists and violent extremists who may want to "cause mass casualties or draw attention to their causes," the bulletin said. The agencies said they had not received any reports of specific threats at the massive fireworks show or related events. However, "high-profile, large events can draw interest from malicious actors looking for targets of opportunity to perpetrate criminal schemes," the bulletin said. It's not uncommon for authorities to issue threat assessments before major events. But several recent, high-profile attacks have spurred additional concern heading into July 4. "We are concerned about the potential threat of copycat attacks inspired by the 2025 New Year's Day vehicle-ramming attack in New Orleans and continued FTO (foreign terrorist organization) messaging calling for attacks against Western targets," the bulletin said. On January 1, a driver intentionally rammed a6,000-pound truck into a crowdof revelers in New Orleans' bustling French Quarter,killing 14 people. The assailant, a Texas-born Army veteran who served in Afghanistan, was killed in a shootout with police. Investigators later discovered he had recorded several videos before the attack that mentionedhis divorce and claimed he had joined ISIS. Just one month before that massacre, the FBI and DHS warned about the threat of violence from lone offenders and thepotential use of vehicle ramming, according to two internal memos obtained by CNN. Tensions over the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza have been linked to a spate of recent violence in the United States, and authorities say similar attacks could erupt on July 4. "Most attackers motivated at least in part by the Israel-HAMAS conflict have selected targets with a symbolic link to Israel, houses of worship, or locations associated with houses of worship. Individuals with grievances linked to the conflict could also perceive large gatherings, such as Independence Day celebrations, as opportunistic targets symbolic of the West in general," the threat assessment said. The DHS and FBI cited last month's firebomb attack in Boulder, Colorado, that targeted a group of demonstrators supporting Israelis who were held hostage by Hamas. Dozens of people were injured, andan 82-year-old woman died. The attack marked "the most recent act of terrorist violence in the Homeland motivated by the Israel-HAMAS conflict," the joint bulletin said. "This attack came shortly after the (May 21) attackkilling two Israeli embassy staffin Washington, DC." Drones have also raised the specter of possible violence at large holiday events, the threat assessment said. "Unauthorized unmanned aircraft system (UAS) activities may pose a hazard to participants and attendees, delay events, and disrupt law enforcement operations," the FBI and DHS said. "Although we have no credible, specific reporting regarding illicit plans to use UAS to target the Macy's 4th of July Fireworks, we assess that unauthorized UAS operations have the potential to increase public safety risks." While most drones are flown legally by hobbyists, they "have also been used to facilitate terrorist and other criminal acts," the threat assessment said. "Various state and nonstate actors have increased their use and modification of short-range UAS to conduct surveillance of adversary positions, drop small munitions on targets, and detonate explosive-laden UAS on impact to targets in conflict zones abroad," the bulletin said. "Malicious use of UAS poses a potential risk to spectators, volunteers, security personnel, and first responders in and around the event." For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

DHS and FBI warn about potential lone wolf attacks ahead of July 4 celebrations

DHS and FBI warn about potential lone wolf attacks ahead of July 4 celebrations Attacks perpetrated by lone actors are the biggest terrorism...
President Trump announces trade deal with Vietnam as major tariff deadline loomsNew Foto - President Trump announces trade deal with Vietnam as major tariff deadline looms

WASHINGTON ―President Donald Trumpsaid he's secured a trade deal with Vietnam in what would be just the second agreement Trump has made with another country ahead ofa critical July 9 deadlinewhen U.S. tariffs could skyrocket. Full details of the deal were not immediately clear, though Trump said the U.S. will levy 20% tariffs on imports from communist-controlled Vietnam and a 40% tariff on any transshipping of goods. "In return, Vietnam will do something that they have never done before, give the United States of America TOTAL ACCESS to their Markets for Trade," Trump said in a July 2 post on Truth Social announcing the deal. "In other words, they will 'OPEN THEIR MARKET TO THE UNITED STATES,' meaning that, we will be able to sell our product into Vietnam at ZERO Tariff," the president added. More:Trump's tariffs are 'not going away' amid legal battles, White House says Trump announced the deal after speaking with To Lam, general secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam. Vietnamese state media said the U.S. and Vietnam reached an agreement on a joint statement for a "reciprocal, fair and balanced" trade deal. During Trump's phone call with Lam, the Vietnamese leader asked the U.S. to recognize Vietnam as a market economy and remove restrictions on the exports of hi-tech products to Vietnam, Vietnam News Agency reported. More:Trump says U.S. will end trade talks with Canada, could move deadline for other tariffs Companies are currently paying a 10% universal U.S. tariff that Trump imposed on imports from Vietnam and some 180 other nations. However,significantly larger reciprocal tariffsthat Trump initially imposed in early April ‒but soon after paused for 90 daysamid market turbulence ‒ are set to go back into effect July 9. Trump could choose to extend the pause, but he's said he's not interested in that. "No, I'm not," Trump told reporters July 1 when asked whether he plans to lengthen the pause. "I'm not thinking about the pause. I'll be writing letters to a lot of countries. And I think you're just starting to understand the process." When the Trump administration delayedthe sweeping reciprocal tariffsto allow negotiations with other nations to continue, the White House economic team predicted deals would come at breakneck speed. "We're going to run 90 deals in 90 days. It's possible," White House trade adviser Peter Navarrosaid at the time. But the administration has struggled to make progress on that pledge. Trump and United Kingdom Prime Minister Keri Starmer in May reached the first trade deal since Trump imposed the new tariffs ‒ but no others have followed. More:Trump says trade deal with China is 'done;' aides tout 'framework' deal In June, Trump announced the frameworkof a trade deal with China in which the U.S. would collect 55% tariffs on Chinese imports and China would collect 10% on U.S. imports.A month earlier, Trump and China agreed to slash triple-digit tariffs imposed on the other as the two parties continued talks. The Trump administration had previously pointed to Japan as another opportunity to secure a trade deal. But Trump on Tuesday said a U.S.-Japan deal is unlikely. "I doubt it with Japan ‒ they're very tough. You have to understand, they're spoiled," Trump told reporters. Contributing: Reuters Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump reaches trade deal with Vietnam as big tariff deadline looms

President Trump announces trade deal with Vietnam as major tariff deadline looms

President Trump announces trade deal with Vietnam as major tariff deadline looms WASHINGTON ―President Donald Trumpsaid he's secured a t...
Fox News, MAGA hats and cookies: Inside Trump's West WingNew Foto - Fox News, MAGA hats and cookies: Inside Trump's West Wing

WASHINGTON — The military leaders who came to the Oval Office to discuss the newF-47 stealth fighter jethad a few surprises in store. At one point in their sit-down with President Donald Trump, Mark Zuckerberg, the Meta chief executive, walked in unexpectedly. Worried that he didn't have security clearance, officials asked the social media magnate to wait outside, two people familiar with the meeting said. A young aide also came in during the meeting, showed the president something on her laptop computer and left. Trump's cellphone rang a couple of times. Expecting more privacy in the meeting with the commander in chief, some of the officials came away mystified and a bit unnerved. They quietly discussed among themselves whether the visitors and calls might have compromised sensitive information, with one asking whether they should be concerned about "spillage." Trump affectionately refers to the Oval Office as "Grand Central Terminal" because of all the comings and goings, a senior White House official said. One of the people familiar with the winter meeting about the plane used another term: "bizarro world." Various aides have tried over the years to impose a certain discipline in the Trump White House, with limited results. Trump likes to see whom he wants and call whom he chooses, and in the new term, he presides over a freewheeling West Wing that mirrors the man, current and former aides say. Trump will interrupt an Oval Office meeting and spontaneously pick up the phone and call a friend or confidant, a senior administration official said. Cabinet secretaries often mill around the building, popping in and out of offices with powerful advisers, including chief of staff Susie Wiles and deputy chief Stephen Miller. "No one wants to miss the decision," a person who has been to the White House for meetings said. One meeting rolls into another. Cabinet members who'd planned 30-minute visits to the White House may end up staying for hours at the president's invitation. "If you're in a meeting about [disaster] preparedness and the next meeting is about whatever, he'll say, 'Stick around,'" the senior administration official said. If Trump's methods are unorthodox, his supporters say, he is delivering results. He is on the cusp ofpassing a billthat would accomplish many of his domestic goals: cutting taxes and clamping down on illegal immigration. And he orchestrated a ceasefire between Iran and Israel that is holding for now, averting further escalation. Yet Trump's managerial style also poses risks, current and former officials say. Cabinet secretaries run complex agencies that need attention and leadership. Decamping to the West Wing can deprive the federal workforce of both. A staff's careful effort to provide balanced viewpoints before the president sets policy can blow up if he's also hearing from friends and associates sharing unvetted information. And, unlike Grand Central Station, the White House is a zone where secrets need to be protected. NBC News spoke to more than a dozen past and current administration officials, lawmakers and Trump allies about the West Wing's rhythms. What's noteworthy is the informality, they said. One former national security official said they were struck by how often they'd run into Vice President JD Vance standing outside the Oval Office near the Keurig coffee maker, drinking a cup or eating one of the cookies on offer. Vance's office declined to comment. A Republican senator invited over for a bill signing said Trump took him and others to see what the president called "the Monica Lewinsky Room," scene of the trysts between Bill Clinton and a certain White House intern. There, in the space near the Oval Office, Trump keeps a supply of MAGA hats and shirts to give out to visitors. The senior White House official described the room as a "beautifully organized" gift shop of sorts. "He does what he wants, and they [Trump aides] let him do it," the senator said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Some visitors to the White House say they've been struck by the ubiquity of Trump Cabinet secretaries. At least in the early phase of Trump's last term, Cabinet members tended to stick to their home agencies, a former White House official said. "They should be running their bureaucracies. They shouldn't be hanging around the White House," the person said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Now, Cabinet members are a routine presence in the West Wing. Trump likes it that way, the senior White House official said. Trump is the ultimate decision-maker, and that's why they come, the person said, adding, "He wants them here, too." Secretary of State Marco Rubio has an office in the West Wing now that Trump has given him the dual role of national security adviser — the first person to simultaneously hold both jobs since Henry Kissinger did so in the Nixon administration. Scott Bessent, the treasury secretary, works out of the building next door and, with a broad portfolio that encompasses the economy and tariffs, is a regular visitor. So is Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, a key player in Trump's tariff negotiations with other countries. Indeed, some aides past and present describe Lutnick as a perennial guest: quick to arrive, not as quick to leave. Lutnick's headquarters is less than a mile from the White House, but he "could be stationed in Maryland, and he would still be at the White House," a second senior White House official said, who added that Lutnick spends his time there going in and out of meetings with Trump. The official said that was due in part to Lutnick's oversight of trade and tariff issues at the center of the president's agenda. The Commerce Department didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Meta declined to comment. Face time with the president can be a way for Cabinet members to retain influence, something that may not be lost on the people who serve at Trump's pleasure.Turnover in Trump's first termwas high; this time, his Cabinet has stayed largely intact. "If you're a Cabinet member, there's a fine line between too much time and not enough time" in Trump's company, the senior administration official said. "Sometimes in Trump world, scarcity is a good thing. But too much scarcity and you get forgotten." In a prepared statement, the White House deputy chief of staff for communications, Taylor Budowich, said: "President Trump has assembled the greatest cabinet in American history—a group of talented individuals who embody the diverse coalition that delivered his historic election victory. [Wiles] has played an integral role in operationalizing his agenda through his administration and has ensured everyone is empowered with the tools to deliver on the president's mandate." One habit that is carryover from Trump's first term is his fondness for the cellphone. Trump will pause a meeting to call old friends like Dana White, chief executive of Ultimate Fighting Championship, or Rupert Murdoch, the chairman emeritus of Fox, the senior administration official said. "He'll say: 'Let's call Rupert. Fox is killing me today,'" the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to talk freely. Lately, Trump has phoned Murdoch for his views on the conflict between Israel and Iran and, in particular, Washington's involvement, according to two people with knowledge of the calls. Overseeing the West Wing operation is Wiles, the fifth chief of staff Trump has had in his 4½ years in office. Trump affectionately calls her the "Ice Maiden." Few of the chiefs have succeeded in controlling access to Trump or policing his calls to outside friends and advisers who might want to sway his thinking on an issue. But Wiles is credited with at least balancing Trump's improvisational instincts with a semblance of order. "She's in virtually every meeting that matters," said former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Trump ally, who describes her as the best chief of staff Trump has had. "She sits there and takes notes and knows what the president wants to accomplish and does it." A White House official said Wiles, a former lobbyist, holds the view that while she may not know the answers, she'll see to it that Trump hears all sides of an issue before he makes a decision. Trump's longest-serving chief of staff, John Kelly, tried something similar in the first term. Kelly's practice was to see to it that if someone came into the Oval Office to pitch an idea to Trump, a person representing an opposing view would also be on hand so the president heard both viewpoints. Kelly was gone after about a year and a half, his effort to bring more structure to the West Wing having fizzled. "I don't think the president's habits have changed much," the Republican senator said. "He watches a lot of TV, and he lives on the telephone. He likes to be called. In fact, last time I was with him, he said, 'Why don't you call me anymore?' and I'm thinking, 'Because I don't have anything to say and, No. 2, because you're the president and you're busy.'"

Fox News, MAGA hats and cookies: Inside Trump's West Wing

Fox News, MAGA hats and cookies: Inside Trump's West Wing WASHINGTON — The military leaders who came to the Oval Office to discuss the n...
Is Trump really close to securing an Israel-Hamas ceasefire for Gaza?New Foto - Is Trump really close to securing an Israel-Hamas ceasefire for Gaza?

It appeared on Wednesday that President Trump likely still has some deal-making to do before he can claim to have brokered a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas to end the devastatingwar in Gaza. Mr.Trump saidin a Tuesday evening social media post that Israel had "agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize" a 60-day ceasefire, and he called on Hamas to accept the deal, warning the U.S.- and Israeli-designated terrorist group that "it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE." Israeli sources told CBS News on Wednesday that while there was strong backing in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's cabinet for the terms in the proposal, Israel was not committing to it yet, stressing that the government had voiced its backing to U.S. officials for a proposed framework for a ceasefire deal, not a final agreement. In a statement, Hamas credited mediators Qatar and Egypt for having "exerted intensive efforts to bridge the gap between the parties and reach a framework agreement that would pave the way for a serious round of negotiations." "We are approaching this with a high sense of responsibility and are conducting national consultations to discuss the proposals presented by the mediators," Hamas said, reiterating its long-standing calls for a truce that brings the war to an end, sees Israeli forces withdraw from Gaza, "and urgently delivers relief to our people in the Gaza Strip." Mr. Trump didn't offer any details of the proposed deal in his post on Tuesday evening, but he said that Qatar and Egypt — which have been key partners to the U.S. as it attempts to broker an agreement to end the nearly two-year war — would "deliver this final proposal." Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar, in apost on social mediaWednesday, said there was "a great majority in the government and also among the people for a framework to release hostages. If there is an opportunity to do so — we must not miss it!" But that claim of cohesion may belie a potentially significant hurdle for Netanyahu as he prepares to head to Washington this weekend to meet with Mr.Trump, who's made it clear he wants to see a dealto end the war within days. Numerous Israeli media outlets reported Wednesday that one of the most far-right members of Netanyahu's cabinet, Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, had called on far-right nationalist Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich to join him in blocking the government's approval of the ceasefire deal. Neither Smotrich nor Ben-Gvir confirmed any discussion about blocking the agreement, but in a short post on social media, Ben-Gvir said the war in Gaza should not end "a moment before defeating Hamas." Both men have been vocal in rejecting peace deals with Hamas, insisting that the group must be completely destroyed, not negotiated with. Yair Golan, leader of the Israeli opposition Democrats party, accused Smotrich and Ben-Gvir in a social media post of "leading a bloc to prevent the return of the hostages." He said they "do not deserve to sit around the government table. And whoever continues to allow them to sit there does not deserve to lead Israel for even one more day." While the real prospects of Israel and Hamas agreeing to a ceasefire in the short time frame that Mr. Trump is hoping for remained unclear, even the suggestion that peace could be looming may raise hopes for Gazans who risk their lives every day just to line up lining up for food. Gaza Humanitarian Foundation responds to criticism The Hamas-run Gaza Ministry of Health says at least 640 civilians have been shot to death in recent weeks trying to access desperately needed humanitarian supplies, including more than 400 at distribution sites run by the heavily criticized U.S.- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Since it began operating in the war-torn enclave on May 26, GHF has faced near daily claims of aid-seekers being killed by Israeli forces as they try to reach its four hubs in Gaza. Earlier this week, more than 170 humanitarian groups called for the opaquely run organization — which has never revealed its funding or management structure — to be disbanded and all aid efforts in Gaza to be reorganized under the long-established United Nations-led system. Those international humanitarian efforts have been largely blocked by Israel since March. The Israeli military says it works with the GHF to enable aid distribution without the risk of food and other goods being stolen by Hamas. The Trump administration has backed that reasoning and refused to support other means of food dispersal in Gaza, instead calling on other nations and institutions to work with the GHF, which replaced some 400 international aid distribution points in the Palestinian territory with just four of its hubs. Those hubs are run by armed U.S. private security contractors, and the Israeli military controls access to them. All established humanitarian agencies have refused to work with the GHF, saying it forces Palestinians to dislocate and trek for miles to reach its hubs and that it violates basic humanitarian principles, but the Trump administration announced late last week its first public support for the group: $30 million in funding. The State Department wouldn't say, when that funding was announced, if the funds had already been transferred to GHF, or which U.S. government account they would come from. The GHF has declined to respond to multiple questions from CBS News about its connections with the U.S. and Israeli governments and its funding, and it had, until this week, also declined to be interviewed by CBS News about its operations. On Tuesday, however, the GHF's director, American evangelical reverend Johnnie Moore, a former adviser to President Trump on religious matters, agreed to an interview via Zoom. Our first question was about the reports CBS News has received since GHF began its operations, directly from doctors and eyewitnesses, that Israeli soldiers have repeatedly opened fire on unarmed civilians trying to reach its aid hubs. "I do not want to diminish these reports, but we can't control what happens outside our distribution sites," Moore told CBS News. Asked how many more people would die before GHF changed the way it operates, Moore called the framing of the question "inappropriate," and said the group's "whole reason for existing is to give food to these people so they can live." He repeated his previous calls — and those of the White House — for the United Nations and its various humanitarian agencies to join GHF's efforts in Gaza. "We've said again and again to the U.N., to the WFP (World Food Program), join us in this effort," Moore said, before asking CBS News' correspondent, "with respect, why don't you join us? I'm asking you to help us run the operation if you think there is a better way to do this." Asked how GHF has been able to verify who exactly receives the aid it provides on the ground — which Moore has stressed does not reach Hamas — the reverend responded with a question: "Do you have anything positive to say about what we are doing?" "Do you think it is acceptable that people die every day trying to access aid? Is there not a better way to do this?" CBS News asked again. "We have made a decision that it is worth working in a war zone," Moore said, "as deadly as it is, because Gazans deserve food." Moore would not respond to questions about how GHF operates or who funds the organization, beside the $30 million contribution announced this week by the Trump administration. Details from inside the courtroom as Sean "Diddy" Combs jury announced verdict Split verdict in Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering trial | Special Report House Republicans scramble to meet Trump's Fourth of July deadline on budget bill

Is Trump really close to securing an Israel-Hamas ceasefire for Gaza?

Is Trump really close to securing an Israel-Hamas ceasefire for Gaza? It appeared on Wednesday that President Trump likely still has some de...

 

VS POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com