US, Indo-Pacific partners agree to strengthen maritime, critical minerals cooperationNew Foto - US, Indo-Pacific partners agree to strengthen maritime, critical minerals cooperation

WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States. Australia, India and Japan have agreed to expand their cooperation on maritime security in the Indo-Pacific and further collaborate on supplies of critical minerals and rare earths that are key components of high-tech production. The foreign ministers of the four countries,known as the "Quad,"met in Washington on Tuesday as the Trump administration seeks to expand U.S. influence in the Indo-Pacific to compete with a rising China amid tensions with partners over trade and defense issues. In a joint meeting with his three colleagues, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the Quad must be a "vehicle for action" that goes beyond statements of intent and stressed that commerce and trade will be critical to ensuring the group's relevance in the future. To that end, the four announced in a statement the creation of a "Quad Critical Minerals Initiative" that aims "to strengthen economic security and collective resilience by collaborating on securing and diversifying critical mineral supply chains." The statement did not provide details of the initiative. "We are deeply concerned about the abrupt constriction and future reliability of key supply chains, specifically for critical minerals," they said. "This includes the use of non-market policies and practices for critical minerals, certain derivative products, and mineral processing technology." The statement did not mention China by name, but Chinese domination of the critical minerals supply chain has long been a concern of the U.S. and others. The ministers expressed specific concern about rising tensions in the East and South China Seas, where Beijing has become increasingly assertive of maritime and territorial claims that are rejected by its smaller neighbors. "We reiterate our strong opposition to any unilateral actions that seek to change the status quo by force or coercion," they said. "We express our serious concerns regarding dangerous and provocative actions, including interference with offshore resource development, the repeated obstruction of the freedoms of navigation and overflight, and the dangerous maneuvers by military aircraft and coast guard and maritime militia vessels, especially the unsafe use of water cannons and ramming or blocking actions in the South China Sea." The ministers also condemned North Korea for continuing to launch ballistic missiles, expand its nuclear weapons program and engage in malicious cyberactivity. In a veiled reference to North Korean support for Russia in its war against Ukraine, they expressed "deep concern about countries that are deepening military cooperation with North Korea, which directly undermines the global nonproliferation regime."

US, Indo-Pacific partners agree to strengthen maritime, critical minerals cooperation

US, Indo-Pacific partners agree to strengthen maritime, critical minerals cooperation WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States. Australia, India ...
Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOPNew Foto - Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOP

Sen. Thom Tillis was fed up, and took to the Senate floor to unload on PresidentDonald Trump's megabill. As the bill cleared a key hurdle, Tillis issued a warning. He attributed his rise to U.S. senator from North Carolina to blowback against former President Barack Obama's 2010 health care law,the Affordable Care Act, which fueled crushing Democratic losses across the country. Republicans won control of the U.S. House, stopping Obama's legislative agenda in its tracks. The GOP is now rushing into similarly perilous territory, Tillis implied, by cutting more than $1 trillionfrom Medicaid. "Republicans are about to make a mistake on health care andbetraying a promise," he said. More:Medicaid 'churn': How working Americans could lose coverage under Trump tax bill The speech capped a consequential 24 hours for Tillis. He came out against Trump's legislation because of deep cuts to the federal health insurance program for low-income Americans, prompting the president tothreaten a primary challenge. Tillis thenannounced he wouldn't seek reelection in 2026. Tillis' experience sums up theexplosive politicssurrounding a nearly 1,000-page bill that has deeply divided the GOP. Many Republicans are touting it as a landmark achievement, but others are worried the unpopular measure hurts vulnerable people, goes against the party's working-class outreach, balloons the deficit and could cost Republicans dearly in the next election. Elon Musk, the multibillionaire former Trump adviser, is threatening to primary GOP lawmakers and even start a new political party over his deficit concerns. Looming over the debate is a president who threatens retribution against those who oppose him, and is pushing to have the legislationon his desk by July 4. Term-limited and free from facing voters again, Trump is looking for a legacy achievement. His supporters predict the bill will prove out over time. Sen.Jim Justice, R-West Virginia, compared the controversy to someone sticking their hand in a bucket of water and jerking it out. More:Thom Tillis, key Republican holdout on Trump's tax bill, won't seek reelection "The water's turbulent for a little while but then it'll just settle right out," he told USA TODAY. "That's what I think will happen." The bill narrowly cleared the Senate by a 51-50 vote on July 1 - three Republicans and every Democrat opposed it ,and Vice PresidentJD Vancehad to break the tie in a dramatic flourish - after a different version earlier passed the House. It now heads back to the House for final approval, where lawmakers have expressed concerns that the spending cuts either go too far, or not far enough. Trump said July 1 it would be "wise" for Republicans to get on board. "It's a great bill," Trump said, adding: "Great for the border, great for low taxes, and I would say that they have to do it." Despite some of the GOP resistance, bucking the president is politically perilous – as Tillis experienced − and Trump appears poised for a major legislative victory. The billwould enact key campaign promisesinto law – including cutting taxes on tipped wages and overtime pay and greatly expanded deportation efforts, which would receive a massive funding increase. It also makes permanent the sweeping tax reductions Trump passed in 2017, cementing his record as a big tax cutter. Trump launched his second term with an aggressive policy agenda, but hasrelied on executive ordersthat can easily be undone if Democrats reclaim the White House. His megabill – dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act - is a more lasting achievement, one that will help define his legacy. Yet like other major policy proposals from past presidents, the politics of the legislation have been difficult to navigate. Obama's health care bill divided Democrats, with 34 voting against it in the House. To help offset lost tax revenue, Trump's bill makes big cuts,most notably to Medicaid. That has some Republicans nervous. Any political victory from the bill could be short lived if it results in major blowback in the 2026 midterms. The legislation could complicate the GOP's pitch to blue collar voters. "This is a debate over the soul of the Republican Party," said Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri. "Are we going to be a working class party or not?" More:Religious leaders protest GOP tax, Medicaid bill: 'It hurts working people' Democrats are eager to run against the bill, casting it as a largely benefiting the wealthy while hurting the poor. "The different ways in which this bill bites working families over and over is going to make it a problem for Republicans in the House and the Senate all the way through November of 2026 and beyond," Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, told USA TODAY. An analysis of the House bill released last month by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the poorest households would lose about $1,600 a year under the legislation, largely because of cuts to Medicaid and food aid. The wealthiest households would gain about $12,000 a year,according to the CBO. The Senate bill has more aggressive cuts than the House. The CBO estimatesthat nearly 12 million people would lose Medicaid under the Senate bill, with the program facing roughly $1 trillion in cuts. More than250 people protestedthe deep cuts across from the Capitol at the steps of the Supreme Court on June 30, surrounded by dozens of caskets covered with statistics of how many people would lose Medicaid and food assistance in each state. The crowd chanted "you will not kill us and our people without a fight." Warren said criticism of the bill is resonating not just in blue states, but also red states, pointing to polling showing it's broadly unpopular. She recently drew 1,500 people to atown hall in Tennesseeblasting the legislation. "When people know anything about the Republican tax bill they hate it," she told USA TODAY. Republican lawmakers have largely rallied around Trump, accusing Democrats of misrepresenting the legislation. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said individual elements of the bill poll well but conceded the GOP has some "work to do" to sell the legislation. Trump ran a populist campaign that targeted blue collar voters with proposals such as tax cuts on tips and overtime, and Republicans have pointed to those provisions in the bill to counter criticism that it benefits the wealthy. But some Republican lawmakers worry cutting Medicaid could undermine GOP inroads to the working class. "You cannot be a working-class party if you are taking away healthcare for working class people," Hawley said over the weekend. Yet Hawley still supported the legislation, a sign of how intense the pressure is to deliver for Trump, who also is facing resistance from fiscal conservatives over projections the bill will increase the federal budget deficit by $3.3 trillion. Deficit hawks in the Senate ultimately caved and voted for the bill, and now attention turns to the House, where critics of the legislation's fiscal impact are being egged on by billionaire Elon Musk. "It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!"Musk wrote in a June 30 post on X. "Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people." Muskthreated primary challengesagainst GOP lawmakers who support the bill. Trump, meanwhile, is urging his party to fall in line and lashing out at dissenters such as Tillis and Rep. Thomas Massie, who voted against the legislation in the House. In the process, some lawmakers are bowing out. In addition to Tillis,Rep. Don Bacon, a moderate Nebraska Republican who has criticized Trump's megabill, announced he won't seek reelection. Losing lawmakers with bipartisan appeal could make it harder for the GOP to maintain their majorities. The North Carolina Senate race already was a toss up before Tillis resigned, noted University of Virginia political science professor Larry Sabato. It's even more competitive now, he said in a social media post. "Dems should send Trump a fruit basket of thanks,"Sabato said. Contributing: Sarah Wire This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump's big bill is a win. But it could also be a big problem for GOP

Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOP

Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOP Sen. Thom Tillis was fed up, and took to the Senate floor to unloa...
Trump says daughter-in-law Lara 'first choice' for North Carolina Senate seatNew Foto - Trump says daughter-in-law Lara 'first choice' for North Carolina Senate seat

President Donald Trumpsaid his daughter-in-law Lara Trump is his "first choice" to be the GOP nominee for the North Carolina U.S. Senate seat beingvacated by Sen. Thom Tillis, while also noting she doesn't live in the state. "She's a great person, Lara Trump," Trump told reporters July 1. "I mean, that would always be my first choice but she doesn't live there now, but she's there all the time... she really knows North Carolina well." Tillis announced over the weekend that he's not seeking reelection in 2026, creating an open seat in a key swing state.Tillis opposed Trump's signature legislation, criticizing Medicaid cuts in the bill, and Trumpthreatened to find a primary challengerbefore the senator announced he's not running again. Lara Trump, the wife of Trump's son Eric, previously had been discussed as a potential replacement for former Florida Sen.Marco Rubiowhen the president picked him to be secretary of state.Lara Trump said "would seriously consider"taking Rubio's seat but laterwithdrew her name from consideration. Lara Trump wasborn in Wilmington, North Carolina, raised in Wrightsville Beach and attended college in the state. She now lives in Florida. She co-chaired the Republican National Committee during the 2024 election and hosts a Fox News show. "Somebody that would really be great is Lara, she grew up there," Trump said of the race, before noting "they live in Florida, they have a very good life." Trump said he doesn't know who will run for the seat. He expects one of the congressmen from the state to "step up." Contributing: Iris Seaton This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Donald Trump promotes Lara Trump for North Carolina Senate seat

Trump says daughter-in-law Lara 'first choice' for North Carolina Senate seat

Trump says daughter-in-law Lara 'first choice' for North Carolina Senate seat President Donald Trumpsaid his daughter-in-law Lara Tr...
Senate Republicans narrowly pass Trump megabill after marathon voting sessionNew Foto - Senate Republicans narrowly pass Trump megabill after marathon voting session

WASHINGTON — The Republican-controlled Senate narrowly passed President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy package Tuesday, bringing it one step closer to his desk. The vote was 51-50, with Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie after three Republicans joined all Democrats in opposing the legislation. In a marathon overnight session that spanned more than 24 hours, senators voted on dozens of proposed changes to the legislation and GOP leaders dragged out many of the votes as they frantically worked to win over holdouts. They ultimately secured enough votes with a catch-all amendment that was similarly approved by a vote of 51-50. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who had expressed concerns throughout the process about the bill's cuts to social safety net programs, was a key vote for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., to win over. "I struggled mightily with the impact on the most vulnerable in this country, when you look to Medicaid and SNAP," Murkowski told reporters after the vote, adding that she didn't get "everything" she wanted but that "I had to look on balance." Voting against the final bill, alongside all 47 Democrats, were Republican Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Susan Collins of Maine. Paul opposed the bill because it would add trillions of dollars to the deficit, while Tillis and Collins feared the cuts to Medicaid were too steep. "My difficulties with the bill go far beyond what they could resolve," Collins said after she cast her no vote. Tuesday's vote puts Trump on the cusp of a major legislative victory and hands Thune thebiggest winof his first six months on the job. Dubbed the "big, beautiful bill" by Trump, the revised legislation now heads back to the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., will be forced to scramble to pass it before Trump's July 4 deadline. "The House will work quickly to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill that enacts President Trump's full America First agenda by the Fourth of July," Johnson and his leadership team said in a joint statement Tuesday. "The American people gave us a clear mandate, and after four years of Democrat failure, we intend to deliver without delay." In a statement after the vote, Murkowski detailed the concessions for Alaska that she secured from leadership, which Paul ridiculed as "pork and subsidies" for her state. Murkowski said she won tribal exemptions for new work requirements for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients. She also helped secure a carveout for Alaska and a handful of other states that have high error rates in providing SNAP benefits, temporarily exempting them from SNAP cuts spelled out in the bill. But even though she voted for the bill, Murkowski called it an "awful process" and said she hopes the House makes changes to the Senate package. "We do not have a perfect bill by any stretch of the imagination," Murkowski said. "My hope is that House is going to look at this and recognize that we're not there yet." Thune and his team made several eleventh-hour changes to appease holdouts like Murkowski and get the package over the finish line. A special fund for rural hospitals, which faced cuts in the bill, was boosted to $50 billion, up from $25 billion. A provision to ban solar leasing for clean energy tax credits was stripped out, as was anexcise taxon wind and solar projects. Conservatives' aggressive push to slash federal funding for Medicaid expansion states ultimately did not make it in the final bill. The bill includes an extension of Trump's 2017 tax cuts and provisions to temporarily eliminate taxes on tips and overtime pay. It includes a surge of new funding for the military and Trump's immigration enforcement and mass deportation plans. It aims to pay for some of that with hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts to Medicaid, SNAP and clean energy funding. And it would raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. To pass their bill, Republicans voted along party lines to set an aggressive new precedent that will have a lasting impact on the Senate. They used a trick known as "current policy baseline"to obscure the cost of extending 2017 tax cuts, essentially lowering the sticker price by $3.8 trillion. That tactic, backed by all 53 Republicans, hasn't been used in the filibuster-proof process before, and it weakens the Senate's 60-vote threshold. "This is the nuclear option," said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., warning that it will "cut both ways" when the majority flips. Before the final revisions, the Senate bill had been projected to increase the national debt by $3.3 trillion over a decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which said it would reduce revenues by $4.5 trillion and cut spending by $1.2 trillion. In addition, 11.8 million people are projected to lose their health insurance by 2034 if it becomes law, the CBO said. The Senate's "vote-a-rama" session, in which members can offer an unlimited number of amendments to the legislation they are debating, dragged through the night into Tuesday morning. In total, senators cast votes on more than 45 amendments — a record. One of the more notable was a lopsided 99-1 vote to kill a provision — written by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, the chair of the Commerce Committee — to establish a 10-year moratorium on state and local artificial intelligence regulations. GOP governors objected to the proposal, and Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., backed out of a compromise deal with Cruz on a five-year temporary ban on the regulations. Democrats, meanwhile, used the vote-a-rama to force a bevy of messaging votes to highlight how Republicans were protecting the superwealthy. They introduced four motions to let the 2017 tax cuts expire for people making $10 million, $100 million, $500 million and $1 billion a year, each of which failed by voice vote. "Americans will pay the price of this perfidy for generations," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., told reporters after Tuesday's vote. "Republicans are taking away your health care to give a tax break to billionaires." Senators struggled to keep themselves occupied during the all-night session. Republicans noshed on pizza in their cloakroom just off the floor. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, read a book on his Kindle. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, did a Trump impression to GOP colleagues as he discussed Elon Musk'ssocial media postsbashing the bill. In the frigid chamber, Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., wrapped herself in a blanket embroidered with the words "Wild Wonderful West Virginia." And Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., recordedsocial media videosaround the Capitol of things youwon't seeon a normal tour. The legislation faces hurdles in the House, where Republicans can similarly spare only three votes. An earlier versionpassed by one vote, and the Senate changes have drawn criticism from some GOP lawmakers. They include the hard-right House Freedom Caucus, which is rebelling against the lack of spending cuts to pay for the bill. Rep. Nick LaLota, R-N.Y., came out against the scaled-back state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap in the bill, which would increase the limit to $40,000 for five years, then cut it back to $10,000. And Rep. David Valadao, R-Calif., who represents a swing district, slammed the Senate bill's more aggressive Medicaid funding cuts. "I've been clear from the start that I will not support a final reconciliation bill that makes harmful cuts to Medicaid, puts critical funding at risk, or threatens the stability of healthcare providers across CA-22," Valadaowrote on Xover the weekend. In aTruth Social post, Trump urged the House GOP to "ignores its occasional 'GRANDSTANDERS' (You know who you are!)" and pass the bill. "To my GOP friends in the House: Stay UNITED, have fun, and Vote "YAY." GOD BLESS YOU ALL!" he wrote.

Senate Republicans narrowly pass Trump megabill after marathon voting session

Senate Republicans narrowly pass Trump megabill after marathon voting session WASHINGTON — The Republican-controlled Senate narrowly passed ...
Trump says he won't extend July 9 trade deadline, expresses doubt on Japan dealNew Foto - Trump says he won't extend July 9 trade deadline, expresses doubt on Japan deal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he was not thinking of extending the July 9 deadline for countries to negotiate trade deals with the U.S., and continued to express doubt that an agreement could be reached with Japan. "We've dealt with Japan. I'm not sure we're going to make a deal. I doubt it," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned to Washington from a trip to Florida. Trump suggested he could impose a tariff of "30% or 35% or whatever the number is that we determine" on imports from Japan - well above the 24% tariff rate he announced on April 2 and then later paused. (Reporting by Andrea Shalal)

Trump says he won't extend July 9 trade deadline, expresses doubt on Japan deal

Trump says he won't extend July 9 trade deadline, expresses doubt on Japan deal WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump said on Tue...

 

VS POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com