Germany's Merz to face Trump in Oval Office on inaugural tripNew Foto - Germany's Merz to face Trump in Oval Office on inaugural trip

By Sarah Marsh, Andrea Shalal and Andreas Rinke BERLIN/WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Germany's new chancellor, Friedrich Merz, will hold his first face-to-face talks with U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday in a high stakes meeting in the Oval Office as Europe seeks to stave off looming U.S. tariffs and sustain U.S. backing for Ukraine. The 69-year-old conservative, who took the helm of Europe's largest economy last month, is scheduled to join Trump for lunch and one-on-one talks that analysts say could set the tone for U.S.-German ties for years to come. Germany's export-oriented economy stands more to lose from U.S. tariffs than others and the country is also the second largest military and financial backer of Ukraine in its defence against Russia's invasion, after the United States. The meeting comes amid a broader fraying of the transatlantic relationship. Trump's administration has, for example, intervened in domestic European politics in a break with past practise, aligning with right-wing political movements and challenging European policies on immigration and free speech. The encounter will be closely watched after some recent meetings in the Oval Office, with the leaders of Ukraine and South Africa, for example, turned tense when Trump ambushed them with false claims and accusations. Merz and his entourage have sought coaching from other leaders on how to deal with Trump to avoid conflict. The meeting comes just weeks before a critical summit of the NATO Western military alliance which is looking increasingly strained given Trump's threats not to come to the aid of U.S. allies that do not up their spending on defence. Such threats are of particular concern to Germany, which has relied on U.S. nuclear deterrence for its security since the end of World War Two. Merz has already made some bold policy moves that he can highlight to appease Trump, analysts said. He has backed Trump's demand to more than double NATO's spending target to 5% of economic output, earning unprecedented praise last weekend from U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. Merz, who has vowed a more assertive foreign policy, also coordinated a visit by European leaders to Kyiv just days after taking office, two European diplomat sources said. "This shows that Germany is willing to accept a greater responsibility for Ukraine and the European security order – these are all things that have been wished for in the United States over years and will be welcomed," said Sudha David-Wilp of the German Marshall Fund of the United States. "Germany is well-positioned to show that it can help the United States achieve its foreign policy goals." The fact Merz was invited to stay in the Blair House guest quarters across from the White House is a positive signal, said analysts. KINDRED SPIRIT OR FOE? Merz and Trump could even find some common ground given their business backgrounds, their membership in right-of-centre political parties, their focus on fighting illegal immigration and their fondness for golf, said Steven Sokol, President and CEO of the American Council on Germany. They also both had run-ins with former German chancellor Angela Merkel - who once squeezed Merz out of top-level politics. Moreover Merz has described himself as "a convinced transatlanticist", chairing the "Atlantic Bridge", a non-profit fostering U.S.-German ties, for 10 years. "They might discover a kindred spirit," Sokol said. Still, Trump was unpredictable, while Merz was impulsive, warned analysts, and there were huge frictions in the relationship. "The challenge that he could face is ... if Trump says something is erroneous, do you correct him? Do you risk turning it into an argument?" said Jeffrey Rathke, a former U.S. diplomat and president of the American-German Institute at the Johns Hopkins University in Washington. "Or do you find a way to indicate that you see it differently, but not let it sidetrack the conversation." U.S. administration officials remain upset that Merz criticized Trump shortly before the 2024 U.S. election, a source familiar with its thinking said. And, on the eve of his own election victory, Merz criticised the "ultimately outrageous" comments flowing from Washington during the campaign, comparing them to hostile interventions from Russia. Another possible landmine could be a recent German proposal for a levy on online platforms such as Alphabet's Google, and Meta's Facebook, especially given Trump's close ties with the U.S. tech industry, he said. (Reporting by Sarah Marsh in Berlin, Andreas Rinke and Andrea Shalal in Washington; Editing by Sandra Maler)

Germany's Merz to face Trump in Oval Office on inaugural trip

Germany's Merz to face Trump in Oval Office on inaugural trip By Sarah Marsh, Andrea Shalal and Andreas Rinke BERLIN/WASHINGTON (Reuters...
Senate Democrats' campaign chief says 'every state's on the table' in fight for majorityNew Foto - Senate Democrats' campaign chief says 'every state's on the table' in fight for majority

Democrats will have to win some red states if they have any hope of taking control of the Senate next year, and the senator tasked with leading that effort believes President Donald Trump has given them an opening after he won those states easily months ago. "I look at the map, and every state's on the table because of this growing backlash that President Trump's decisions have created, with his cuts to Medicaid and his unwillingness to address affordability issues," Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., told NBC News in an interview at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee headquarters on Wednesday. Gillibrand also said she isn't ruling out taking sides in Democratic primaries as her party looks to net four Senate seats to take control of the chamber, saying that she is "definitely not ruling out anything in any state." "We're going to look at every state on a case-by-case basis and make our assessment as to who's the best candidate in that state, and then make decisions based on that," Gillibrand said. Democrats' ripest targets in 2026 are GOP Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, which Trump lost by nearly 7 percentage points in November, and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, which Trump won by 3 points. Both incumbents are battle-tested, winning contested races in their last cycles on the ballot. Former Democratic Rep. Wiley Nickel has already launched a run in North Carolina, while former House staffer Jordan Wood is running in Maine. But Democrats are still eyeing Maine Gov. Janet Mills and former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper aspossible recruits. While Cooper is weighing a run, Mills has not exactly sounded enthusiastic about challenging Collins,telling the Maine Trust for Local Newsin April, "I'm not planning to run for anything. Things change week to week, month to month, but at this moment I'm not planning to run for another office." Asked if it has been difficult to recruit against Collins, who has a record of winning tough races, including victory in 2020 even as Trump lost Maine decisively, Gillibrand said negative reaction to Trump's policies is "changing the thinking of a lot of potential candidates." "So I am certain we will have formidable candidates in North Carolina and Maine because of this growing backlash that President Trump has created," Gillibrand said. Even if Democrats win those two states, and hold on to their current seats in other battlegrounds, they would still need to flip two additional Senate seats in states Trump won by double digits last year to get to a majority. That could mean targeting ruby red states like Texas, Iowa, Alaska, South Carolina and others. Democrats do not currently hold a single Senate seat in the 24 states that Trump carried in all three of his presidential runs, after several red-state losses in 2024. And Trump won each of those states by double digits last year. Gillibrand said the "magic formula" for Democratic success involves a combination of "deep Republican backlash" to Trump and some of his policies, like slashing social safety net programs and imposing steep tariffs, and "extraordinarily strong candidates who represent their states well," as well as boosts from the DSCC to help those candidates build up their campaigns. Contested Democratic primaries are already taking shape in Iowa, where GOP Sen. Joni Ernst is up for re-election, as well as in competitive states where Democrats are defending open seats, including Michigan and Minnesota. Ernsthas also been in the spotlightfor responding to a constituent at a town hall who suggested the House Republicans' proposed Medicaid cuts could cause people to die and saying, "Well, we all are going to die." Asked if such comments give Democrats a better shot at defeating Ernst next year, Gillibrand said Ernst's remarks exemplify Trump's "very callous approach towards health care, cutting seniors, cutting people with disabilities, children, pregnant women and veterans off of their Medicaid." Gillibrand said those cuts are creating "a significant backlash that certainly puts a state like Iowa in play" along with "many other red states around the country." Democrats, meanwhile, are going to be focused on "commonsense, kitchen table issues" of affordability and public safety, Gillibrand said. The New York Democrat argued those were winning messages for successful candidates in her home state last year, where she led a coordinated campaign with Gov. Kathy Hochul and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries to boost Democratic House candidates. Democrats flipped three GOP-held House seats in New York even as Trump made gains throughout the state. Trump ultimately lost New York but improved on his 2020 election margin by 11 points, which was the biggest swing toward Trump of any state in the country. Republicans are looking to capitalize on Trump's gains as they target Hochul in her re-election run next year, as well as other House Democrats. (Gillibrand said she is supporting Hochul for re-election as she facesa primary challengefrom Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado.) Republicans are also looking to reprise attacks on Democrats over whether transgender women should be allowed to compete in female sports. One Nation, a nonprofit tied to the GOP super PAC Senate Leadership Fund,already launched an attackon the issue against Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff in Georgia. Ossoff represents one of two states, along with Michigan, that Democrats are defending that Trump also carried last year. "Each candidate will address it as they see fit," Gillibrand said when asked how Democrats should respond to those attacks. Gillibrand said she is "very optimistic that Sen. Ossoff will not only win his race, but show rest of the country, you know, who he is and what Democrats stand for."

Senate Democrats' campaign chief says 'every state's on the table' in fight for majority

Senate Democrats' campaign chief says 'every state's on the table' in fight for majority Democrats will have to win some red...
Congressional letter obtained by AP outlines drastic job cuts expected at Voice of AmericaNew Foto - Congressional letter obtained by AP outlines drastic job cuts expected at Voice of America

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration appointee overseeing theVoice of Americahas outlined job cuts that would reduce employment at the state-run news organization from over 1,000 people to 81. The Voice of America, which has delivered news to countries all over the world for the better part of a century, has been largely silent for two months following an executive order by PresidentDonald Trump. He believes Voice of America, and similar organizations like Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, have reported with a liberal bias. Most of VOA's employees have been on administrative leave since mid-March amid reports that layoff notices were forthcoming. Kari Lake, who has been overseeing the U.S. Agency for Global Media for Trump, outlined planned employment changes in a letter Tuesday to U.S. Sen. James Risch that was obtained by The Associated Press. Lake said Trump had directed the agency "to reduce the performance of its statutory functions and associated personnel to the minimum presence and function required by law." Some VOA employees are fighting for the organization's survival in court, and one of them — White House bureau chief Patsy Widakuswara — said Wednesday that it was absurd to think the staff could be cut to the levels Lake is suggesting. "You can't make staff this size produce content for a global audience of 360 million weekly," Widakuswara said. "It's comical if it weren't so tragic. We're not just losing our jobs and journalism, we are abdicating our voice and influence in the world." In April, afederal judge ruledthat the administration illegally shut down VOA. But an appellate panel later said that a lower courtdid not have the authorityto order that employees be brought back to work, keeping the agency in limbo. In court papers filed last week, lawyers for Widakuswara and fellow plaintiffs said the administration made a cursory attempt to indicate that VOA was operational by broadcasting five minutes of content to three provinces in Afghanistan on May 27. The Washington-area building where Voice of America has been operating has been put up for sale, while a lease has been canceled for a new building that the news operation was to move into, the court papers said. Lake's letter says the administration wants to keep 33 jobs overseen by her agency that broadcasts news to Cuba, along with two positions each to provide services to China and Afghanistan and in Farsi, the official language of Iran. Lakeannounced last monththat the pro-Trump news outlet One America News Network had agreed to provide a feed of its newscasts to VOA and other state-run services that broadcast in other countries. It's not clear whether any OAN feeds have been used yet. ___ Bauder reported from New York.

Congressional letter obtained by AP outlines drastic job cuts expected at Voice of America

Congressional letter obtained by AP outlines drastic job cuts expected at Voice of America WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration appoin...
Army leaders defend parade and border spending as Congress presses for answersNew Foto - Army leaders defend parade and border spending as Congress presses for answers

WASHINGTON (AP) — Army leaders on Wednesday defended spending as much as $45 million toadd a paradeto the service's 250th birthday celebration on June 14 in Washington, saying it will help boost recruitment, as Congress members argued that the money could be better spent on troops' barracks or other priorities. Members of the House Armed Services Committee also said they are concerned that the Defense Department is shifting about $1 billion from a variety of accounts — including base housing — to cover the costs of shoring up the defense of the southern border. Spending for the parade has become a flashpoint since it comes at a time when theTrumpadministration is slashing funding for personnel and programs across the federal government, including the Defense Department. While the Army has long planned for a festival on the National Mall to celebrate its 250th birthday, theparade was just recently added.President Donald Trump has long wanted a military parade in the city, after seeing an elaborate one in France on Bastille Day during his first presidential term, and June 14 is also his birthday. U.S. Rep. Salud Carbajal, D-Calif., questioned whether the additional cost of the parade was appropriate since all the military services are facing 8% budget cuts, and said perhaps it could be used to improve troops' quality of life or warfighting capabilities. He prodded Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll on what he would prioritize if Congress wrote him a blank check for $45 million. Driscoll replied that he thinks the parade offers a chance to tell the public about the Army. "I believe very specifically that telling that story will directly lead to a recruiting boom and will fill up our pipeline for the coming years," he said. At the same time, he and Gen. Randy George, chief of staff of the Army, told lawmakers that the service has now met its recruiting goal for the year — with 61,000 recruits.Army officials have predictedfor months that they would hit the target early after making a series of changes to recruiting programs, recruiters and policies over the past several years. That prompted Rep. Wesley Bell, D-Mo., to ask why the parade was needed for recruiting if it's already surging. Driscoll said the Army believes the parade "will empower an entire new generation of America's youth to catch the spirit to serve their nation." Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wisc., defended the parade spending, saying "you cannot put a price tag on patriotism." House members on both sides of the aisle pressed the Army about a recent request to shift money from across the budget to support the southern border. The biggest concern, they said, is that it takes money away from base housing, which has been plagued with persistent problems, including mold, rodents and raw sewage in barracks. Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., agreed the nation needs a strong border, but said lawmakers worked for the past year on a broad effort to address the housing problems. "I feel like a decision was made that undermined this whole effort that we spent the last year doing.," he said. Pressed on the issue by Carbajal, George acknowledged that redirecting the money has an impact on the barracks. "If we took $1 billion out of barracks, we would be able to fix less barracks," he agreed, but also said, ""You have to make choices, congressman."

Army leaders defend parade and border spending as Congress presses for answers

Army leaders defend parade and border spending as Congress presses for answers WASHINGTON (AP) — Army leaders on Wednesday defended spending...
Trump administration cuts 'Safety' from AI Safety InstituteNew Foto - Trump administration cuts 'Safety' from AI Safety Institute

The Trump administration says it's reforming a Biden-era artificial intelligence safety institute, renaming and reformulating one of the only federal government departments dedicated to oversight of the burgeoning technology. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in anews releaseTuesday that the Trump administration would transform the former U.S. AI Safety Institute — whichformer President Joe Biden established in November 2023— into the Center for AI Standards and Innovation. The reframing away from "safety" is in line with the Trump administration's statements and actions signaling its belief that oversight efforts for AI companies could unnecessarily dull the United States' competitive edge in the space. "For far too long, censorship and regulations have been used under the guise of national security. Innovators will no longer be limited by these standards," Lutnick said in the release. "CAISI will evaluate and enhance U.S. innovation of these rapidly developing commercial AI systems while ensuring they remain secure to our national security standards." The U.S. AI Safety Institute was created to evaluate and test AI models and create standards for safety and security. Italso formed a consortium on AI safety, which was made up of over 200 members, including OpenAI, Meta and Anthropic. Although it's unclear whether the transformation will mean any major changes to the institute's operations, the move appears to reflect the Trump administration's "pro-innovation" approach to deregulating AI technology. Unlike Biden's executive order on AI and the former institute, the reformed center is set to focus on additional aspects like evaluating "potential security vulnerabilities and malign foreign influence arising from use of adversaries' AI systems, including the possibility of backdoors and other covert, malicious behavior," as well as "guard against burdensome and unnecessary regulation of American technologies by foreign governments." In January, the Chinese-created AI app DeepSeek heightened national security concerns around AI with its latest release, which made waves with its advancements. President Donald Trump said the app "should be a wake-up call" about the prospect of international competition for American tech companies. Lawmakers introduced a bill to ban DeepSeek from government devices, and the Navy advised its members not to use it "in any capacity." The move to reform the institute appears to have been in development for a while.Reuters reportedthis year that no one from the U.S. AI Safety Institute's staff would attend anAI summit in Parisin February alongside Vice President JD Vance. The institute's inaugural director, Elizabeth Kelly, also announcedshe would step downthat month. In his speech at the summit, Vance echoed Lutnick's sentiments, saying, "We need international regulatory regimes that fosters the creation of AI technology rather than strangles it." He also spoke about how he believes AI should be free from "ideological bias." Since he returned to office, Trump has made it clear that his administration wants to embrace the expansion of AI. Within his first week, Trump announced the creation ofthe $500 billion Stargate initiativein collaboration with OpenAI, Oracle and SoftBank, which aims to make the United States a world leader in AI. Trump also signed anexecutive order on AIin his first week in office that focuses on easing regulations on AI technology and revoking "existing AI policies and directives that act as barriers to American AI innovation." Biden's executive order on AI, which focused onsafety and privacy standards for the technology, has been scrapped from the White House's website.

Trump administration cuts 'Safety' from AI Safety Institute

Trump administration cuts 'Safety' from AI Safety Institute The Trump administration says it's reforming a Biden-era artificial ...

 

VS POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com