Vatican could be a venue for Russia-Ukraine talks, Rubio says, after pope renews an offer to helpNew Foto - Vatican could be a venue for Russia-Ukraine talks, Rubio says, after pope renews an offer to help

ROME (AP) — U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Saturday that the Vatican could be a venue forRussia-Ukrainepeace talks, taking up the Holy See's longstanding offer after Pope Leo XIV vowed to personally make"every effort"to help end the war. Speaking to reporters in Rome before meeting withCardinal Matteo Zuppi, the Vatican point man on Ukraine, Rubio said that he would be discussing potential ways the Vatican could help, "the status of the talks, the updates after yesterday (Friday) and the path forward." Asked if the Vatican could be a peace broker, Rubio replied: "I wouldn't call it broker, but it's certainly — I think it's a place that both sides would be comfortable going." "So we'll talk about all of that and obviously always grateful to the Vatican for their willingness to play this constructive and positive role," he said at the U.S. Embassy in Rome. The Vatican has a tradition of diplomatic neutrality and had long offered its services to try to help facilitate talks, but found itself sidelined during the all-out war, which began on Feb. 24, 2022. Pope Francis, who oftenangered both sides with his comments, had entrusted Zuppi with a mandate to try to find paths of peace. But the mandate seemed to narrow to help facilitate the return of Ukrainian children taken by Russia, and the Holy See also was able to mediate someprisoner exchanges. Leo, who was elected history's first American pope on May 8, took up Francis' call for peace in Ukraine in hisfirst Sunday noon blessingas pope. He appealed for all sides to do whatever possible to reach "an authentic, just and lasting peace." Leo, who as a bishop in Peru had called Russia's war an "imperialist invasion," vowed this week personally to "makeevery effortso that this peace may prevail." In a speech to eastern rite Catholics, including the Greek Catholic Church of Ukraine, Leo begged warring sides to meet and negotiate. "The Holy See is always ready to help bring enemies together, face to face, to talk to one another, so that peoples everywhere may once more find hope and recover the dignity they deserve, the dignity of peace," he said. The Vatican secretary of state, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, repeated the Vatican's offer to serve as a venue for direct talks, saying thefailure of negotiations in Istanbulto reach a ceasefire this week was "tragic." "We had hoped it could start a process, slow but positive, toward a peaceful solution to the conflict," Parolin said on the sidelines of a conference. "But instead we're back to the beginning." Asked concretely what such an offer would entail, Parolin said that the Vatican could serve as a venue for a direct meeting between the two sides. "One would aim to arrive at this, that at least they talk. We'll see what happens. It's an offer of a place," he said. "We have always said, repeated to the two sides that we are available to you, with all the discretion needed," Parolin said. The Vatican scored what was perhaps itsgreatest diplomatic achievementof the Francis pontificate when it facilitated the talks between the United States and Cuba in 2014 that resulted in the resumption of diplomatic relations. The Holy See has also often hosted far less secret diplomatic initiatives, such as when it brought together the rival leaders of South Sudan in 2019. The encounter was made famous by the image of Francis bending down tokiss their feetto beg them to make peace. Perhaps the Holy See's mostcritical diplomatic initiativecame during the peak of the Cuban missile crisis when, in the fall of 1962, Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev ordered a secret deployment of nuclear missiles in Cuba that were soon detected by U.S. spy planes. As the Kennedy administration considered its response, with the threat of nuclear war looming, Pope John XXIII pleaded for peace in a public radio address, in a speech to Vatican ambassadors and also wrote privately to Kennedy and Khruschev, appealing to their love of their people to stand down. Many historians have credited John XXIII's appeals with helping both sides step back from the brink of nuclear war. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP'scollaborationwith The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.

Vatican could be a venue for Russia-Ukraine talks, Rubio says, after pope renews an offer to help

Vatican could be a venue for Russia-Ukraine talks, Rubio says, after pope renews an offer to help ROME (AP) — U.S. Secretary of State Marco ...
Trump administration, reversing Biden, allows 'forced reset triggers' for gunsNew Foto - Trump administration, reversing Biden, allows 'forced reset triggers' for guns

By Nate Raymond (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump's administration agreed on Friday to permit the sale and possession of devices that let gun enthusiasts convert semiautomatic rifles into weapons that can shoot as fast as machine guns. The agreement came in a settlement announced by the Department of Justice resolving lawsuits brought under Trump's Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, after his administration banned certain "forced-reset triggers." "This Department of Justice believes that the 2nd Amendment is not a second-class right," Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement, referring to the constitutional right to bear arms. "And we are glad to end a needless cycle of litigation with a settlement that will enhance public safety." The deal was condemned by Vanessa Gonzalez, vice president of government and political affairs at the gun control group Giffords, who said "the Trump administration has just effectively legalized machine guns." "Lives will be lost because of his actions," she said. In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives notified firearms licensees that it had determined some such devices constituted illegal machine guns under the National Firearms Act. The DOJ a year later filed a lawsuit in New York against a company that made and distributed such devices nationwide, Rare Breed Triggers, leading to a court ruling blocking it from continuing to sell them. In moving to prevent the sale of such devices, the Biden administration cited the frequency at which AR-15-style semiautomatic firearms have been used in mass shootings nationwide. While the New York case was pending, the National Association for Gun Rights filed a lawsuit in Texas challenging the Biden-era ban, leading to a judge concluding the ban was unlawful as he barred its enforcement. Friday's settlement resolved those lawsuits, which were on appeal, with an agreement to return all forced-reset triggers seized or surrendered to the government to their owners. The Trump administration agreed to not apply the machine gun ban to such devices so long as they are not designed for use with handguns. "This decision marks a new era of holding the DOJ and ATF accountable when they trample the rights of law-abiding gun owners," Dudley Brown, the National Association for Gun Rights' president, said in a statement. (Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Leigh Jones and William Mallard)

Trump administration, reversing Biden, allows 'forced reset triggers' for guns

Trump administration, reversing Biden, allows 'forced reset triggers' for guns By Nate Raymond (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Tru...
Flat Earth on the ballot? Debunked claim pops up in US politics.New Foto - Flat Earth on the ballot? Debunked claim pops up in US politics.

USA TODAY and Yahoo may earn commission from links in this article. Pricing and availability subject to change. Humans have knownthe Earth is roundfor more than 2,000 years, but a movementquestioning that facthas reached the corners of American politics. People involved in politics in Alabama, Georgia and Minnesota have attracted attention for their links to the flat Earth movement, although their beliefs and reasoning vary. To some, the beliefs have a spiritual connection. Others say they have a healthy skepticism of scientific consensus. Data from a 2021 University of New Hampshire surveyshows nearly 10% of Americans believe the Earth is flat, indicating how widespread pseudo-scientific conspiracy theories are emerging in the U.S. Meanwhile, political observers have met the emergence of some flat Earth beliefs in politics with a mix of alarm and apathy. Political candidates who believe the Earth is flat and other similar beliefs are "consistent with the current dumbing down and anti-intellectualism of America," saidJames Taylor, a political science professor at the University of San Francisco. Taylor said these theories have thrived mostly due to the internet and social media compared to 20 years ago. In Alabama, there'sDean Odle, a pastor who lost when he ran for governor in 2022, and is now seeking to become lieutenant governor next year. Odle, who describes himself as the "Anti-estabishment Republican," told USA TODAY he became "a flat-earth/biblical-earther believer" in 2015, even attending the inauguralFlat Earth International Conferencein 2017. He cites his 2019 self-published book, titled "Like Clay Under the Seal," saying his belief that the Earth is flat initially came as a "spiritual download from the Holy Spirit." Odle said he's aware of the flak he gets for his beliefs, but it won't stop him from running for office to try improving the state's low-ranking education status and stop the Second Amendment from being attacked. "I typically refer to Article VI, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which says no religious tests should be put on a person as a qualification or disqualification to run for office," Odle said. "What that means is we're all going to have different beliefs, but that doesn't mean we're unfit to protect the God-given constitutional rights of all Americans and Alabama residents." In Minnesota,Bret Bussman, an Army veteran who became Minnesota's 7th Congressional District Republican Party chair in March, has reportedly publicly sharedvideos on social mediaexplaining why he believes the Earth is flat. That includes a2024 Facebook posttitled, "5 Reasons Why I BELIEVE in the Flat Earth (And You Should Too!)." When asked about his beliefs by theMinnesota Reformerin April, Bussman said, "You can print whatever you want. I spent 20+ years in the Army defending that right, but if you do that, there would be no chance of me speaking with you in the future." (USA TODAY has reached out to Bussman for comment.) And in Georgia,Kandiss Taylor, a former Georgia Republican gubernatorial candidate and the state's currentDistrict 1 GOP Chair, has announced she's running for Congress in 2026. She faced scrutiny after interviewingtwo prominent flat Earth believerson a podcast two years ago, at one point saying: "Everywhere there's globes. It's constant…and that's what they do to brainwash," Taylor said. "For me, if it is not a conspiracy, if it is, you know, 'real,' why are you pushing so hard? Everywhere I go, every store, you buy a globe, there's globes everywhere—every movie, every TV show, news media. Why? It doesn't make sense." Taylor has since said she does not believe the Earth is flat, but that she remains skeptical. "I will clearly state that I simply do not believe anything that I have not seen for myself," Taylor said in an emailed statement to USA TODAY. "With that being said, I will gladly take one of those 11-minute rocket flights to the stratosphere (Like Katy Perry did) and report back to the people what I see." In general, mostflat-earthers believeEarth is a flat, hockey-puck-like object covered by a dome, sometimes called a firmament, with walls of ice around the edges of the dome. Flat-earthers think they can prove this because the seas appear level, not curved, and say it is not possible to view the Earth's curvature of the horizon from airplanes. They also dispute photographic evidence from space, saying it cannot be trusted and that the NASA moon landing was a hoax. Fact check roundup:Debunking the flawed science behind flat Earth claims Although some flat Earth believers have been active in politics, there's no evidence of an organized flat-earther movement in U.S. politics, political experts told USA TODAY. "You're unlikely to have candidates openly saying they think the earth is flat because it sounds like a goofier position and a less widely held belief," saidJohn Cluverius, a political science professor at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. "I hesitate to think about this as a conspiracy theory as much as it is an anti-science belief that can be countered with scientific evidence." Round and round:Surreal April 2024 total solar eclipse renews debunked flat Earth conspiracy theories There's a common flat Earth error, popularized in the 19th century, suggesting that before scientific study began in the 17th century, most people believed the Earth was indeed flat. However, ancient Greeks figured out the Earth was roundaround 500 B.C., and it's beencommonly accepted by scholars, navigators and cartographerssince. The flat Earth belief as a conspiracy theory rose again inthe mid-1800s in England.The Flat Earth Society was founded in 1956. Then, flat-earthers hada resurgence in the 2010sas the rise of social media became a portal for conspiracy theorists, as James Taylor, the San Francisco political scientist, mentioned. Contributing: Elizabeth Wiese, Doyle Rice, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Flat Earth on the ballot? Some politicians linked to debunked claim.

Flat Earth on the ballot? Debunked claim pops up in US politics.

Flat Earth on the ballot? Debunked claim pops up in US politics. USA TODAY and Yahoo may earn commission from links in this article. Pricing...
Speaker Mike Johnson's bluff-calling strategy reaches its limit: From the Politics DeskNew Foto - Speaker Mike Johnson's bluff-calling strategy reaches its limit: From the Politics Desk

Welcome to the online version ofFrom the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, Sahil Kapur explains how a failed committee vote revealed the limitations of Speaker Mike Johnson's tactics for dealing with the hard-right rebels in his conference. Plus, we have a sneak peek of Kristen Welker's "Meet the Press" interview with former Vice President Mike Pence. And Gary Grumbach answer's this week's reader question on President Donald Trump's efforts to defund public media. Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here. — Adam Wollner House Speaker Mike Johnson's run of (relative) smooth sailing came to an abrupt end Friday when he faced his first tangible setback on a massive party-line bill for President Donald Trump's agenda —a failed vote in the House Budget Committee. Until now, Johnson had been successful at steering the plan through the narrowly divided House. There was the original budget framework that the House adopted in February, followed by the Senate-approved blueprint that the lower chamber passed in April, despite strong reservations from the hard-liners in Johnson's conference. That allowed the House to actually begin drafting the specifics of the legislation. And this week, Johnson and his leadership team managed to get 11 House committees to approve their portions of the broader package. The legislation was then sent to the Budget Committee, on the assumption that some revisions would be still needed to send it to the full chamber next week ahead of Johnson's Memorial Day Weekend deadline. Throughout the process, Johnson often called bluff on the persistent gripes of a group of far-right spending hawks, forcing them to take votes and assuming they would not be willing to stand in the way of Trump's agenda. It's a strategy that proved successful time and again. But on Friday, four conservatives on the Budget Committee had enough, following through on their pledge to block the measure from reaching the House floor. They slammed the bill for using budget gimmicks to trigger its benefits right away and postpone its painful cuts for years. And they noted that the multitrillion-dollar package would blow up the national debt. Now comes the moment of truth.And the limits of the slim House Republican majority, where the party has just three votes to spare, are about to test Johnson's prowess like never before. The hard-liners are demanding that the spending cuts to Medicaid, clean energy funding and other programs take effect sooner. That means imposing political pain on vulnerable GOP lawmakers ahead of the next presidential election — perhaps even before the 2026 midterms — and putting swing districts at risk. But if Johnson fails to meet their demands, are the hard-liners willing to sink the bill entirely? Or was their vote Friday more of a symbolic protest to gain negotiating leverage? Surely, they'll be hearing from Trump if they persist. (Before Friday's committee vote, Trump called out GOP "GRANDSTANDERS" onTruth Social.) The speaker is also feeling the squeeze from another corner of the conference. At least four New York Republicans are threatening to bring down the entire bill on the House floor unless party leaders expand thestate and local tax (SALT) deductionthat the current legislation sets at $30,000. That demand has caused consternation among other Republicans, who largely represent districts where SALT isn't heavily used. And even if Johnson steers the package through the chamber, Senate Republicanshave already put the House on noticethat the legislation won't pass the upper chamber without major changes. Up next:The House Budget Committee isset to reconveneSunday at 10 p.m. ET to vote again on the bill. Former Vice President Mike Pence said Friday that President Donald Trump should not accept a luxury jet from Qatar to use as the next Air Force One,telling NBC News' "Meet the Press" moderator Kristen Welkerthat the move would raise security and constitutional concerns. "First we've got to remember who Qatar is. We've got a military base there. I have members of our immediate family that have deployed to the region," said Pence. "But Qatar has a long history of playing both sides," Pence said in the exclusive interview at his home in Indiana. "They support Hamas. They supported Al Qaeda. Qatar has actually financed pro-Hamas protests on American campuses across the United States." Pence added that accepting the plane as the next Air Force One "is inconsistent with our security, with our intelligence needs. And my hope is the president reconsiders it." Pence added that there are "very real constitutional issues," noting the part of the Constitution that bars public officials from accepting gifts from a foreign government. "I think it's just a bad idea, and my hope is the president will think better of it," Pence said. Watch the clip here → And check out the full interview with Pence on "Meet the Press" this Sunday. Thanks to everyone who emailed us! This week's question comes from Polly Moore: "How can Trump defund programs established by Congress, such as public TV and National Public Radio?" To answer that, we turned to legal affairs reporterGary Grumbach. Here's his response: President Donald Trump has been attempting to defund programs established by Congress, but he's hitting roadblocks almost every time. Because here's the thing — there are legal ways to defund programs established by Congress. It happens every year when the budget process gets underway, with input from both sides of the aisle in both chambers of Congress. But Congress, by law, has to be involved in that process. It's when they're not, and when a program is stripped down beyond its congressionally mandated levels, that we start seeing legal action being taken. And that legal action has been fast and furious. Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting have all sued over the Trump administration's attempts to defund or dismantle their organizations that were created and funded by congressional appropriations. But it hasn't been an easy road. As it stands today, an appeals court has temporarily blocked a lower court's order that would have restarted funding and brought back employees of Voice of America and Radio Free Europe, while appeals are underway. ⚖️ SCOTUS watch:The Supreme Court dealt a blow against the Trump administration's attempt to send Venezuelans it says are gang members to a notorious prison in El Salvador, saying the detainees must have a proper chance to raise legal objections.Read more → ✈️Foreign trip recap:Trump is returning to Washington after a diplomatic tour of the Middle East, where he pitched American business and secured investment pledges but failed to reach long-promised peace deals in Gaza and Ukraine.Read more → 🤝 Deal or no deal:Trump told reporters on Air Force One before his flight back to the U.S. that his special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, has submitted a formal proposal for a nuclear deal with Iran.Read more → 🤝 Deal or no deal, cont.:Russia and Ukraine sat down to hold their first direct peace talks since the early months of the war, agreeing to a deal to swap 1,000 prisoners each.Read more → 👀Comey re-enters the chat:The Department of Homeland Security and Secret Service are investigating a social media post by former FBI Director James Comey that several U.S. officials interpreted as calling for Trump's assassination.Read more → ⛴️ Tariff impact:Businesses have begun ramping up shipments to the U.S. from China after Trump paused some of his tariffs on imports from that country, creating a surge in demand that could lead to supply chain bottlenecks in the coming months.Read more → 🔵 Garden (State) party:The New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial primary is hitting it's final stretch, with Rep. Mikie Sherrill seen as the front-runner.Read more → 🔴 Clearing the way:Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost suspended his campaign for governor one week after the state Republican Party followed Trump's lead in endorsing Vivek Ramaswamy.Read more → 🗳️ 2028 watch:California Gov. Gavin Newsom is taking a tougher stance on homelessness ahead of a potential bid for president.Read more → Follow live politics updates → That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner and Ben Kamisar. If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us atpoliticsnewsletter@nbcuni.com And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign uphere.

Speaker Mike Johnson's bluff-calling strategy reaches its limit: From the Politics Desk

Speaker Mike Johnson's bluff-calling strategy reaches its limit: From the Politics Desk Welcome to the online version ofFrom the Politic...
Donald Trump slams Supreme Court ruling blocking deportation without a court hearingNew Foto - Donald Trump slams Supreme Court ruling blocking deportation without a court hearing

PresidentDonald Trumpsaidthe Supreme Court's decisionlimiting his ability to deport immigrants without a court hearing represents "a bad and dangerous day for America." Ina post on his Truth Social siteon May 16, Trump slammed thehigh court's ruling blocking his administration from using a 1798 wartime law to deport a group of Venezuelan migrants. The migrants argued who said they had not been given enough of a chance to contest their removal. The presidentinvoked the Alien Enemies Actin March when he designated a Venezuelan gang known as Tren de Aragua as a "foreign terrorist organization." Alleged gang members have since been deported to a mega-prison in El Salvador. In an unsigned opinion, the court said the migrants haven't had enough time or information to protect their rights. That's important, the court said, because the administration has previously said it can't bring back a man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador. "The result of this decision will let more CRIMINALS pour into our Country, doing great harm to our cherished American public," Trump said in his post. "TheSupreme Court of the United Statesis not allowing me to do what I was elected to do." More:Called out by Trump for how he leads the Supreme Court, John Roberts is fine keeping a low profile Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, saying in part that the court didn't have the authority to weigh in at this stage. The majority opinion was unsigned. By invoking the Alien Enemies Act, the Trump administration "has tapped into vast powers never previously used for routine immigration enforcement," according toa report by the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump attacks Supreme Court after it blocks Venezuelan deportations

Donald Trump slams Supreme Court ruling blocking deportation without a court hearing

Donald Trump slams Supreme Court ruling blocking deportation without a court hearing PresidentDonald Trumpsaidthe Supreme Court's decisi...

 

VS POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com