Speaker Mike Johnson's bluff-calling strategy reaches its limit: From the Politics DeskNew Foto - Speaker Mike Johnson's bluff-calling strategy reaches its limit: From the Politics Desk

Welcome to the online version ofFrom the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, Sahil Kapur explains how a failed committee vote revealed the limitations of Speaker Mike Johnson's tactics for dealing with the hard-right rebels in his conference. Plus, we have a sneak peek of Kristen Welker's "Meet the Press" interview with former Vice President Mike Pence. And Gary Grumbach answer's this week's reader question on President Donald Trump's efforts to defund public media. Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here. — Adam Wollner House Speaker Mike Johnson's run of (relative) smooth sailing came to an abrupt end Friday when he faced his first tangible setback on a massive party-line bill for President Donald Trump's agenda —a failed vote in the House Budget Committee. Until now, Johnson had been successful at steering the plan through the narrowly divided House. There was the original budget framework that the House adopted in February, followed by the Senate-approved blueprint that the lower chamber passed in April, despite strong reservations from the hard-liners in Johnson's conference. That allowed the House to actually begin drafting the specifics of the legislation. And this week, Johnson and his leadership team managed to get 11 House committees to approve their portions of the broader package. The legislation was then sent to the Budget Committee, on the assumption that some revisions would be still needed to send it to the full chamber next week ahead of Johnson's Memorial Day Weekend deadline. Throughout the process, Johnson often called bluff on the persistent gripes of a group of far-right spending hawks, forcing them to take votes and assuming they would not be willing to stand in the way of Trump's agenda. It's a strategy that proved successful time and again. But on Friday, four conservatives on the Budget Committee had enough, following through on their pledge to block the measure from reaching the House floor. They slammed the bill for using budget gimmicks to trigger its benefits right away and postpone its painful cuts for years. And they noted that the multitrillion-dollar package would blow up the national debt. Now comes the moment of truth.And the limits of the slim House Republican majority, where the party has just three votes to spare, are about to test Johnson's prowess like never before. The hard-liners are demanding that the spending cuts to Medicaid, clean energy funding and other programs take effect sooner. That means imposing political pain on vulnerable GOP lawmakers ahead of the next presidential election — perhaps even before the 2026 midterms — and putting swing districts at risk. But if Johnson fails to meet their demands, are the hard-liners willing to sink the bill entirely? Or was their vote Friday more of a symbolic protest to gain negotiating leverage? Surely, they'll be hearing from Trump if they persist. (Before Friday's committee vote, Trump called out GOP "GRANDSTANDERS" onTruth Social.) The speaker is also feeling the squeeze from another corner of the conference. At least four New York Republicans are threatening to bring down the entire bill on the House floor unless party leaders expand thestate and local tax (SALT) deductionthat the current legislation sets at $30,000. That demand has caused consternation among other Republicans, who largely represent districts where SALT isn't heavily used. And even if Johnson steers the package through the chamber, Senate Republicanshave already put the House on noticethat the legislation won't pass the upper chamber without major changes. Up next:The House Budget Committee isset to reconveneSunday at 10 p.m. ET to vote again on the bill. Former Vice President Mike Pence said Friday that President Donald Trump should not accept a luxury jet from Qatar to use as the next Air Force One,telling NBC News' "Meet the Press" moderator Kristen Welkerthat the move would raise security and constitutional concerns. "First we've got to remember who Qatar is. We've got a military base there. I have members of our immediate family that have deployed to the region," said Pence. "But Qatar has a long history of playing both sides," Pence said in the exclusive interview at his home in Indiana. "They support Hamas. They supported Al Qaeda. Qatar has actually financed pro-Hamas protests on American campuses across the United States." Pence added that accepting the plane as the next Air Force One "is inconsistent with our security, with our intelligence needs. And my hope is the president reconsiders it." Pence added that there are "very real constitutional issues," noting the part of the Constitution that bars public officials from accepting gifts from a foreign government. "I think it's just a bad idea, and my hope is the president will think better of it," Pence said. Watch the clip here → And check out the full interview with Pence on "Meet the Press" this Sunday. Thanks to everyone who emailed us! This week's question comes from Polly Moore: "How can Trump defund programs established by Congress, such as public TV and National Public Radio?" To answer that, we turned to legal affairs reporterGary Grumbach. Here's his response: President Donald Trump has been attempting to defund programs established by Congress, but he's hitting roadblocks almost every time. Because here's the thing — there are legal ways to defund programs established by Congress. It happens every year when the budget process gets underway, with input from both sides of the aisle in both chambers of Congress. But Congress, by law, has to be involved in that process. It's when they're not, and when a program is stripped down beyond its congressionally mandated levels, that we start seeing legal action being taken. And that legal action has been fast and furious. Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting have all sued over the Trump administration's attempts to defund or dismantle their organizations that were created and funded by congressional appropriations. But it hasn't been an easy road. As it stands today, an appeals court has temporarily blocked a lower court's order that would have restarted funding and brought back employees of Voice of America and Radio Free Europe, while appeals are underway. ⚖️ SCOTUS watch:The Supreme Court dealt a blow against the Trump administration's attempt to send Venezuelans it says are gang members to a notorious prison in El Salvador, saying the detainees must have a proper chance to raise legal objections.Read more → ✈️Foreign trip recap:Trump is returning to Washington after a diplomatic tour of the Middle East, where he pitched American business and secured investment pledges but failed to reach long-promised peace deals in Gaza and Ukraine.Read more → 🤝 Deal or no deal:Trump told reporters on Air Force One before his flight back to the U.S. that his special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, has submitted a formal proposal for a nuclear deal with Iran.Read more → 🤝 Deal or no deal, cont.:Russia and Ukraine sat down to hold their first direct peace talks since the early months of the war, agreeing to a deal to swap 1,000 prisoners each.Read more → 👀Comey re-enters the chat:The Department of Homeland Security and Secret Service are investigating a social media post by former FBI Director James Comey that several U.S. officials interpreted as calling for Trump's assassination.Read more → ⛴️ Tariff impact:Businesses have begun ramping up shipments to the U.S. from China after Trump paused some of his tariffs on imports from that country, creating a surge in demand that could lead to supply chain bottlenecks in the coming months.Read more → 🔵 Garden (State) party:The New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial primary is hitting it's final stretch, with Rep. Mikie Sherrill seen as the front-runner.Read more → 🔴 Clearing the way:Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost suspended his campaign for governor one week after the state Republican Party followed Trump's lead in endorsing Vivek Ramaswamy.Read more → 🗳️ 2028 watch:California Gov. Gavin Newsom is taking a tougher stance on homelessness ahead of a potential bid for president.Read more → Follow live politics updates → That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner and Ben Kamisar. If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us atpoliticsnewsletter@nbcuni.com And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign uphere.

Speaker Mike Johnson's bluff-calling strategy reaches its limit: From the Politics Desk

Speaker Mike Johnson's bluff-calling strategy reaches its limit: From the Politics Desk Welcome to the online version ofFrom the Politic...
Donald Trump slams Supreme Court ruling blocking deportation without a court hearingNew Foto - Donald Trump slams Supreme Court ruling blocking deportation without a court hearing

PresidentDonald Trumpsaidthe Supreme Court's decisionlimiting his ability to deport immigrants without a court hearing represents "a bad and dangerous day for America." Ina post on his Truth Social siteon May 16, Trump slammed thehigh court's ruling blocking his administration from using a 1798 wartime law to deport a group of Venezuelan migrants. The migrants argued who said they had not been given enough of a chance to contest their removal. The presidentinvoked the Alien Enemies Actin March when he designated a Venezuelan gang known as Tren de Aragua as a "foreign terrorist organization." Alleged gang members have since been deported to a mega-prison in El Salvador. In an unsigned opinion, the court said the migrants haven't had enough time or information to protect their rights. That's important, the court said, because the administration has previously said it can't bring back a man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador. "The result of this decision will let more CRIMINALS pour into our Country, doing great harm to our cherished American public," Trump said in his post. "TheSupreme Court of the United Statesis not allowing me to do what I was elected to do." More:Called out by Trump for how he leads the Supreme Court, John Roberts is fine keeping a low profile Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, saying in part that the court didn't have the authority to weigh in at this stage. The majority opinion was unsigned. By invoking the Alien Enemies Act, the Trump administration "has tapped into vast powers never previously used for routine immigration enforcement," according toa report by the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump attacks Supreme Court after it blocks Venezuelan deportations

Donald Trump slams Supreme Court ruling blocking deportation without a court hearing

Donald Trump slams Supreme Court ruling blocking deportation without a court hearing PresidentDonald Trumpsaidthe Supreme Court's decisi...
Republicans seek to boost AI while tightening grip on social media and online speechNew Foto - Republicans seek to boost AI while tightening grip on social media and online speech

Republican lawmakers have introduced legislation over the last week that could give the federal government a tighter grasp on some tech platforms, while easing up government scrutiny on artificial intelligence. The Republican-led House Energy and Commerce Committee's budget reconciliation bill was introduced Tuesday and would give the federal government the ability to update IT systems as well as use AI systems at the Commerce Department. The bill would also put a pause on states' ability to enforce AI regulations for the next decade to allow the American AI market to grow and be studied. While some politicians have been skeptical and critical of AI, the Trump administration has been vocal about seeking to encourage the growth of the AI industry in the U.S.with few guardrails. On Friday, to cap off President Donald Trump's Middle East trip, the administrationannounced a dealwith the United Arab Emirates to build a massive data center in the country that will serve American tech companies. While Republicans have worked to protect AI, lawmakers have also introduced bills that would tighten regulations on some tech companies. Two of the bills could make rules for tech platforms and their users more restrictive with the intent of making children safer online. On May 8, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), which would update "the legal definition of obscenity for the internet age," Lee said in astatement. IODA was first introduced in 2022, and again in 2024, but failed to become law. IODA would change the definition of obscenity, which applies athree-pronged testto content, to anything that "appeals to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion," and "depicts, describes or represents actual or simulated sexual acts with the objective intent to arouse, titillate, or gratify the sexual desires of a person." It's currently illegal to transmit obscene content via telecommunications if it's intended as harassment or abuse. The bill would remove the requirement for that "intent," meaning it could criminalize any content deemed obscene that is transmitted via telecommunications systems. Despite the bill lacking bipartisan support or additional recorded co-sponsors, it has gained attention online and in the media for language that could make pornography something that can be prosecuted under laws pertaining to obscenity. However, proponents of the law hope it will prevent children from viewing lewd and obscene content. Currently, social media platforms are granted a "good faith" immunity underSection 230of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which means they can't be held legally liable for most content posted on their sites, aside from a few exceptions. Although a news release from Lee about IODA didn't specify who would be held legally responsible for newly obscene content, it said the bill is meant to create a uniform definition of obscenity, so it would be easier to identify and prosecute obscene content. "Obscenity isn't protected by the First Amendment, but hazy and unenforceable legal definitions have allowed extreme pornography to saturate American society and reach countless children," Lee said in the statement. "Our bill updates the legal definition of obscenity for the internet age so this content can be taken down and its peddlers prosecuted." On Wednesday, the bi-partisan Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), which would hold websites accountable if they host content that is harmful to children, was reintroduced in the Senate. KOSA was first introduced in 2022 by Sens. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., but failed to make it out of the chamber. During the 2023-2024 congressional term, KOSA was introduced again with amendments to address concerns over the vague wording in the bill. In July, KOSA passed in the Senate, but by the end of 2024, it had failed to advance in the House. The latest version ofKOSA statesthat the bill would require social media platforms to "remove addictive product features," give parents more control and oversight of their kids' social media, create a duty for platforms to mitigate content focused on topics like suicide and disordered eating, and require transparency from social media platforms to share the steps they're taking to protect children. Those who are in favor of the bill say it would hold platforms legally accountable if they host harmful content that minors should not view. Opponents said it could inadvertently affect sites that host LGBTQ content. They're also concerned it could lead to more censorship online. "Sponsors are claiming—again—that the latest version won't censor online content. It isn't true. This bill still sets up a censorship regime disguised as a 'duty of care,' and it will do what previous versions threatened: suppress lawful, important speech online, especially for young people," Joe Mullin, senior policy analyst for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said in a statement. However, updates made to the bill help to make its reach less broad and remove attorneys' general ability to prosecute platforms. It also makes more precise the harm it expects social media and other websites to protect against. This has led to some opponents of the bill changing their stance. The bill was reintroduced with Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., signing on. Last year, the bill passed in the Senate, 91-3, but died in the House. The current bill has been backed by Apple and Republican figures including Trump and Elon Musk. In a statement, Apple's senior director of government affairs for the Americas, Timothy Powderly, said the company was happy to offer its support for the bill, adding that everyone has a role to play in keeping children safe online. He also acknowledged the concerns around KOSA and praised the senators for working to improve the bill. "As longtime advocates of privacy as a fundamental right, we believe these improvements are important, and hopefully the first steps towards comprehensive privacy legislation that ensures everyone's right to privacy online," Powderly said. Critics have pushed back on both bills as some say they could result in overly policed speech online. Matt Navarra, a social media consultant and analyst who has worked with companies like Google and the U.S. and U.K. governments, said the bills — particularly KOSA — could have significant ramifications for social media platforms and the way people use them. Navarra said KOSA would force platforms to "rethink recommendation engines, notifications, data tracking works for minors." "For engagement-driven platforms like TikTok or Instagram, that's a radical shift — it's not just about what's allowed, it's about how addictive and immersive experiences get redesigned or dismantled," he said. "So KOSA is less about content policing and more about an algorithmic detox especially for teens." Adults would likely also see a major change in what is accessible online if IODA becomes law. "In terms of the things that people are concerned about with the bill, particularly around censorship, KOSA does sort of introduce a duty of care that sounds good in theory but in practice could push platforms into over-moderating or flat-out removing content just to avoid the risk," Navarra said. "And the obscenity bill wraps this up even more."

Republicans seek to boost AI while tightening grip on social media and online speech

Republicans seek to boost AI while tightening grip on social media and online speech Republican lawmakers have introduced legislation over t...
Flights resume at the rebel-held airport in Yemen's capital, more than a week after Israeli strikesNew Foto - Flights resume at the rebel-held airport in Yemen's capital, more than a week after Israeli strikes

CAIRO (AP) — Flights resumed on Saturday to Yemen's capital of Sanaa, held by the country's Iran-backed Houthi rebels, more than a week aftermassive Israeli airstrikes disabled the airport. The Israeli strikes on May 6 — a rare daytime attack — destroyed the airport's terminal and left craters on its runway, according to Khaled al-Shaif, the head of the airport. At least six passenger planes were hit, including three belonging to the national carrier, Yemen Airway or Yemenia, he said. On Saturday, a flight operated by Yemenia landed at the Sanaa International Airport with 136 passengers on board, according to the Houthis' al-Masirah satellite news channel. The flight had departed from Jordan's capital, Amman, earlier in the day, the airliner said. Three more flights were scheduled on Saturday between Sanaa and Amman. The Israeli offensive was in response toa Houthi ballistic missile that hit the grounds of Ben-GurionInternational Airport near Tel Aviv, which briefly halted flights and commuter traffic. The Houthis have targeted Israel throughoutIsrael's war with the militant Hamas groupin Gaza, in solidarity with Palestinians there, while also targeting commercial and naval vessels on the Red Sea. The attacks have raised the Houthis' profile at home and internationally as the last member of Iran's self-described "Axis of Resistance" capable of launching regular attacks on Israel. Since mid-March, the U.S. military underPresident Donald Trumplaunched an intensified campaign of daily airstrikes targeting the Houthis. The two sides reached a deal to halt theU.S. campaign in return for the Houthis halting their attacks on shipping. However, the U.S.-Houthis deal did not stop the rebels' missile and drone attacks on Israel, which in turn responded with attacks on Yemen's Red Sea ports held by the Houthis. On Friday, the Israeli military said it struck the Hodeida and Salif ports, claiming that the Houthis were using the two facilities to transfer weapons. The Houthi-run health ministry said at least one person was killed and 11 others were wounded in Friday's airstrikes.

Flights resume at the rebel-held airport in Yemen’s capital, more than a week after Israeli strikes

Flights resume at the rebel-held airport in Yemen's capital, more than a week after Israeli strikes CAIRO (AP) — Flights resumed on Satu...
Arrival of Afrikaners renews focus on plight of thousands of other refugees still in limboNew Foto - Arrival of Afrikaners renews focus on plight of thousands of other refugees still in limbo

Yasmin Aguilar resettled in Boise, Idaho as a refugee from Afghanistan years ago, but the dangers for her relatives worsened over time. Late last year, after years of waiting, her brother and sister were finally on the cusp of joining her. Then President Donald Trump took office for his second term. Trump in January suspended the decades-old refugee program. It left their approvals in limbo and their families stuck in Pakistan, unable to work and increasingly fearing deportation to Afghanistan. This week, her family's struggles contrasted sharply with the fast-tracked arrival of 59 Afrikaners, members of a White ethnic minority in South Africa that Trump says suffers from racial discrimination. At least nine are now resettling in Idaho. Aguilar, 54, said people at risk should be able to seek safety, including the South African families moving to Twin Falls, an agricultural town about 120 miles from Boise. But she said other refugees, including Afghans who supported the U.S. war efforts, deserve similar consideration. Now she's among the refugee advocates, sponsors and relatives hoping the controversial arrival of Afrikaners brings renewed attention to the plight of tens of thousands of refugees like her siblings who went through years of waiting, vetting and approvals but remain stuck – some in camps and third countries – despite the admission of the Afrikaners. On May 15, those hopes faced a setback when a federal judge pulled back his order that would have required the Trump administration to admit 12,000 refugees who had arranged travel.  Instead he is requiring 160 admissions for those who had travel set for within two weeks of Jan. 20 when Trump took office, with the rest decided on a case-by-case basis. Aguilar, who bought a larger home with her husband to house her relatives years ago, enduring delays from the pandemic and Trump's first term refugee restrictions, said she's 'trying to be hopeful." "I'm glad that people are searching for safety. I don't have any issue about that," she said in an interview with USA TODAY."We have to have a fair system for everyone." The newly arrived Afrikaners, part of a minority ethnic group who once ruled the country's system of apartheid that ended in 1994 when Nelson Madela was elected president, flew on May 12 to Washington D.C.'s Dulles airport. Most did not speak to reporters, but Will Hartzenberg, a 44-year-old farmer, toldThe Atlanticthat his family was headed to Idaho, where farms and mountains reminded him of home. He said his parents and sister had been shot during an attack on the family farm in 1993. Trump this week said "a genocide" was taking place and that "White farmers are being brutally killed." He also cited South Africa's Expropriation Act governing the acquisition of private land for the "public interest." Disparities in land ownership continue decades after apartheid ended. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has disputed Trump's claims. And the group Genocide Watch has noted that while South Africa's population is 8% White,White residents make up just 2%of its murder victims. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau greeted the arrivals at Dulles and said he respected "what you had to deal with" and "the long tradition of your people," in reference to the Afrikaner ethnic group. "Welcome to the United States of America," Landau told them. "It is such an honor for us to receive you here today." The move brought swift criticisms. Refugees typically must first be designated by the United Nations. Most wait years for interviews and vetting before a small fraction are resettled to third countries. The Afrikaners were approved following a Trump order in February. The Episcopal Church decided May 12 it would no longer work with refugees for the federal government after it was asked to help settle the Afrikaners. "It has been painful to watch one group of refugees, selected in a highly unusual manner, receive preferential treatment over many others who have been waiting in refugee camps or dangerous conditions for years," Presiding Bishop Sean Rowe said in a letter. Other agencies that do similar work were busy this week helping some of the families resettle in communities across the country. They will receive the same services that would be available to any new refugee arrival, including case management, employment services, housing assistance and limited financial assistance, according to the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants. In North Carolina, Marc Wyatt, head of the group Welcome House Raleigh Ministries, told USA TODAY his group was helping furnish apartments for several Afrikaner families. While the group's designation as refugees was "quite controversial," he said his Christian faith teaches him to welcome any stranger. In Alabama, Errol Langton 48, a former vegetable farmer, told theNew York Timeshe'd faced threats and suffered financially because of antipathy toward Afrikaners. He already had a brother in Birmingham, Alabama, where he has resettled. In New York, Charl Kleinhaus, 46,told the BBChe wanted to ensure his children would be safe after getting threats about his land. He remarked about how quickly he got to the country. Along with the larger freeze, the Department of Homeland Security said recently it would end Temporary Protected Status for Afghans in July, arguing there was an improved security and economic situation. That's something Afghans such as Aguilar dispute. "I mean, I feel sorry for the Afghans that they can't get here. But I know there's a process there," Kleinhaus said. "And I know when and if you are approved for the process, they take care of you." Eskinder Negash, president of the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, a resettlement group, said in a statement he hoped the admissions would spark a reopening for other refugees. So far, however, there were few signs of it apart from plans to bring in more South Africans. "We are hopeful that the arrival of this group of refugees indicates the government's intention to restart the U.S. refugee program and help other refugees in need of resettlement services," he said. In Twin Falls, nine people, who are part of two families, were preparing to start new lives, said Holly Beech, a spokesperson for the Idaho Office for Refugees. Over the last decade, the state resettled about 800 refugees a year, an average taking into account Trump's first term restrictions, the pandemic, the fall of Kabul and the war in Ukraine. A Twin Falls resettlement agency holds an annual picnic where refugees cook food as a thank you to the community, she said. Elsewhere, there is also support for refugees, who are highly vetted in contrast to those who cross the southern border to seek asylum. That's how Joe Mitchell, a retiree who has helped sponsor Afghan refugees in his town of Idaho Falls, sees it. "Even though Idaho is a red state and Idaho Falls is even redder, our community has been outstanding as a welcoming community," Mitchell said. He and his wife, Kim Mitchell, said the Afghans they sponsored through the Welcome Corps, since canceled by the Trump administration, attend community college and are all working and supporting themselves. But two men's wives, one with a child, are still seeking to be reunited through a family reunification program. One hasn't yet met his child, who was born after he fled. "Why doesn't my dad come? Doesn't he love me?" Kim Mitchell said the child asks her mother often. Since the Jan. 20 pause, in which Trump's executive order cited the inability "to absorb large numbers of migrants, and in particular, refugees, into its communities in a manner that does not compromise the availability of resources for Americans" and other issues, only a handful of refugees have been able to resettle in Idaho, officials said. Danilo Zak, director of policy for resettlement agency Church World Service, said there are more than 100,000 people in the U.S. refugee pipeline who are now stranded, including 22,000 who had completed all their medical and security screenings and 12,000 who had travel booked. After Trump halted the refugee program, freezing funding for processing and resettlement aid, a group of refugees and resettlement agencies filed a federal lawsuit challenging shutdown. On May 15, a federal judge revamped his earlier order that the U.S. resettle the 12,000 after an appeals court clarification. This led the judge to require the resettlement of just those who had travel arranged for the two weeks following the shutdown. Eligibility for others would be examined on a case-by-case basis. How that will work is still being determined. Trump's executive order pausing the program required a report from the secretaries of state and homeland security every 90 days, "until I determine that resumption of the USRAP is in the interests of the United States."No 90-day report has yet been released, said Melissa Keaney, supervising attorney for the International Refugee Assistance Project. USA TODAY reached out to the State Department for comment on whether it would expand refugee admissions. Keany said she hoped the Afrikaner resettlements would illustrate that it would not be burdensome to restart resettlement. Presidents, however, have wide leeway in setting refugee resettlement targets. "It clearly shows the government can provide a fast and efficient process," she said. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Afrikaners' quick arrival in US renews focus on refugees still waiting

Arrival of Afrikaners renews focus on plight of thousands of other refugees still in limbo

Arrival of Afrikaners renews focus on plight of thousands of other refugees still in limbo Yasmin Aguilar resettled in Boise, Idaho as a ref...

 

VS POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com