Trump sees meager uptick in approval ratings mid-May as economy remains concernNew Foto - Trump sees meager uptick in approval ratings mid-May as economy remains concern

Following atorrent of polls released over the last few weeks,coinciding withPresident Donald Trump's first 100 days in office, the few polls released this week indicate a slight uptick in support for the president. Trump's average approval rating is 45% as of Friday, May 16, with a 51% disapproval number, according to theNew York Times' poll aggregationservice. That's a one-point uptick week over week, with Trump ending thefirst week of Maywith a 44% approval and 51% disapproval rating. Pollster Nate Silver's"Silver Bulletin" newsletterhas the same 45% approval and 51% disapproval aggregate Friday, whileRealClearPolitics' averageis a point higher at a 46% approval and 50% disapproval ranking. Trump began his term with a 47% approval rating, and saw his popularity dip through to his 100th day in office, when his job approval numbers reached historic lows not seen by any other president over the past several decades. Silver, founder of the now-defunct 538 political polling site, said in his Substack Friday that more data is needed to determine if the slight uptick in approval this week is a lasting trend or not. "Now this could just be noise driven by a dearth of new polls, or it could be a reversal of the downward trend we've seen since the start of Trump's term," he said in his "Silver Bulletin" newsletter. "We'll have to wait for more data to find out." Here's how the latest few polls measured how much Americans approve of Trump's job performance. 44% approve 52% disapprove Thesurvey, released May 13, showed 44% of respondents approved of the president's performance, up from 42% in a prior Reuters/Ipsos survey carried out April 25-27. The poll was taken May 12-13 of 1,163 adults, and has a margin of error of ±3 points. The survey concluded that Americans' concerns about a recession have eased over the last few weeks, but still remain high. Approximately 69% of respondents said they were concerned about a recession, Reuters said, down from 76% in a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted April 16-21. The share who said they worried about the stock market fell to 60% from 67% between the April and May surveys. 43% approve 52% disapprove Thepollwas conducted May 9-12 of 1,786 adult citizens, with a ±3.3% margin of error. Since the last survey conducted theweek prior, Trump's approval jumped one point while the percentage of those who disapprove remained the same. When asked how they approved of Trump'sjob performanceon education, health care, civil rights and civil liberties,40% of respondentssaid they approved of how he handled each category. Nearly half approved of Trump's approach to immigration and crime, while his lowest marks concerned the economy: with 42% approving of jobs and the economy, 38% of respondents agreeing with the president's stance on foreign trade, and just 35% approving of his position on inflation and prices. 46% approve 52% disapprove Trump's approval ratings are unchanged from last week's poll byMorning Consult. The Republican leader continues to get solid marks from 89% of Republican voters, Morning Consult says, while 58% of independents disapprove of his job performance. The poll was conducted May 9-11 among 2,221 registered U.S. voters, and has a margin of error of ±2 percentage points. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her atkapalmer@usatoday.comand on X @KathrynPlmr. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump approval ratings mid-May see small jump

Trump sees meager uptick in approval ratings mid-May as economy remains concern

Trump sees meager uptick in approval ratings mid-May as economy remains concern Following atorrent of polls released over the last few weeks...
Case of brain-dead pregnant woman kept on life support in Georgia raises tricky questionsNew Foto - Case of brain-dead pregnant woman kept on life support in Georgia raises tricky questions

ATLANTA (AP) — The case of apregnant woman in Georgiawho was declared brain dead and has been kept on life support for three months has given rise to complicated questions about abortion law and whether a fetus is a person. Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old nurse and mother, was about two months pregnant on Feb. 19 when she was declared brain dead, according to an online fundraising page started by her mother. Doctors said Georgia's strict anti-abortion law requires that she remain on life support until the fetus has developed enough to be delivered, her mother wrote. The law, one of a wave of measures enacted in conservative states after the Supreme Courtoverturned Roe v. Wadein 2022, restricts abortion once cardiac activity is detected and gives personhood rights to a fetus. Smith's mother says it has left her family without a say in a difficult situation, and with her due date still months away, the family is left wondering whether the baby will be born with disabilities or can even survive. Some activists, many of them Black women like Smith, say it raises issues of racial equity. What does the law say? Emory Healthcare, which runs the hospital, has not explained how doctors decided to keep Smith on life support except to say in a statement they considered "Georgia's abortion laws and all other applicable laws." The state adopted a law in 2019 to ban abortion after cardiac activity can be detected, about six weeks into pregnancy, thatcame into effectafter Roe v. Wade was overturned. That law does not explicitly address Smith's situation, but allows abortion to preserve the life or physical health of the pregnant woman. Three other states have similar bans that kick in around the six-week mark and 12 bar abortion at all stages of pregnancy. David S. Cohen, a professor at Drexel University's Thomas R. Kline School of Law in Philadelphia, said the hospital might be most concerned about part of the law that gives fetuses legal rights as "members of the species Homo sapiens." Cohen said Emory may therefore consider Smith and the fetus as two patients and that once Smith was on life support, they had a legal obligation to keep the fetus alive, even after she died. "These are the kind of cases that law professors have been talking about for a long time when they talk about fetal personhood," he said. State Rep. Nabilah Islam Parkes, an Atlanta-area Democrat, said Friday that she sent a letter to state Attorney General Chris Carr asking for a legal opinion on how Georgia's abortion law applies when a pregnant woman is brain dead. Personhood divide within anti-abortion movement Anti-abortion groups are divided over whether they should supportpersonhood provisions, which are on the books in at least 17 states, according to the advocacy group Pregnancy Justice. Some argue that fertilized eggs, embryos and fetuses should be considered people with the same rights as those already born. This personhood concept seeks to give them rights under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which says a state can't "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process or law; nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Some saw personhood as politically impractical, especially after personhood amendments to state constitutions were rejected by voters in Colorado, Mississippi and North Dakota between 2008 and 2014. Those who steered away sought laws and restrictions on abortion that stopped short of personhood, although they were often informed by the concept. Personhood proponents argue this lacks moral clarity. Some personhood proponents have been sidelined in national anti-abortion groups; the National Right to Life Committee cut ties with its Georgia Right to Life affiliate in 2014 after the state wing opposed bills that restricted abortion but allowed exceptions for rape and incest. Unequal access to care for Black women The Associated Press has not been able to reach Smith's mother, April Newkirk. But Newkirk told Atlanta TV station WXIA that her daughter went to a hospital complaining of headaches and was given medication and released. Then, her boyfriend awoke to her gasping for air and called 911. Emory University Hospital determined she had blood clots in her brain and she was declared brain dead. It's not clear what Smith said when she went to the hospital or whether the care she was given was standard for her symptoms. But Black women often complain their pain isn't taken seriously, and anAssociated Press investigationfound that health outcomes for Black women are worse because of circumstances linked to racism and unequal access to care. Monica Simpson, executive director of SisterSong, the lead plaintiff in alawsuit challengingGeorgia's abortion law, said: "Black women must be trusted when it comes to our health care decisions." "Like so many Black women, Adriana spoke up for herself. She expressed what she felt in her body, and as a health care provider, she knew how to navigate the medical system," Simpson said, noting that by the time Smith was diagnosed "it was already too late." It's unclear whether the clots in Smith's brain were related to her pregnancy. But her situation is undoubtedly alarming for those seeking solutions todisparities in the maternal mortality rate among Black women. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Black women had a mortality rate of 50.3 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2023. That's more than three times the rate for white women, and it is higher than the rates for Hispanic and Asian women. What is Smith's current situation? While Smith is on a ventilator and likely other life-support devices, being declared brain dead means she is dead. Some experts refer to "life support" as "maintenance measures," "organ support" or "somatic support," which relates to the body as distinct from the mind. Emory has not made public what is being done to allow Smith's fetus to continue to develop. In another case in Florida, doctors successfully delivered the baby of a 31-year-old woman who was declared brain dead while 22 weeks pregnant, but not without weeks of sustained monitoring, testing and medical care. The woman's family wanted to keep the fetus, physicians with the University of Florida College of Medicine said in a 2023 paper. On her first day of admission, doctors administered hormones to raise her blood pressure and placed a feeding tube. After she was transferred to an intensive care unit, an obstetric nurse stayed by her bedside continuously to monitor the fetus' heart rate and movements. She was on a ventilator, regularly received steroids and hormones, and needed multiple antibiotics to treat pneumonia. Her medical team encompassed multiple specialties: obstetrics, neonatology, radiology and endocrinology. Doctors performed surgery to remove the fetus at 33 weeks when its heart rate fell, and the baby appeared to be in good health at birth. "We don't have great science to guide clinical decision making in these cases," said Dr. Kavita Arora, an obstetrician and gynecologist in North Carolina who raised concerns about the effect of prolonged ventilator use on a fetus. "There simply aren't a lot of cases like this." The 2023 paper warned that "costs should not be underestimated." It is not clear whether Smith, whose mother said she was a nurse at Emory University Hospital, had health insurance. But JoAnn Volk, a professor, founder and co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University, said that that for people with health insurance, it's generally up to the insurer to determine whether care is medically necessary and covered under the plan. While it is unclear how much it will cost to keep Smith on life support until the fetus can be delivered, or who will be responsible for that cost, her mother's GoFundMe page mentions Smith's 7-year-old son and notes that the baby could have significant disabilities as it aims to raise $275,000. ___ Mulvihill reported from Cherry Hill, New Jersey. Associated Press reporter Jeff Amy in Atlanta contributed.

Case of brain-dead pregnant woman kept on life support in Georgia raises tricky questions

Case of brain-dead pregnant woman kept on life support in Georgia raises tricky questions ATLANTA (AP) — The case of apregnant woman in Geor...
DHS says it's in beginning stages of 'vetting process' for immigrant reality TV showNew Foto - DHS says it's in beginning stages of 'vetting process' for immigrant reality TV show

The Department of Homeland Security is reviewing a reality TV pitch where immigrants would compete for American citizenship, according to a spokesperson who said in a statement to CNN that "the show in question is in the very beginning stages of that vetting process and has not received approval or denial by staff." A producer who has pitched the idea to DHS said he envisions the show as being a "positive love letter to America" while dismissing criticism that it would be "punching down" on contestants. Rob Worsoff, himself a Canadian immigrant whose credits include "The Millionaire Matchmaker," "Duck Dynasty" and "The Biggest Loser," said he's pitched the idea for his show as far back as the Obama Administration. He said he's had three conversations with the current DHS about his pitch — "and they've gone far" — but said Secretary Kristi Noem has not been involved in any of the discussions. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told CNN in a statement that DHS "receives hundreds of television show pitches a year, ranging from documentaries surrounding ICE and CBP border operation to white collar investigations by HSI. Each proposal undergoes a thorough vetting process prior to denial or approval." The Daily Mail and theWall Street Journalpreviously reported on the show. McLaughlin denied aspects of theearlier reportin the Daily Mail, however, saying Noem has not "'backed' or even reviewed the pitch of any scripted or reality show." Worsoff said he envisions his show being like "'The Biggest Loser' for immigration" – referencing the former reality show where overweight contestants competed to see who would lose the most weight, and which had also been the subject of criticism about its content. But he insisted: "There's nobody who loses on this show — it's ridiculous to even suggest otherwise." "These are all people who are likely to become future Americans," Worsoff said. "They are all people with a place in line. They are all people that are good candidates. I'm not punching down on anyone — I am offering somebody the opportunity to jump to the front of the line and nobody else loses. In fact, everybody else in line will be humanized and we'll get to know their face and their story and we'll love them and maybe they'll get a job out of it, or maybe they'll get other opportunities out of it." He provided CNN with portions of a pitch deck for the show with a working title "The American." A description of the pitch for a show reads: "Contestants will represent a wide demographic of ages, ethnicities, and talents. We'll join in the laughter, tears, frustration and joy — hearing their backstories — as we are reminded of how amazing it is to be American, through the eyes of 12 wonderful people who want nothing more than to have what we have — and what we often take for granted: the freedom, opportunity and honor of what it means to be American." Each episode would include a heritage challenge, an elimination challenge, a town-hall meeting and a final vote, according to the deck. Worsoff said the heritage challenge will be tailored to specific locations — a "gold rush" challenge in San Francisco, for example, or a "pizza" challenge in New York or a "NASA" challenge in Florida — to showcase "how cool America is." He acknowledged the stakes would be high for the contestants but said that's not a bad thing. "I would hope that any competition reality show has stakes," Worsoff told CNN. "Yeah, I'm not going to apologize for that fact that there are real stakes on the show. I don't think that's a bad thing, I think that's a good thing." For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

DHS says it’s in beginning stages of ‘vetting process’ for immigrant reality TV show

DHS says it's in beginning stages of 'vetting process' for immigrant reality TV show The Department of Homeland Security is revi...
Missouri governor says he'll bring lawmakers back to get a plan for keeping the Chiefs and RoyalsNew Foto - Missouri governor says he'll bring lawmakers back to get a plan for keeping the Chiefs and Royals

Missouri's governor said Friday that he will call the Legislature into a special session to consider incentives aimed at keeping theKansas City Chiefsand Royals from moving to Kansas after lawmakers failed to passa planduring their regular, annual session. Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe wants his state to help with a renovated or new stadium for pro football's Chiefs and with a new home venue for baseball's Royals.A Kansas lawenacted last year authorizes state bonds for 70% of the cost of a new stadium, paying them off over 30 years with revenues from sports betting, Kansas Lottery ticket sales, and new sales and alcohol taxes. Voters in Jackson County, Missouri, where the teams are located, encouraged Kansas officials to make a play for the teams byturning down a sales tax extensionlast year that would have helped finance a new, $2 billion ballpark district for the Royals and an $800 million renovation of the Chiefs' Arrowhead Stadium. The Chiefs and Royals have played for more than 50 years in side-by-side stadiums in eastern Kansas City, drawing fans from both states of the split metropolitan area. Their stadium leases run until 2031. "This is a huge economic development package," Kehoe told reporters during a news conference livestreamed from the Missouri Capitol in Jefferson City. "I'd like to see us make sure we can solidify our offer with legislative approval." The GOP-controlled Missouri House approved a Kehoe-backed bill Tuesday that would have allowed the state to issue bonds for up to half the cost of the stadium projects and allow tax credits of up to $50 million. But the Republican-controlled Senate abruptly ended its regular-session work Wednesday after a contentious fight overan anti-abortion measure,without taking up the stadium financing measure. At least a few Kansas and Missouri lawmakers from both parties are skeptical of state incentives. Many economists contend that public funding for stadiumsisn't worth it,because sports tend to divert discretionary spending away from other forms of entertainment rather than generate new income.

Missouri governor says he'll bring lawmakers back to get a plan for keeping the Chiefs and Royals

Missouri governor says he'll bring lawmakers back to get a plan for keeping the Chiefs and Royals Missouri's governor said Friday th...
Woman connected to the Zizians fired the bullet that killed a Vermont border agent, report saysNew Foto - Woman connected to the Zizians fired the bullet that killed a Vermont border agent, report says

A woman charged in the Januarykilling of a U.S. Border Patrol agentduring a Vermont traffic stopfired the bulletthat struck him in the neck, authorities say in a new report. Another agent fired back during the Jan. 20 stop, wounding Teresa Youngblut and killing her companion, Felix Bauckholt, the U.S. Customs and Border Protectionsaid in a statementWednesday. Youngblut and Bauckholt were affiliated with the Zizians,a cultlike groupthat has also been linked to killings inPennsylvania and California, authorities allege. The shootout happened after an agent pulled them over on Interstate 91 a few miles (kilometers) from the Canadian border. About 30 minutes into the stop, the agents asked Youngblut and Bauckholt to get out of their car to be questioned, the border agency said in its report, which doesn't name anyone involved. They reported that Youngblut "suddenly drew a firearm and opened fire," killing the agent David Maland, it said. One of four agents on the scene returned fire, striking Youngblut once in the arm and once in the leg. The same agent reported that Bauckholt began drawing a firearm from his side and that he ordered him to stop. The agent said the man "failed to comply" and that he fired twice on the man, striking Bauckholt twice in the chest. Two minutes after that exchange, an agent radioed in that another had suffered a critical gunshot wound to the neck, the report said. Agents and a Vermont state trooper rendered aid to him and he was driven to a hospital, where he died. Youngblut was arrested and police attempted to place a tourniquet on her leg while awaiting emergency responders, according to the report. In total, that agent fired about eight rounds and Youngblut fired four, according to the border agency. Two guns were later recovered from the scene that had been in Youngblut and Bauckholt's possession, authorities said. On Jan. 19, a border patrol agent assigned to a Homeland Security Investigations Task Force notified the border patrol Newport Station management of a report that the couple had checked into a hotel wearing black tactical gear on Jan. 13, according to the report. At least one of them was carrying a gun and both arrived in the Prius they were later in during the shootout. The agent advised the Newport station that state and federal law enforcement officials "had previously identified the male as a German citizen, in possession of a H1B visa with unknown immigration status." Youngblut is charged with intentionally using a deadly weapon towards federal law enforcement, and using and discharging a firearm during an assault with a deadly weapon. She pleaded not guilty. When asked to comment on the report, Fabienne Boisvert-DeFazio, a spokesperson for the U. S. Attorney's Office for the District of Vermont, said the office "does not comment on ongoing cases beyond the public record."

Woman connected to the Zizians fired the bullet that killed a Vermont border agent, report says

Woman connected to the Zizians fired the bullet that killed a Vermont border agent, report says A woman charged in the Januarykilling of a U...

 

VS POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com