Missouri governor says he'll bring lawmakers back to get a plan for keeping the Chiefs and RoyalsNew Foto - Missouri governor says he'll bring lawmakers back to get a plan for keeping the Chiefs and Royals

Missouri's governor said Friday that he will call the Legislature into a special session to consider incentives aimed at keeping theKansas City Chiefsand Royals from moving to Kansas after lawmakers failed to passa planduring their regular, annual session. Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe wants his state to help with a renovated or new stadium for pro football's Chiefs and with a new home venue for baseball's Royals.A Kansas lawenacted last year authorizes state bonds for 70% of the cost of a new stadium, paying them off over 30 years with revenues from sports betting, Kansas Lottery ticket sales, and new sales and alcohol taxes. Voters in Jackson County, Missouri, where the teams are located, encouraged Kansas officials to make a play for the teams byturning down a sales tax extensionlast year that would have helped finance a new, $2 billion ballpark district for the Royals and an $800 million renovation of the Chiefs' Arrowhead Stadium. The Chiefs and Royals have played for more than 50 years in side-by-side stadiums in eastern Kansas City, drawing fans from both states of the split metropolitan area. Their stadium leases run until 2031. "This is a huge economic development package," Kehoe told reporters during a news conference livestreamed from the Missouri Capitol in Jefferson City. "I'd like to see us make sure we can solidify our offer with legislative approval." The GOP-controlled Missouri House approved a Kehoe-backed bill Tuesday that would have allowed the state to issue bonds for up to half the cost of the stadium projects and allow tax credits of up to $50 million. But the Republican-controlled Senate abruptly ended its regular-session work Wednesday after a contentious fight overan anti-abortion measure,without taking up the stadium financing measure. At least a few Kansas and Missouri lawmakers from both parties are skeptical of state incentives. Many economists contend that public funding for stadiumsisn't worth it,because sports tend to divert discretionary spending away from other forms of entertainment rather than generate new income.

Missouri governor says he'll bring lawmakers back to get a plan for keeping the Chiefs and Royals

Missouri governor says he'll bring lawmakers back to get a plan for keeping the Chiefs and Royals Missouri's governor said Friday th...
Woman connected to the Zizians fired the bullet that killed a Vermont border agent, report saysNew Foto - Woman connected to the Zizians fired the bullet that killed a Vermont border agent, report says

A woman charged in the Januarykilling of a U.S. Border Patrol agentduring a Vermont traffic stopfired the bulletthat struck him in the neck, authorities say in a new report. Another agent fired back during the Jan. 20 stop, wounding Teresa Youngblut and killing her companion, Felix Bauckholt, the U.S. Customs and Border Protectionsaid in a statementWednesday. Youngblut and Bauckholt were affiliated with the Zizians,a cultlike groupthat has also been linked to killings inPennsylvania and California, authorities allege. The shootout happened after an agent pulled them over on Interstate 91 a few miles (kilometers) from the Canadian border. About 30 minutes into the stop, the agents asked Youngblut and Bauckholt to get out of their car to be questioned, the border agency said in its report, which doesn't name anyone involved. They reported that Youngblut "suddenly drew a firearm and opened fire," killing the agent David Maland, it said. One of four agents on the scene returned fire, striking Youngblut once in the arm and once in the leg. The same agent reported that Bauckholt began drawing a firearm from his side and that he ordered him to stop. The agent said the man "failed to comply" and that he fired twice on the man, striking Bauckholt twice in the chest. Two minutes after that exchange, an agent radioed in that another had suffered a critical gunshot wound to the neck, the report said. Agents and a Vermont state trooper rendered aid to him and he was driven to a hospital, where he died. Youngblut was arrested and police attempted to place a tourniquet on her leg while awaiting emergency responders, according to the report. In total, that agent fired about eight rounds and Youngblut fired four, according to the border agency. Two guns were later recovered from the scene that had been in Youngblut and Bauckholt's possession, authorities said. On Jan. 19, a border patrol agent assigned to a Homeland Security Investigations Task Force notified the border patrol Newport Station management of a report that the couple had checked into a hotel wearing black tactical gear on Jan. 13, according to the report. At least one of them was carrying a gun and both arrived in the Prius they were later in during the shootout. The agent advised the Newport station that state and federal law enforcement officials "had previously identified the male as a German citizen, in possession of a H1B visa with unknown immigration status." Youngblut is charged with intentionally using a deadly weapon towards federal law enforcement, and using and discharging a firearm during an assault with a deadly weapon. She pleaded not guilty. When asked to comment on the report, Fabienne Boisvert-DeFazio, a spokesperson for the U. S. Attorney's Office for the District of Vermont, said the office "does not comment on ongoing cases beyond the public record."

Woman connected to the Zizians fired the bullet that killed a Vermont border agent, report says

Woman connected to the Zizians fired the bullet that killed a Vermont border agent, report says A woman charged in the Januarykilling of a U...
'Root out DEI': Why red states are enlisting in Trump's war on 'woke'New Foto - 'Root out DEI': Why red states are enlisting in Trump's war on 'woke'

When he took office in January, West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey issued an executive order eliminatingdiversity, equity and inclusionin state government. Last week, he signed a bill making that order the law in his state. "I pledged to root out DEI," Morrisey said at a ceremonial bill signing. "Now I can report to you that we are following through with that promise and that's a wonderful reason to be here today. DEI is dead in the Mountain State." With PresidentDonald Trumpleading the charge, diversity initiatives have emerged as a new front in the nation's culture wars. Now Republican-led states are joining the fight. While most anti-DEI bills target higher education, 25 states from Louisiana to South Carolina are considering 101 measures that would limit DEI in state and local governments and other publicly funded institutions, according to Bill Kramer, vice president and counsel of state and local government relations firm MultiState. In response, blue states are rolling out bills defending DEI. "I definitely think state lawmakers have been emboldened by the actions on the federal level," said Kramer, whose firm tracks legislation for hundreds of clients. So far this year, nine states have enacted anti-DEI laws and nine more have passed a bill through at least one chamber. Just this week Iowa sentlegislation barring DEIactivities and offices to Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds for her signature. The aim of state legislation mirrors the president's agenda, tothrottle DEIacross the public sector and increase pressure on the private sector. In April, Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, a Republican, signed a bill banning DEI offices, officers, policies or practices in local government. "Governor Sanders was proud to sign this legislation because government should be focused on serving the people and saving taxpayer dollars, not wasting time and money on woke nonsense," her spokesman Sam Dubke told USA TODAY in a statement. Last week Indiana Gov. Mike Braun, a Republican, signed an "unlawful discrimination" bill prohibiting public institutions from taking actions based on an individual's identity such as race or religion. Braun signed an executive order in January banning DEI initiatives in state government. For years diversity initiatives have comeunder firein red states, either as "DEI" or "critical race theory." In 2022, those terms appeared for the first time in bills introduced in 12 states, according to a USA TODAY analysis of data compiled by bill-tracking firm Plural. Dozens of bills targeting universities and state governments drafted by anti-DEI think tanks and foundations are part of a broaderbacklashagainst theDEI initiativesembraced after George Floyd's 2020 murder to redress historic patterns of discrimination and exclusion in the workplace. Critics likeRussell Vought, andStephen Miller– both now Trump officials – assailed diversity targets and other DEI strategies as anillegal form of discriminationthat prioritizes race and gender over individual merit. Trump seized on the wedge issue during his 2024 presidential campaign, vowing to defeat"anti-White" racism. Just hours after taking the oath of office on Jan. 20, Trump issued executive orders todismantle DEI programs. Wade Miller, senior adviser for the Center for Renewing America, applauded states for lining up to help Trump. "We welcome all bills aimed at dismantling DEI," said Miller, speaking for the conservative think tank Vought founded in January 2021. The momentum of these bills in red states is unlikely to slow, according to Republican pollster Whit Ayres. "The top four reasons people voted for Trump were to bring down inflation, juice the economy, stop illegal immigration and to get away from woke culture," said Ayres, president of North Star Opinion Research. Democrats warn the new wave of anti-DEI legislation could have sweeping implications for local and state government workers and the communities they serve. "The best way to make sure that the government is working for all versus just the few is to have people working in government who understand the experiences of the people they are serving and who have the skills to be excellent in their jobs," said Eliza Leighton, who advocates for DEI as executive director of Deliver the American Dream, part of the American Pride Rises network. "DEI work at the state level is ensuring those things." In Indiana, Senate Democratscondemned a new anti-DEI lawas "a step backward" for diverse communities within the state who face discrimination. "When we introduce legislation that claims that we want everyone to be treated equally, I love that. I have yet to meet a person on this Earth who said we should not treat people equally," said state Sen. Fady Qaddoura, a Democrat. "But what this legislation ignores is that people have different starting points in their lives." Last week, Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signed into law the "Dismantling DEI Departments Act" banning DEI offices and departments in the Tennessee government. Also on the governor's desk is the "Dismantle DEI Act." If signed, it would bar state and local governments, public colleges, and school systems from considering race, sex or other demographic characteristics in employment decisions. On the House floor last month, Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson, a Republican and the senate sponsor of both bills, said Tennessee is aligning itself with the priorities of the Trump administration. House sponsor Rep. Aron Maberry said diversity will "happen naturally through fair hiring practices." DEI isn't about giving unfair advantages because of gender or skin color, but making sure qualified candidates are not denied equal access to opportunities because of their identity, Tennessee Senate Minority Leader Raumesh Akbari responded. "It is unfortunate that diversity, equity and inclusion has become this ugly political tool to divide people," Akbari said on the House floor in April. "What diversity, equity and inclusion principles do is that they make sure that folks who are different but who are equally qualified get a fair shake." Tennessee "deserves a government that reflects the people it serves, not one that turns back the clock on progress," she told USA TODAY. Akbari and Sen. London Lamar, another Democrat who spoke out against the "Dismantle DEI Act" on the House floor, are two of three Black state senators in Tennessee, a state where 17% of the population is Black. "As a Black woman, a state senator, and lifelong advocate for equity, I'm deeply disturbed by the Tennessee Legislature's continued attacks on diversity, equity, and inclusion," Lamar told USA TODAY in a statement. "These efforts aren't about fairness or accountability, they're about silencing progress and pushing marginalized voices out of spaces we've fought hard to enter." Voicing his opposition to the "Dismantling DEI Departments Act" in March, Rep.Larry Miller, a Democrat, retired firefighter and the longest-serving member of the Tennessee House of Representatives, spoke in personal terms. "I am the product of DEI. Chances are I would not be sitting here today if I were not. And what your bill is saying (is): 'We want to dismantle and do away with that history. My history, my personal history," Miller said. "DEI helped build this country." In blue states, pro-DEI legislation is also on the rise. Of the 426 DEI bills tracked by American Pride Rises so far in 2025, 221 favor DEI and 205 oppose it. In April, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, vetoed a bill from the Republican-controlled Legislature that would have banned DEI hiring practices in state and local governments. "The state does not mandate any composition of its workforce and already has a merit-focused hiring system in an effort to recruit the best possible talent into the ranks of public service," she wrote in a letter to the state Senate vetoing the bill. This week Hobbsvetoeda second bill that would have wiped out DEI offices and activities in state agencies, colleges and universities and local governments. Is a piece of legislation pro-DEI or anti-DEI? Sometimes it depends on who you ask. A bill in Michigan House of Representatives that would require state agencies to hire employees based on objective factors such as relevant work experience and education was sponsored by pro-DEI Democrats but appeared to have been originally crafted and introduced by Republicans in the previous term. While the term "DEI" does not appear in the bill that promotes merit-based hiring, House Republicans said the legislation would eliminate it. "Merit-based hiring and promotion is simple: You do a good job, and you'll be rewarded. Why any other metric matters is a mystery," GOP Rep. Joseph Pavlovsaid. "There is no place for DEI in our government." According to Benjamin Ries, Pavlov's director of legislation, the Legislative Services Bureau made a clerical error and gave this bill to Rep. Erin Byrnes, a Democrat, who then sponsored it, receiving "overwhelming Democrat cosponsorship." "The representative is hopeful that his Democrat colleagues have seen that DEI doesn't help the people it aims at helping," Ries said. Byrnes told USA TODAY the bill gave her the opportunity to flip the script. Decreasing the influence of personal connections in the hiring process creates a more equal playing field for all workers, she said. Her bill sailed through the Michigan House of Representatives with near unanimous support. "House Republicans in Michigan voted yes on a DEI bill. I love that for them," Byrnes told USA TODAY. "House Democrats know that merit-based hiring and diversity, equity and inclusion practices are not mutually exclusive. That is a false narrative that Republicans have been pushing for years now. Just because Republicans say something doesn't make it fact." Only one representative opposed the bill and he is a Democrat. State Rep. Dylan Wegela also removed his name as a cosponsor of the bill. "I voted against the bill because it's an anti-DEI bill," Wegela told USA TODAY. (This story was updated to add new information.) Contributing: Jayme Fraser This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:'Root out DEI': How Trump's war on 'woke' spread to states

'Root out DEI': Why red states are enlisting in Trump's war on 'woke'

'Root out DEI': Why red states are enlisting in Trump's war on 'woke' When he took office in January, West Virginia Gov....
Ex-U.S. attorney who refused to drop charges against NYC mayor quietly returns to spotlightNew Foto - Ex-U.S. attorney who refused to drop charges against NYC mayor quietly returns to spotlight

It had the makings of a significant news event — the first public appearance of a former U.S. attorney whoresigned in protestafter defying the Trump administration. But the panel featuring Danielle Sassoon proved most notable for how careful she and a famed former New York prosecutor were in avoiding any direct remarks about the president or his Justice Department. The New York City Bar Association event underscored the unease, public silence and caution hovering over much of the legal community four months into Donald Trump's second term as president. A former federal prosecutor who now works at a large law firm summed up the dynamic in one word: "Fear." "People are keeping their heads down," said the lawyer, who asked not to be named due to fear of retaliation from Trump. "Scared of being audited. Scared of being investigated. The federal government is very powerful." Sassoon was the top federal prosecutor in Manhattan until February, when she resigned rather than carry out orders from Trump appointees in the Justice Department todrop federal corruption chargesagainst New York City Mayor Eric Adams. A half dozen other federal prosecutors in New York and Washington subsequently refused to drop the charges and resigned in one of the highest-profile public rebukes of a president since Watergate. On Tuesday, a dozen reporters and a smattering of camera crews descended on the New York City Bar Association's majestic, six-story neoclassical headquarters. A routine continuing legal education event focused on female lawyers specializing in white-collar crime drew attention for one reason: Sassoon. In a blue carpeted meeting room lined with mahogany walls and portraits of Supreme Court justices, Sassoon was scheduled to conduct a 45-minute "fireside chat" with Mary Jo White, the first woman to serve as the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. Known as anaggressive prosecutor with an independent streak, White oversaw the prosecutions of organized crime leader John Gotti and the leaders of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Jenna Dabbs, herself a former federal prosecutor in Manhattan, introduced Sassoon and White and thanked Sassoon for attending the session weeks after giving birth to her third child. Sassoon, dressed in black pants and a black vest, thanked her. Dabbs then came the closest of any speaker to directly addressing the unprecedented events occurring in the Justice Department under the second Trump administration. She praised Sassoon's brief tenure as the acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, which handles cases in Manhattan, the Bronx and part of Westchester County, as "principled, courageous and brave." In a protest letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, Sassoon had said that Adams' lawyer had proposed what amounted to a "quid pro quo." Federal prosecutors would drop graft charges against Adams in exchange for Adams' cooperation in the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. After Bondi declined to meet with her, Sassoon resigned. Dabbs said Sassoon had "upheld the oath" she had taken to defend the Constitution. "She acquitted herself in a manner reflective of the finest traditions of that office, regrettably at some personal cost," Dabbs said. After a warm round of applause, Sassoon asked White about the role mentors had played in her career. White responded that Sassoon herself was now a role model. "You're that right now," White said. "You're an extraordinary lawyer and you're the epitome of integrity and strength." White then thanked Sassoon for her conduct in the Adams case without naming Adams, Bondi or Trump. "You didn't choose to deal with what you had to deal with," White said. "But how you handled that was exceptional, and I thank you." Sassoon asked White if she came under political pressure during her tenure in 1990s. "There's obviously a spotlight right now on the relationship between the White House, the DOJ, SDNY, after what happened in the SDNY when I was there — the relationship between politics and prosecution," Sassoon said. "How is it different from when you were U.S. attorney?" White responded carefully and again did not name Trump, Bondi or Adams. "It's always been an issue," she said. Speaking in broad strokes, she said the independence of the Southern District, which earned the moniker the "Sovereign District," had "served the public interest very well." Asked by Sassoon whether she had any advice for people who serve as U.S. attorneys, White was blunt but vague. "You should be prepared to resign two or three times," she said, prompting laughter from the crowd. But White declined to say exactly why she had threatened to resign. In response to a question from Sassoon about what kind of investigations white-collar defense lawyers could expect, White expressed concern about the DOJ "Weaponization Working Group" established by Bondi, which critics say is an effort by Trump to take revenge on his perceived enemies. Again speaking in general terms, White invoked a famed 1940 speech by Attorney General Robert Jackson where he warned federal prosecutors never to abuse their "immense power" by targeting individuals for political or personal reasons. "If you ever turn to focusing on a person and trying to find a crime, you've lost your way," said White. When Sassoon asked the audience for questions, it quickly became clear that White, not Sassoon, would respond. White answered several questions in general terms and again shied away from mentioning Trump by name. Asked by a reporter if she had any comment on Bondi's tenure as attorney general, White replied, "I do not." With that, the event ended.

Ex-U.S. attorney who refused to drop charges against NYC mayor quietly returns to spotlight

Ex-U.S. attorney who refused to drop charges against NYC mayor quietly returns to spotlight It had the makings of a significant news event —...
Rubio says NATO members will agree to 5% defense spending over next decade by June summitNew Foto - Rubio says NATO members will agree to 5% defense spending over next decade by June summit

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday that all NATO members will have agreed on a goal of spending the equivalent to 5% of GDP on defense over the next decade by the 2025 NATO Summit in June. He made the comments while appearing on Fox News' "Hannity." U.S. President Donald Trump cut defence funding to NATO during the latter part of his first term in 2017-21, and has frequently complained that the U.S. is paying more than its fair share. "I can tell you that we are headed for a summit in six weeks, in which virtually every member of NATO will be at or above 2% but more importantly, many of them will be over 4% and all will have agreed on the goal of reaching 5% over the next decade," said Rubio. German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said this week that Berlin backed a demand by Trump for members of the defence alliance to increase defence spending to 5% of gross domestic product (GDP). Germany in January said it met NATO's target of spending 2% of its GDP on defence in 2024. The 2025 NATO Summit will be held in the Netherlands from June 24-25. (Reporting by Costas Pitas; Writing by Jasper Ward; Editing by Michael Perry)

Rubio says NATO members will agree to 5% defense spending over next decade by June summit

Rubio says NATO members will agree to 5% defense spending over next decade by June summit WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Mar...

 

VS POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com